Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Alabama looking to recapture the 'standard' despite injuries
On3:
Chris Low joins On3 as Senior National College Football Reporter
On3:
Tennessee All-America CB Jermod McCoy to miss games, but working to get back
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
On3:
College football rule changes: Fake injury repercussions, overtime timeouts & more in 2025
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does anybody else think the UNC situation....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129550091" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>No, you are simply misrepresenting the facts. The NCAA has a certain procedure for handing out sanctions. They can't do it by the seat of their pants like you want. The NCAA has in fact followed normal procedure. They sent UNC a Notice of Allegations letter last fall. UNC has 90 days to respond, which they did. Then was scheduled for March. So no, the NCAA wasn't letting UNC get off. They had already started the procedure, and everything was progressing on schedule.</p><p></p><p>What extended the process is that UNC self-reported additional violations at the end of last year. Due to the rules of the investigation procedure, the NCAA <u><em>had</em></u> to reopen the investigation when the new violations were reported. There isn't any choice. They had to do it.</p><p></p><p>Now as to why UNC self-reported, I clearly explained that. UNC self-reported because they thought they could win the tournament this year, so they gambled on getting tougher sanctions in the future to win the national championship this year. If you want to say that's dirty by UNC, that's fine. The problem is, they can legally do that. UNC took advantage of a loophole.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, North Carolina is going to get sanctions. That's a foregone conclusion. The only question is how much and for how long.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not what I said. Don't twist my words. I didn't say the first investigation turned up the AFAM scandal. I said it led to it. The two main violations in the first investigation were agents paying players and tutors writing papers for players. After the NCAA ruling, the state of North Carolina conducted its own investigation for two reasons: 1) the state of North Carolina has criminal laws regulating the conduct of agents, 2) the state has oversight of UNC, obviously, so they investigated the academic charges as well. That's what led to the revelations of all the fraud in the AFAM classes. The problem is, the NCAA wasn't going to get anywhere near a state/federal investigation because of what happened with Miami. The NCAA conducted their own investigation, separate from the state of North Carolina. That's what accounts for the length of time. The NCAA was right to do that. They already got burned on the Miami case, so it would be stupid to make the same mistake again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129550091, member: 1459051"] No, you are simply misrepresenting the facts. The NCAA has a certain procedure for handing out sanctions. They can't do it by the seat of their pants like you want. The NCAA has in fact followed normal procedure. They sent UNC a Notice of Allegations letter last fall. UNC has 90 days to respond, which they did. Then was scheduled for March. So no, the NCAA wasn't letting UNC get off. They had already started the procedure, and everything was progressing on schedule. What extended the process is that UNC self-reported additional violations at the end of last year. Due to the rules of the investigation procedure, the NCAA [U][I]had[/I][/U] to reopen the investigation when the new violations were reported. There isn't any choice. They had to do it. Now as to why UNC self-reported, I clearly explained that. UNC self-reported because they thought they could win the tournament this year, so they gambled on getting tougher sanctions in the future to win the national championship this year. If you want to say that's dirty by UNC, that's fine. The problem is, they can legally do that. UNC took advantage of a loophole. Bottom line, North Carolina is going to get sanctions. That's a foregone conclusion. The only question is how much and for how long. That's not what I said. Don't twist my words. I didn't say the first investigation turned up the AFAM scandal. I said it led to it. The two main violations in the first investigation were agents paying players and tutors writing papers for players. After the NCAA ruling, the state of North Carolina conducted its own investigation for two reasons: 1) the state of North Carolina has criminal laws regulating the conduct of agents, 2) the state has oversight of UNC, obviously, so they investigated the academic charges as well. That's what led to the revelations of all the fraud in the AFAM classes. The problem is, the NCAA wasn't going to get anywhere near a state/federal investigation because of what happened with Miami. The NCAA conducted their own investigation, separate from the state of North Carolina. That's what accounts for the length of time. The NCAA was right to do that. They already got burned on the Miami case, so it would be stupid to make the same mistake again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does anybody else think the UNC situation....
Top
Bottom