I suspect you’re extremely lacking in most aspects of life. Just another loonie lefty.
Do you think int should be legal to protest something at the private residence of a public official ?
- Thread starter ManitouDan
- Start date
Another swing and a miss. Nice try though pumpkin.
when did this turn into Jeopardy ? LOL JK you man .
I certainly didn't agree with any shot or mask mandates, but the thought of going to Andy Beshear's home NEVER once crossed my mind.
TOTALLY agree with the youth sports stuff, too. I was a ref for FOURTH GRADE GIRLS INSTRUCTIONAL LEAGUE in Burlington, KY probably 6 or 8 years ago and on more than one occasion a parent(s) had to be kicked out of the gym.
Like most lefties, he fails to realize what the overturning of Rowe really means. It doesn’t make abortion illegal (though I wish it did). The Court wants to turn the issue over to the states and let the voting public decide the issue. How is that “going backwards”? It’s the most democratic thing that can happen. Lefties either don’t understand the situation or they’re worried that We the People won’t vote the way they want us too. Regardless, that’s true democracy.
I don't know what overturning Rowe means. You apparently don't know what overturning Roe means either though.
Also we aren't a democracy. We are a constitutional republic. I would just sit the rest of this out if I were you.
I know exactly what it means *******. It means exactly what I posted. It doesn’t make abortion illegal, but it does away with abortion being protected across the land. Again, if your thick skull can absorb it (read the leaked opinion), the intent of the court was to turn the issue over to a citizen vote.
And yes, we’re a constitutional/representative republic that has a democratic form of government: get it moron! And letting the citizenry decide an issue is the most democratic and fair way to settle any issue.
And oh my gosh, a W was inserted into Roe! That just makes all the difference in the world!
Last edited:
Oh boy, it's a **** post brought to you by the Political Thread. Want more of this? Look no further than the top of the page! I'll entertain your screwed up nonsense though.
Of course the riots and damage done was unacceptable. You'll find elected Dems who called for protests, but none called for riots. That's a talking point from the Political Thread. Dems indeed bitched constantly about Trump. Guess what? You and others are now doing the same about Biden (on every board on this site, what happened to stick to sports?) while wanting to sink his son and spread rumors that Biden is a pedo. You can't ***** about how the other side acted when you're up to the same twisted BS. What happened to just saying "meh, that guy sucks. Hope he doesn't get reelected." That's a both sides problem. You can downplay the insurrection all you want, but like the riots, it was a stain on the country and incredibly embarrassing as the world watched. You may hate some politicians, but they shouldn't be forced into hiding while people "voicing displeasure with a rigged election" (laughable lying excuse) went into the Capitol looking for targets, screaming threats, and leaving death threat notes on the desks of certain politicians. That's beyond unacceptable, and as I said to ThroughBlue, I knew that the further away we got from the insurrection taking place, some would downplay it and even support it happening. If that describes you, you're not a patriot, you're a predictable, hate-filled (dare I say) sheep. Have a pleasant tomorrow though.
Fact check: Missing context and mostly false.
According to the left these are protests and the 1st amendment guarantees that for public officials. The LAW that is being broken in VA is the intent to influence a judges decision. When cAndy was protested against he was not at his personal home, and was doing a TV broadcast explaining why he was putting these folks out of business.
So you aren’t smart enough to have a cogent argument when someone points out that you are wrong so you resort to name calling. I assumed you would be used to being wrong by now. You have gotten a lot of practice. What will you be wrong about next? Are you going to claim all the headshots on our money were pulled from their respective social media pages? Sounds like something you would claim.I know exactly what it means *******. It means exactly what I posted. It doesn’t make abortion illegal, but it does away with abortion being protected across the land. Again, if your thick skull can absorb it (read the leaked opinion), the intent of the court was to turn the issue over to a citizen vote.
And yes, we’re a constitutional/representative republic that has a democratic form of government: get it moron! And letting the citizenry decide an issue is the most democratic and fair way to settle any issue.
And oh my gosh, a W was inserted into Roe! That just makes all the difference in the world!
It’s cute when you try cupcake.
Like a normal person would be in person with a photo ID... You ok with that chief?
So why were elected dems bailing violent rioters out of jail and saying they were mostly peaceful protest? You can ignore reality but not the consequences of reality. $2billion in damage and almost nobody did jail time.
I'm saying claiming something is codified in law is a specious argument that has no bearing on reality.
Point out where I was wrong Scooter. You’re obviously nothing more than a smart *** troll.
Many Dem politicians threw gas on the fire of the riots by continually calling them peaceful protestors, establishing bail funds for those that were arrested, and telling them to confront and get in the faces of conservatives (Maxine Waters, AOC, Presley, and others). I watched them do it so don’t claim they didn’t. And many of the rioters were armed unlike those on Jan 6. Another fact. Spin it how you want to but you’ll still be wrong.
"Regardless of political stances" I'm going to **** on those I disagree with." I'm not sure you should ruin a good point by showing how indoctrinated you are into the far right. It is wrong to protest at someone's house, but to blame it on the left shows your blindness/ignorance of how this **** works. Both sides do it. They have been bombing abortion clinics for years. Is that better because you are on that side?
You are the expert on being wrong. However, the items you listed are also the things that were done for the Jan. 6 protestors. Most of the the Jan 6 protestors were armed. I watched them do it so don’t claim they didn’t. Another fact. Soon it how you want to but you’ll still be wrong. Like I said before, you have plenty of experience with that though pumpkin.
Triggered . Feeling superior ? Lol. .. you da man Bowie . Thanks for setting me straight on " how this **** works " . Well got to go , Got my masters level Q-Anon class to attend .
LOL. Not a single person involved in Jan 6 was armed. That’s a well published fact. Idiot.
That’s simply false. It was neither well published or a fact. Took less than 10 seconds to find these. There are plenty of others. Your streak of being wrong continues. I almost feel sorry for your dumb ***. How do you breath with your head so far up your ***?
Is that really the best you can do? You constantly spout of with completely false information and get called on it and then turn to personal attacks. That is an indictment on you not me. It must suck to go through life with such an inferiority complex and to know that virtually everyone is smarter than you. At least maybe the dog likes you. Probably would need to tie a pork chop around your neck for that to happen though.
Thanks for playing. You lose yet again. What other lies will you come up with to tout as "published fact"? Just know, whenever you do, I will be waiting to show that you are wrong yet again.
I don't condone protests in front of public officials private homes, however, the Governor's Mansion is directly next to the front lawn of the State Capitol building where the actual protest was taking place. Plus the Governor's Mansion isn't a private Residence. Beshear doesn't own it, the taxpayers of KY do. Therefore ANY protest of ANYTHING at the state Capitol building could theoretically be considered protesting in front of the Governor's house. Same goes for protests on the mall in DC. Pretty much the same as a protest in front of the President's house.
You're just used to seeing the posh digs of bought and paid for politicians. Judges are appointed and not subject to making millions off lobbyists and such.
So you would agree that the morality of a law has to be considered? So for instance... protesting outside a judges house to try to sway a court ruling would be immoral... just like slavery was immoral. So we can look at laws and justify keeping or ending them.
My take is only law that is based on the constitution. Morality is best left to the individual, not a government. I think by Constitution, it is legal to protest at a judges house. I think it is amoral to protest at a judges house and I would never do it. If your political opponents are going to perform amoral acts, you need to be prepared to perform them also, until they learn to behave better. That's why I suggested an armed march in front of all Democrat residences. Again, it's not something I would do, but if you want to do it, knock yourself out.