It better be for a conference championship or national. If not, no wayuseless In dire need I don't think any coach would burn a redshirt for one game especially a bowl game.
You could be right but if the kid hasn't played all year if wouldn't chance a reinjury unless in the playoffred, I think given the date of the Bowl games, sometimes a kid is eligible to play, without the loss of a year of eligibility.
Maybe I'm confusing it, but Mister Cobble played lots in the January 2011 Birmingham Bowl, becoming eligible without the loss of a season late in the year of 2010, after the end of the regular season.
Redshirts do not come off before bowls. Stoops recently said West is not practicing yet. West used his redshirt in 2014.I want West to get a shot if healthy and it's legal. Gosh, this kid deserves a break . . . . and not the kind of breaks he's had.
Hasn't West already redshirted prior to this season? If so, are we hoping to get a 6th year of eligibility for him down the road? If not, then I don't see the hesitation in playing him.
See the RV2 post two minutes before yours.Does the "red shirt status" continue through the Bowl Game?????
I thought West was a Freshman last year? If I am not mistaken he played quite a bit. I think he was a true sophmore before injuring himself. He will be a Sophmore in 2016/17
Strictly rules speaking;
A player can redshirt for a season and still be eligible to play in the Bowl game without losing that redshirt. Reason being the NCAA counts the Bowl game as a Spring semester game. Redshirts have played in bowl games and not lost that redshirt for the season before at UK and again when I played at Tulsa. Transfers who have to sit out the season are also eligible to play in the bowl game, they just have to sit out 2 semesters, so if they transfered to your school in the spring then that will count as 1 semester and then the following fall semester (during the football regular season) would be the 2nd semester. The bowl games are the spring semester which would make the 3rd semester so the transfer would be eligible, I've also seen this happen.
With all of that said, a medical redshirt is different. You have to meet certian qualifications to gain a medical redshirt and its also retro active, meaning they grant it after your regular eligibility is up. Not sure the NCAA would allow them to play in the bowl game if they are trying to get that medical redshirt.
Pretty sure if you play in a bowl game you just burned your redshirt. Care to share that rule you mention.
I thought West was a Freshman last year? If I am not mistaken he played quite a bit. I think he was a true sophmore before injuring himself. He will be a Sophmore in 2016/17
I thought West was a Freshman last year? If I am not mistaken he played quite a bit. I think he was a true sophmore before injuring himself. He will be a Sophmore in 2016/17
Was speaking from experience. At Tulsa when we played in the Liberty Bowl we played a sophomore who was redshirting. It didn't burn his redshirt, he still played 3 more seasons after that. I have no clue what the rules say, just know what I experienced. What I stated about the rules is what we were told on why the player was able to play and not lose eligibility.
I want West to get a shot if healthy and it's legal. Gosh, this kid deserves a break . . . . and not the kind of breaks he's had.
I'm guessing your memory of the facts and details is incorrect. If you play you lose the redshirt.