leading from behind. Carter pleased,
http://talk.baltimoresun.com/topic/266299-report-terrorism-deaths-quadruple-under-obama/
http://talk.baltimoresun.com/topic/266299-report-terrorism-deaths-quadruple-under-obama/
Deaths from terrorism increase 4 fold under Obama
- Thread starter WVPATX
- Start date
You've completely jumped the shark yet again wow. Now you're linking reader comments? really? That guy picks out terrorist caused deaths from the entire planet from one year of the last prez and compares it to last year. Is BO the president of the entire planet? Laying the blame for world woes on BO is beyond desperate. Keep the crazy stats from totally obscure sources coming though.
Leading from behind isn't a strategy. JV team isn't a strategy. Abandoning Iraq isn't a strategy. A feckless red line in Syria isn't a strategy. Bombing Libya into submission isn't a strategy. Spending $500M to train 5 fighters isn't a strategy. Supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Eqypt isn't a strategy. Abandoning the Green Movement in Iran isn't a strategy. I could go on and on.
I won't dispute the "facts" but any attempt to imply causality is nothing more than conjecture. Ok, I'll do it for you. Radical muslims had a big year of murdering last year and it's BO's fault. Got it.
LMAO. This has to be the greatest thing ever posted on this board. A++ stuff. [roll]
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/24/opinions/ghitis-russia-jet-shot-down/index.html
Scroll down to the "Who's bombing in Syria" graphic....so passive. WWIII? let's get this thing started!! We need a leader who will escalate this thing right now! Truth is, ISIS needs defeated with the least amount of military conflict possible (ISIS wants the opposite). I have no problem with a cautious approach to the situation. Idiots like you can't wait for a huge, multi-nation war in the area with all of the unintended and unforeseen bad outcomes that always accompany these things. Keep praying for a greater war though.
lol you're so clueless to equate that time with this. BTW, what has the French prez done for you to admire his testicles?
Ok, Mr. "I Know it All", what strategy should he use? Ground troops? Then you'll ***** that the job isn't getting done fast enough or that we are spending too much money OR that too many soldiers have died.
Wait....it just dawned on me....."Mission Accomplished".......we shouldn't have had any problems over there because your idol claimed those words on board a ship staged to make it seem like he was out there with the troops when in fact he was only a few miles off the American coast.
It has to be hard defending the indefensible. I really do commiserate with your position.
As usual, you've abandoned the lame point of your thread, can't defend your statements and retreated to your usual clichés. Fail.
The French president is bombing ISIS targets. We have been bombing ISIS targets for quite some time now. How is what the French president is doing any different than what Obama is doing? Unless you mean that France is still planning to take 30k refugees from the ME, and folks here are fighting with Obama about bringing in 10k over the next 2 years.
We need to arrange a real International coalition. We need to put boots on the ground. We need to take out ISIS. The key is to make sure that the Arab community is involved in that coalition and remains behind to provide the stability needed. this will never happen without US leadership.
Hollande is calling it a war and trying to get allies together to destroy ISIS. But I realize some Libs are so far up Obama's butt, they can't see the difference. But a few Libs are waking up to Obama's fecklessness (Panetta, Feinstein, etc.)