If so when and where did he say such a stupid thing.
I really wouldn't play my starters. There is no upside and I don't care what people think about it. We can't afford to lose a single starter.Play some of the 2's and all of the 3's.
Build some experience for next year.
Rest up the starters and get them healthy.
This not the same team that beat #1 LSU. Not skill-wise, not talent-wise, not coaching-wise.
We must beat Vandy.
I hope you guys are kidding when you say don't play the starters, if the starters are gonna get whooped how much more the 2's and 3's!!!
Lol yeah rightLets prove him wrong.
That was Missouri and Deleware state.I think Kent State and Bamma agreed last night for 10min qtr's in the second half just to get it over, and I assume Kent was trying not to get their players hurt
I'm with you on the numbers end but not on the human end, starting the backups would be the equivalent of sacrificing the weak to protect the strong(er)...it would be a slaughter.Who cares?
An L is an L this year, despite the final score.
No moral victories. We have a very thin route to 6 wins and that should be priority number one.
Lose Johnson, Boom, Snell, or a starting oline just for one week and Vandy becomes a much tougher win.
Same with a couple of defenders - Jones, Ware, Pringle...
Losing to Bama by 3 TD's or 5 means squat this year.
I'm with you on the numbers end but not on the human end, starting the backups would be the equivalent of sacrificing the weak to protect the strong(er)...it would be a slaughter.