De'Vinner vs Schad

msuJD164

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2008
1,043
0
0
Joe SchadVerified<s>@</s>schadjoe<small class="time">3m</small> To be absolutely clear, Byron De'Vinner agreed to on-record talk today after more than 30 days of off-record talks and texts and a meeting

And De'Vinner says Schad is lying.



Would be hard for DeVinner to go back now and say those things did happen
 
Last edited:

SyonaraStanz

Senior
Mar 5, 2010
3,224
583
113
Is dumb17 Schad saying that an on-record talk took place or an on-record talk was simply agreed to?
 

Original48

Redshirt
Aug 9, 2007
3,322
0
0
I'm confused..explain it to me like I'm 6

I'll take a shot. Shad believes Devinner is telling the truth about us. But Shad is calling him a liar about Devinner's claims that he was off the record with Shad. So Shad says Devinner is lying about him...but credible on Miss St.
 

msuJD164

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2008
1,043
0
0
Schad tweeted this AFTER Carl Winslow said that Schad "was lying"......I took Schads words, as a round about way of saying Carl Winslow is lying. It is now a battle between Schad and Carl over who gave Urkel a hundred dollar andshake and .....ahhhhhwtf who knows anymore.
 

msuJD164

Redshirt
Dec 1, 2008
1,043
0
0
saying it was on the record.......devinner says schad is lying, he never went on the record....

I say we just watch them tear down each others credibility
 

EAVdog

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2010
2,336
0
36
So DeVinner is Shad's super secret source?

So a party to the crime is the sole objective source? Weak *** journalism, just weak.
 

tenureplan

Senior
Dec 3, 2008
8,374
983
113
Of course he is

The day before Schad made the initial tweet was when that rebel was on the board with the Nigerian letter about Devinner.
 

EAVdog

Redshirt
Aug 10, 2010
2,336
0
36
Schad is known to get his material from message boards. I remember that post, was everywhere 247, tiger droppings, here, etc.... Obvious plant.
 

Toby Nash

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
216
0
0
What credibility? Shad has smidge more than De'Vinner at this point. He posts whatever De'Vinner said(maybe) to Twitter. Is that journalism?