Does LSU ever benefit from a damn replay
- Thread starter Stallion4Tiiigaaahhhs
- Start date
Although I do agree that the end result reflected what <span style="font-style: italic;">likely</span> happened - which is the receiver was down before the strip. However, the officials have been instructed to defend the call on the field. That call has been upheld all damn year. I don't think it was inconclusive evidence to overturn based on how we've seen the replay officials make decisions all year. If that call had enough evidence to be reversed, then the "inconclusive evidence" decisions rendered against MSU this season are complete 17-ing garbage. Not only do they suck, they are inconsistent as well.
LSU's 1st touchdown says it all.
A ticky-tack block in the back call against Ole Miss followed by a "jumping into the endzone while a defender is trying to tackle the runner" personal foul on the same play. Both calls were total ********. This followed a play or two later by an out of bounds call on an Ole Miss receiver who was pushed out of bounds then came in to catch a touchdown pass. Again, total ********. All this followed by a blocked FG attempt that gets returned for a TD.
A ticky-tack block in the back call against Ole Miss followed by a "jumping into the endzone while a defender is trying to tackle the runner" personal foul on the same play. Both calls were total ********. This followed a play or two later by an out of bounds call on an Ole Miss receiver who was pushed out of bounds then came in to catch a touchdown pass. Again, total ********. All this followed by a blocked FG attempt that gets returned for a TD.
That penalty was a good call. It may have not been devastating but that was enough to finish off the run.
