I didn't say we would win for sure but I guarantee you it would of been a bigger game than that of the badgers
You're correct sir. But i don't think any of us will ever witness something like that again from a power conference teamYou're only speculating. Of course, we'll never know because uk was unable to hold up their part of the bargain.
I like how you throw the "power conference" out there as if it makes it more impressive that Kentucky went undefeated in the SEC. Duke may not have went undefeated in the ACC, but they did go undefeated outside of the ACC. I will take that any day over winning 38 in a row.You're correct sir. But i don't think any of us will ever witness something like that again from a power conference team
My reference is to that of the witcha states of the world. When you play mostly church league talent outside of your conference, you tend to go undefeatedI like how you throw the "power conference" out there as if it makes it more impressive that Kentucky went undefeated in the SEC. Duke may not have went undefeated in the ACC, but they did go undefeated outside of the ACC. I will take that any day over winning 38 in a row.
While this reputation exists, I think it's overblown. The SEC is simply less skilled than other big conferences. SEC teams are still loaded with tall, strong and fast guys. It is a physical grind, but skilled teams will do well against them. When those athletic squads do get hot, and do shoot the occasional 40% from deep, they are tough to beat. Rebounding and D is pretty strong in SEC country.The SEC has garnered a reputation as somewhat of a "church league" the last few years.
The championships won in the late 40's and early 50's were NIT championships because the NIT was the big tournament back then so how are they NCAA championships? furthermore those championships were won because of point shaving so I really don't know how those are even counted.UK fans love to talk about those 8 championships as if they had a beating heart for half of them. I am more proud to know that I was not only alive for all five of Duke's championships, but I witnessed them as well.
It is really grinding their gears that K is wearing their asses out on the recruiting trail. Did anyone from our board go over to RR and assess their class??
OFC
That was 1 year not every yr, btw when you win 38 straight or go 40-0 against the teams we did I'll be the first one to congratulate you
You know we beat the Badgers and went on to win it but if we had played you the scenario would have been different? This isn't the part where you tell us if we had played you you would have won is it?
I try to respect everyone here. We disagree because we have a rivalry, so I enjoy the talk. I know being a uk fan I'm automatically an enemy, but calling players athletic apes is just ignorant. I think most would agree hereFirst of all, the guy you're replying to is an idiot. But so are you. You're not smart enough to have this conversation so just give up and leave. Thanks.
I'm sure your duke brethren will love your reference to student athletes as "athletic apes." You will be criticized for that stupid remark.
1. NO sane uk fan is calling 40-0 ever again. The only reason it was ever brought up was due to our success in 2015. Show me 1 true uk fan than says it seriously we will go 40-0.
2. Developing 4 year players ok. How about josh harrelson who got drafted while plumber continues to develop. Derek wills another 4 yr guy who could very well be drafted next year. Alex poythress was pretty damn good before his knee injury but graduated in 3 years for being an athletic ape. Sometimes you get guys that could of went to Harvard for free like Brandon knight because they are so damn smart. Point is you have a small window to make your money and some guys leave early.
3. This isn't 1995 anymore where Garnett being the 2nd player to jump to the nba. The come to duke and be set for life pitch is bs unless you're aspiring to be an ESPN analyst. How much money you think duke will send thorton and his family since he supposed to be set for life? Kids today want the fastest and best way to reach their dreams. Which include fortune, fame, and the nba.
"WE" don't have a rivalry. Your rival is Louisville. Ours is the cheaters.I try to respect everyone here. We disagree because we have a rivalry, so I enjoy the talk. I know being a uk fan I'm automatically an enemy, but calling players athletic apes is just ignorant. I think most would agree here
The come to duke and be set for life pitch is bs unless you're aspiring to be an ESPN analyst. How much money you think duke will send thorton and his family since he supposed to be set for life? Kids today want the fastest and best way to reach their dreams. Which include fortune, fame, and the nba.
UK fans love to talk about those 8 championships as if they had a beating heart for half of them. I am more proud to know that I was not only alive for all five of Duke's championships, but I witnessed them as well.
The championships won in the late 40's and early 50's were NIT championships because the NIT was the big tournament back then so how are they NCAA championships?..... furthermore those championships were won because of point shaving so I really don't know how those are even counted. Please explain......Dukies are usually smarter than that comment...
The point shaving scandal was discovered in 1951, but had ultimately been goin on since 1947. I know UK took a big hit in the 1952-53 season, but what I was trying to say is how did those championships won in the late 40's count because that was when the point shaving was taking place.I'm (also) proud to know that I was alive for all UK NCAA wins and NIT wins.
Just for the record. UK's NIT win in '46 is in addition to the 8 NCAA titles , not a part of them. As you stated the NIT was considered a better tourney back then. As UK had at least 3 players guilty of point shaving, they missed out on an opportunity for more titles............................. (explain to me how you championships were won by point shavings.........actually games were lost due to the act)..................
I'm not in the debate of who has the best rated recruiting class each year or the best team at the end of the year or best of modern era........We can all read the results and decide for ourselves.
Denver: Screw all this basketball nonsense. Kentucky makes the best bourbon. Not even the most die hard Dukie can argue with that. As a matter of fact, I think it's time for one.This will be the year UK and Duke meet in the Final Four. Ultimate bragging rights!
One player that hasn't earned it? Does lance Thomas and his jewelry get a pass?40-0 talk was before 2015. But I don't really care about that. I wish people had enough sense to understand the set for life idea. If you think that it means just by committing to Duke you will be set for life, you're the idiot not Krzyzewski. There hasn't been one player that was handed anything without earning it. And finally, just shut up about Thornton. You Kentucky people want to use his situation to mock Krzyzewski's pitch, but that's no real surprise seeing how you can't even comprehend his pitch.
The point shaving scandal was discovered in 1951, but had ultimately been goin on since 1947. ........History states that it only happened in the '48-'49 season.......a year that UK lost in the NIT (PLAN BACKFIRED)..but won the NCAA...Took NCAA 4 years to announce penalize....The '54 team took the real penalty. After being allowed to play the season..25-0.. ...3 players were declared ineligble for the tourney ,thus UK declined the invitation....2 AA's in Ramsey ann Hagan.. I know UK took a big hit in the 1952-53 season, but what I was trying to say is how did those championships won in the late 40's count because that was when the point shaving was taking place.
One player that hasn't earned it? Does lance Thomas and his jewelry get a pass?
One decent big? Cmon now.Guys just don't see Kentucky being that good, one decent big guy, when Bam gets in to foul trouble who takes his spot. The 3 spot for them is a joke Briscoe is not a 3 man, Willis is to slow, same thing with Gab. They will be a solid team, hope and pray Duke plays them so we can destroy them lol
One player that hasn't earned it? Does lance Thomas and his jewelry get a pass?
Guys just don't see Kentucky being that good, one decent big guy, when Bam gets in to foul trouble who takes his spot. The 3 spot for them is a joke Briscoe is not a 3 man, Willis is to slow, same thing with Gab. They will be a solid team, hope and pray Duke plays them so we can destroy them lol
A lot of "if's". After Fr year of Skal and to a lesser extent Briscoe, I'm not so sure anymore.
Our year depends on many Frs having excellent years together, plus Briscoe learning to shoot and Willis having a good year.
UK fans love to talk about those 8 championships as if they had a beating heart for half of them. I am more proud to know that I was not only alive for all five of Duke's championships, but I witnessed them as well.
One player that hasn't earned it? Does lance Thomas and his jewelry get a pass?
What have I done to be in trouble? I'm giving my opinion. And stating some factsI doubt you'll get many more passes as your constant drift toward total asshat is almost complete.
What have I done to be in trouble? I'm giving my opinion. And stating some facts
What have I done to be in trouble? I'm giving my opinion. And stating some facts
Not just that, but we criticize thr for their dumbass moderating, why ban someone for simply being a fan of another team? Unless he becomes a huge troll or disrespectful, he should be able to entertain us.Why ban him.His idiotic comments are entertaining in the off season when nothing is really happening