Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College football insider: Latest intel on QB battles, injuries, transfer buzz and more
On3:
College football coaching carousel expected to heat up in 2025
On3:
Will Toledo upset Kentucky in Week 1? Jason Candle betting on consistency in transfer portal era
On3:
After NCAA uncertainty, Rahsul Faison’s waiver approval paves way for South Carolina debut
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does BC continue to do stay in P5?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xWVU2010x" data-source="post: 129526600" data-attributes="member: 1467482"><p>Not sure how you see this playing out, but when (and I agree it is when not if) the compensation policy changes, it is going to be something like this:</p><p></p><p>Option A - Increased stipends across the board, per player in each sport this will not be that much money but collectively it will cost the schools a lot, however it is not going to be crippling to an AD.</p><p>Option B - Allow 3rd parties (donors) to pay what the market dictates to a player, allowing schools to bypass paying anybody.</p><p>Option C - Allow players to profit off of their likeness by way of a royalty, which means that only the guys good enough to warrant jersey/t shirt sales will be profiting, allowing schools to bypass paying pretty much everyone other than the star player(s).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xWVU2010x, post: 129526600, member: 1467482"] Not sure how you see this playing out, but when (and I agree it is when not if) the compensation policy changes, it is going to be something like this: Option A - Increased stipends across the board, per player in each sport this will not be that much money but collectively it will cost the schools a lot, however it is not going to be crippling to an AD. Option B - Allow 3rd parties (donors) to pay what the market dictates to a player, allowing schools to bypass paying anybody. Option C - Allow players to profit off of their likeness by way of a royalty, which means that only the guys good enough to warrant jersey/t shirt sales will be profiting, allowing schools to bypass paying pretty much everyone other than the star player(s). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does BC continue to do stay in P5?
Top
Bottom