What if your description is dumb? The situations are not completely different. They are similar.Because the Roof and Flanagan situations are completely different, as I describe to some degree in Post #19 in this thread.
What if your description is dumb? The situations are not completely different. They are similar.Because the Roof and Flanagan situations are completely different, as I describe to some degree in Post #19 in this thread.
What if your description is dumb? The situations are not completely different. They are similar.
Libs don't want to know facts. They focus only on emotion. Flanagan was racist yet Libs can't bring themselves to acknowledge the facts. I've rarely seen such willfull ignorance, but when I do, they are always Libs.
Flanagan was racist, amongst AllKindsOfOtherBadStuff-ist. No doubt about that. Willful ignorance is equating this 41 year old guy that became more and more screwed up in various ways through his life with some 20 year old guy that was never anything other than a white supremacist and that killed a bunch of black people he didn't even know solely because they were black.
He wasn't a racist because he was 41. Lmao.Flanagan was racist, amongst AllKindsOfOtherBadStuff-ist. No doubt about that. Willful ignorance is equating this 41 year old guy that became more and more screwed up in various ways through his life with some 20 year old guy that was never anything other than a white supremacist and that killed a bunch of black people he didn't even know solely because they were black.
And yet you complain that no one (or that not enough are) is calling him a racist but you complain and whine alot so this is nothing new. To your original question, are you this challenged? Mr. Roof's murder spree was solely about race and he killed more people in a black church no less. Racism was just part of the Flanagan story. I'd say that none of this would have happened if he hadn't have been fired from the tv job. Also he was upset at these specific people who he thought had done him wrong so racism was not the sole reason as in the Roof case. Roof had pictures of himself drapped in the confederate flag so that aspect was drug into it. The cases are different and will be covered differently. Deal with it.ABC reported that he wanted to start a race war. Even Don Lemon of CNN agrees that he was a racist.
Roof had pictures of himself drapped in the confederate flag
https://www.google.com/search?q=dyl...UkAOY#tbm=isch&q=dylann+roof+confederate+flagLink? I don't recall that.
Because the White people who control the media hate White people.Dylan Roof was obviously a racist and the media treated him accordingly. They even took on the confederate flag because it appeared in one of his photos. Vester Flanagan wanted to start a race war. He was a racist and wanted to kill white people. Yet you are hard pressed to find any media outlet reporting on Flanagan's racism with any near the fervor of Roof's reporting. Some have completely ignored Flanagan's racial motives. Wonder why?
He wasn't a racist because he was 41. Lmao.
https://www.google.com/search?q=dyl...UkAOY#tbm=isch&q=dylann+roof+confederate+flag
Google is your friend. Thought I'd seen it wrapped around him but here's plenty with him displaying it. You get the idea.
What's your point? DR is a racist murderer who, among other things, enjoys displaying the confederate flag. Who cares how he displays it? Sorry if I mischaracterized your hero.Ok, I recalled him with flags, but not wrapped in it. You were wrong. Got it.
What's your point? DR is a racist murderer who, among other things, enjoys displaying the confederate flag. Who cares how he displays it? Sorry if I mischaracterized your hero.
Of course words have meaning, so I ask you how does that change meaning of my original post that you commented on if he's just holding or otherwise displaying the Confederate flag as opposed to being drapped in it? What was the purpose of you questioning that aspect of my post? Are you going around and "fact checking" everyone's post in every thread? Are you stalking me? Are you a supporter of DR and my description of his flag display made him sound worse than he really is and that bothered you enough to make your comment? Are you lonely and seeking attention (from me)? And no, I don't mind being wrong about something as inconsequential as what you've pointed out.So words don't mean things to you either. And you hate being wrong. Got it.
Of course words have meaning, so I ask you how does that change meaning of my original post that you commented on if he's just holding or otherwise displaying the Confederate flag as opposed to being drapped in it? What was the purpose of you questioning that aspect of my post? Are you going around and "fact checking" everyone's post in every thread? Are you stalking me? Are you a supporter of DR and my description of his flag display made him sound worse than he really is and that bothered you enough to make your comment? Are you lonely and seeking attention (from me)? And no, I don't mind being wrong about something as inconsequential as what you've pointed out.
Hey, go stalk someone else, K? smhNo I'm not fact-checking everyone on a consistent basis. I just read very dramatic and artistic words from a usually not artistic person, and didn't recall that being correct. You were using the dramatic vocabulary to tie the confederate flag to racism in what you thought wouldn't be called out. Since "shown with" or "displayed with" certainly doesn't have the same tone as "being draped in".