Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="michaelwalkerbr" data-source="post: 129528438" data-attributes="member: 1601483">Sorry for voicing my opinion on something that pushes your buttons, I should know better by now. At least you remained civil, thank you for that. If it were important to me I would have a copy of anything related to the matter, but it's not. I am not naive enough to expect this to be the final word on the subject, but it is my final word. FSU only drew 39,000 fans in 45,000 seat Alumni Stadium. Notre Dame managed to sell out Fenway Park with 38,000 fans. People in Florida and many parts of the nation may have tuned in to those games to see FSU and ND, but the fans in Massachusetts apparently no longer care.FSU and Notre Dame will draw a significant TV viewership regardless of where they play. Massachusetts is apparently the exception. Boston does not help the ACC, nor would it likely help any other conference. They would probably do better playing at Temple with the Philadelphia TV market.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="michaelwalkerbr, post: 129528438, member: 1601483"] Sorry for voicing my opinion on something that pushes your buttons, I should know better by now. At least you remained civil, thank you for that. If it were important to me I would have a copy of anything related to the matter, but it's not. I am not naive enough to expect this to be the final word on the subject, but it is my final word. [B][U]FSU only drew 39,000 fans in 45,000 seat Alumni Stadium.[/U][/B] Notre Dame managed to sell out Fenway Park with 38,000 fans. People in Florida and many parts of the nation may have tuned in to those games to see FSU and ND, but the fans in Massachusetts apparently no longer care. FSU and Notre Dame will draw a significant TV viewership regardless of where they play. Massachusetts is apparently the exception. Boston does not help the ACC, nor would it likely help any other conference. They would probably do better playing at Temple with the Philadelphia TV market. [/QUOTE]

Name