Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College football insider: Latest intel on QB battles, injuries, transfer buzz and more
On3:
College football coaching carousel expected to heat up in 2025
On3:
Will Toledo upset Kentucky in Week 1? Jason Candle betting on consistency in transfer portal era
On3:
After NCAA uncertainty, Rahsul Faison’s waiver approval paves way for South Carolina debut
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does BC continue to do stay in P5?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129526945" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>You are the one that brought up the ACC network. You said that the ACC wouldn't get a network because it didn't have good ratings. I was pointing out that the ACC had solid (not spectacular), and I was using the Big 12 as a reference point, given the talk on here about a Big 12 network.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the ACC's numbers being "skewered," they aren't. The networks don't care <em>how</em> a conference delivers ratings. They just care <em>what</em> the ratings are. Also keep in mind that some of Notre Dame's games are now part of the ACC, so some of them factor into this as well. Thing is, that's exactly why Notre Dame was added. If the ACC ever got a network, Notre Dame would sometimes appear on the network. Again, it goes back to my point. It doesn't matter <em>how </em>you get the ratings. It just matters <em>what</em> the ratings are.</p><p></p><p>One more point about the ratings being skewered. If you want to say the ACC is a two horse league, that's fine. However, in the past two year, the Big 12 did not have a single game in the top 10 of the ratings, whereas the ACC had 3 in 2015 <a href="http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2015/12/21/10636988/sec-big-10-dominate-college-football-tv-ratings">http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2015/12/21/10636988/sec-big-10-dominate-college-football-tv-ratings</a>, and 4 in 2014 <a href="http://texags.com/s/15550/infographic-2014-college-football-tv-ratings">http://texags.com/s/15550/infographic-2014-college-football-tv-ratings</a>. My point is, you're trying to tell me how bad the ACC's ratings are, and thus will prevent them from getting a network, but the facts aren't backing up either of your points.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I posted a link to where I got the numbers for every season. Anyone is free to look at them. The numbers in 2015 were up across the board, not just for the ACC and Big 12, but for all conferences proportionally.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129526945, member: 1459051"] You are the one that brought up the ACC network. You said that the ACC wouldn't get a network because it didn't have good ratings. I was pointing out that the ACC had solid (not spectacular), and I was using the Big 12 as a reference point, given the talk on here about a Big 12 network. Regarding the ACC's numbers being "skewered," they aren't. The networks don't care [I]how[/I] a conference delivers ratings. They just care [I]what[/I] the ratings are. Also keep in mind that some of Notre Dame's games are now part of the ACC, so some of them factor into this as well. Thing is, that's exactly why Notre Dame was added. If the ACC ever got a network, Notre Dame would sometimes appear on the network. Again, it goes back to my point. It doesn't matter [I]how [/I]you get the ratings. It just matters [I]what[/I] the ratings are. One more point about the ratings being skewered. If you want to say the ACC is a two horse league, that's fine. However, in the past two year, the Big 12 did not have a single game in the top 10 of the ratings, whereas the ACC had 3 in 2015 [URL]http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2015/12/21/10636988/sec-big-10-dominate-college-football-tv-ratings[/URL], and 4 in 2014 [URL]http://texags.com/s/15550/infographic-2014-college-football-tv-ratings[/URL]. My point is, you're trying to tell me how bad the ACC's ratings are, and thus will prevent them from getting a network, but the facts aren't backing up either of your points. I posted a link to where I got the numbers for every season. Anyone is free to look at them. The numbers in 2015 were up across the board, not just for the ACC and Big 12, but for all conferences proportionally. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does BC continue to do stay in P5?
Top
Bottom