DevlDog, what's your thoughts on N Korea testing the nuke?

Airport

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2001
80,896
994
113
Is this a direct result of the US giving them nuclear technology? Wasn't it Albright or as I like to call her, allstupid, who said these are people we can work with?
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,612
1,493
113
Is this a direct result of the US giving them nuclear technology? Wasn't it Albright or as I like to call her, allstupid, who said these are people we can work with?
Honestly? I think this is "Hey, remember us? Give us money to stop"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Airport

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,612
1,493
113
Didn't Sec Albright and Clinton push to give them a nuclear reactor? I'm just trying to remember.
I don't recall to be honest. I do remember a lot of saber rattling and then magically a lot of discussions began occurring regarding nuke tech.
 

Airport

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2001
80,896
994
113
I don't recall to be honest. I do remember a lot of saber rattling and then magically a lot of discussions began occurring regarding nuke tech.

She drank champagne with the dictator in 93. I'm pretty sure she said these are people we can work with. Pretty sure this shows how easy it is to fool liberal people who think that there's nothing that you can't reason with any person, good or bad. Twenty 2 years later, a pig boy is now dictator
 

Popeer

New member
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
I don't recall to be honest. I do remember a lot of saber rattling and then magically a lot of discussions began occurring regarding nuke tech.
It started in 1994, when the old man was rattling his saber and Bill Clinton started moving troops into the peninsula (I was one of them). Then he was like "Holy sh*t maybe a war with the US and the ROK wouldn't be such a good idea." And then he died, and his pig son took over and it all started again ... and then the son died, and now grandson Kim Jong-un feels like he has to prove how big his balls are. But even in 1994 we really didn't want a war with the North because unlike what's happened in the deserts over the last 20 years, another war in Korea would be like the first one, in which we lost almost as many Americans in three years as we did over 10 years in Vietnam. We could never be sure that the Chinese or the Russians wouldn't jump in on North Korea's side, and we still can't. But unfortunately, violent regime change is the only thing that's going to fix what's wrong there -- they aren't going to reunite peacefully the way Germany did.
 

Airport

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2001
80,896
994
113
It started in 1994, when the old man was rattling his saber and Bill Clinton started moving troops into the peninsula (I was one of them). Then he was like "Holy sh*t maybe a war with the US and the ROK wouldn't be such a good idea." And then he died, and his pig son took over and it all started again ... and then the son died, and now grandson Kim Jong-un feels like he has to prove how big his balls are. But even in 1994 we really didn't want a war with the North because unlike what's happened in the deserts over the last 20 years, another war in Korea would be like the first one, in which we lost almost as many Americans in three years as we did over 10 years in Vietnam. We could never be sure that the Chinese or the Russians wouldn't jump in on North Korea's side, and we still can't. But unfortunately, violent regime change is the only thing that's going to fix what's wrong there -- they aren't going to reunite peacefully the way Germany did.

I'm pretty sure that Albright made a point of having champagne with the first pig humper! I heard it mentioned that it was 93.