Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 132250318" data-attributes="member: 1812660"><p>It is not like this is a bold statement.&nbsp; There have been 4 teams since Carter.&nbsp; The dumpster fire of the first year after JC.&nbsp; The potential of Oscar and Derek with so-so guard play in 2nd year post JC.&nbsp; Then the disappointment of Oscar quitting despite Miles really coming on as great contributor in the 3rd year post JC.&nbsp; Lastly the dumpster fire from last year after Derek and Miles left.&nbsp; Pretty easy to say it is better than the dumpster fire teams at this point.&nbsp; Outside of Purdue, which has manhandled some pretty good teams and was only really contested by Marquette this year, WVU hasn't really struggled or dropped one against the early schedule as all the last four teams have.&nbsp; So it is too early to definitively make that statement, but it certainly is not an outlandish or bold prediction considering how the first 7 games have gone this year.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 132250318, member: 1812660"] It is not like this is a bold statement. There have been 4 teams since Carter. The dumpster fire of the first year after JC. The potential of Oscar and Derek with so-so guard play in 2nd year post JC. Then the disappointment of Oscar quitting despite Miles really coming on as great contributor in the 3rd year post JC. Lastly the dumpster fire from last year after Derek and Miles left. Pretty easy to say it is better than the dumpster fire teams at this point. Outside of Purdue, which has manhandled some pretty good teams and was only really contested by Marquette this year, WVU hasn't really struggled or dropped one against the early schedule as all the last four teams have. So it is too early to definitively make that statement, but it certainly is not an outlandish or bold prediction considering how the first 7 games have gone this year. [/QUOTE]

Name