While glancing at statistics from the Auburn vs Arky St game, a few things jumped out at me.
1) Arky state ran about 20 more plays than auburn
2) Arky state had about 10 more mins of time of possession
3) Both teams had about the same number of first downs
This got me thinking... in the current era of offense, are things like time of possession and first downs no longer relevant? In the times of "3 yards and a could of dust" those stats clearly showed who was controlling the game, but now, with quick strike offenses and a lack of traditional "drives", do they still have meaning?
The number of plays differential still seems important, since even if you are a quick strike offense, your defense still should be able to stop overmatched teams.
What do folks think?
For reference, I think we had about 19 more first downs than memphis, 12 more plays and a couple mins more in time of possession.
1) Arky state ran about 20 more plays than auburn
2) Arky state had about 10 more mins of time of possession
3) Both teams had about the same number of first downs
This got me thinking... in the current era of offense, are things like time of possession and first downs no longer relevant? In the times of "3 yards and a could of dust" those stats clearly showed who was controlling the game, but now, with quick strike offenses and a lack of traditional "drives", do they still have meaning?
The number of plays differential still seems important, since even if you are a quick strike offense, your defense still should be able to stop overmatched teams.
What do folks think?
For reference, I think we had about 19 more first downs than memphis, 12 more plays and a couple mins more in time of possession.