Do you think Nick Saban would give a flying 17 if he lost a WR coach?

FlotownDawg

All-American
Aug 30, 2012
6,842
7,169
113
It's a big difference because Brewster was far and away our best recruiter

While Saban is a master recruiter, Mullen has pretty much proven he can't recruit for ****. We need our assistant coaches to be great recruiters and we had one with Brewster. He single handedly pried Ross away from Oklahoma State at the last minute while Mullen and his lapdog Hevesy managed to lose Mix to Auburn. Brewster is going to be a big loss on the recruiting trail I'm afraid.
 

missouridawg

Junior
Oct 6, 2009
9,389
288
83
Losing Brewster hurts and there's no other argument against it.

Our program is set up to have great success over the next 5 to 10 years. I'm excited about our future. But if there is one thing that concerns me during that time frame, it's recruiting. Tim Brewster elevated our recruiting game in only 6 months on the job. If we had Brewster recruiting for us for 30 months, there's no telling what he could've done and what Dan could've learned from him.

I'm not going to lie... I've been Dan's biggest supporter since I saw his teams first take the field in 2009. He has done very, very little to make me waiver on him as a head coach... but if he doesn't figure out ways to get better recruits here, we're never going to compete for the SEC West.

Everything in our program has gotten better under Dan, including recruiting. But he's got to get recruiting to another level.
 

chew1095

Redshirt
Feb 1, 2009
2,039
0
0
Thats like comparing Steve 17ing Jobs to a Radio Shack franchisee.

ETA: sorry if I offended any Radio Shack franchisees.
 

o_fredgarvin

Redshirt
Jun 26, 2010
585
43
28
Did you really think a former D-I head coach was going to stay ...

at MSU as a WR coach? Maybe as a OC or DC, but not a position coach. We were a port in the storm. C'mon.