End of the Patrick Towels Era

Wall2Boogie

Heisman
Jan 28, 2010
26,239
21,732
0
Towles=hartline. Towles is not the answer. You gotta see what barker can do. He can't be any worse than what we have witnessed the last few weeks with towles running the show.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,630
0
Drew obviously hasn't shown what the coaches want to see in practices.

But PT needs to sit. Drew will just learn on the job, cant do any worse than the Coordinators who have been doing this all season.

Time to start benching wr's for drops as well.
Practice!!!...WE TALKING BOUT PRACTICE:joy::joy::joy::sunglasses:[banana][banana]
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Brian, I just couldn't disagree with you more. It doesn't matter how great the players are around Towles he just isn't a elite QB. You neglect the fact some of his biggest mistakes have come when he's had plenty of time to throw the ball. If he goes to UGA, etc. does that help with his accuracy? Dawson said it himself...you don't teach a player entering college to throw an accurate ball. It's there at that point or it isn't.

You talk about giving him the continuity with the same OC for 4 years....do you remember how Towles career has progressed? He came into college with MAJOR flaws in his passing motion. He played sparingly as a freshman and redshirted as a sophmore because he was last on the depth chart to Max Smith and Whitlow for Gods sake. The only reason he ever got on the field AT ALL was because he hired a QB guru to help him fix how he threw(which i give him major props for). But the tweaking has gone as far as it can...you don't teach accuracy, you don't teach processing info quickly...He wasn't going to be a first round draft pick or any draft pick in my opinion regardless of the talent around him.

The NFL will love tangibles like his...but at the end of the day that won't mean squat given his limitations


I just think if had the same system for four years and better players around him he would be better and hide many flaws (not saying he they would get better).

We have seen multiple QBs taken high than turn out to be just big arms because their flaws in college were hidden due to better players, system, etc. We have seen dozens upon dozens and that is where PT would be in my opinion.
 

dnabbott25

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2003
9,332
1,550
0
Bakers deserves heat. He is GOD AWEFUL. That guy is nothing more than a big kid, with a big mouth, known for smack talking in practice. He COST us 2 wins, litterally. Where is Blake Bone? Give him the passes like last year. Bench Baker. I dont care if you need him to block, fine, then only play him on run plays. He is HORRIBLE
 

UK till Death

All-American
Dec 21, 2012
10,529
8,655
0
Totally different offenses. Dink and dunk does not compare.

I have been in Commonwealth since the 70's seen a bunch of bad olines as well.


You guys are ignoring my words regarding his panicking ways and totally missing my point.

We agree with these issues.

My points, again, the lack of even decent oline play is part of the cause his accuracy is off AND he doesnt show well under pressure.

With time he can stay in the pocket and make some great ooh ahh throws.

That is what the scouts see.

You guys are going by watching UF, UT, UA and the likes kill him. His brain is fried on top of his already known discrepancies.


Slow down and TRY to see what someone else is saying.


He has issues.


But in my opinion, and you dont have to agree, but i think the scouts would super love him had he:

Been at a quality program with one OC and one system for 4 years.

A good oline that limited his under pressure moments which we all agree he doesnt handle well AND would prevent him from locking in on one receiver and rushing throws behind wr's.

Throws that are a little bit off might actually get caught by better wr's.

A great run game would bring 8 in the box, now he has to face 8 in the secondary.


My point is his major flaws would be very much limited in this type of setting along with the continuity over 4 years.

Now when he gets drafted by some suck NFL team it may not be pretty.


Why is this so hard to believe the possibility of such a scenario?
You related to the guy?

Good lord! Give it a rest!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmaso44
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
Screenshot Bakers drops and you will see how many are actually really bad drops.

We have had the fewest circus/toughest catches in the league.

Hes had bad drops. But most have just been tough catches that he should have made.

In the circus catches category, I can think of 2 Baker had, and one Badet had. Seems like Juice had 1 too. Im not sure how many circus catches youre expecting per season, but considering the fairly low number of pass attempts; 3 or so is quite a bit.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
There's no school PT could have went to that could have turned him into a 1st round pick. I doubt there's even a school that could have made him a 4th round pick. He has the size, but he doesn't have the intellectual acuity to play the QB position at a high level. If he'd originally went to another p5 school, he'd likely never started.

He hasn't had much help here, we can all agree on that, but he's the primary source of his own detriment.

Kid was highly rated and has all the physical tools.

Both posts are exactly correct. Towles has all the physical tools anyone could ever hope for in a QB. But he lacks most of the mental tools necessary to succeed. His incredible physical tools has been enough temptation for this staff to invest their futures and the programs futures into trying to develop the cognitive aspects of his game. Its just not happened.

Agreed.

The way you know that's not the case is that the only way any one can draw up a scenario where pat succeeds is when literally every other position on the field is manned by elite players.


That's not the makings of an elite QB.

Exactly. When posters repeat "well hed be great if he had elite everything surrounding him" they should realize theyre actually making an argument against a player. A good player doesnt need the perfect situation to be effective.

Its all in the mindset.

You guys havent like PT for awhile.

You want to look right.

False. We all love him. We all want him to succeed. He just isnt. I dont care about looking right to random anonymous internet message board posters. I want to see my team win, Towles just doesnt give us the best chance. He said it himself. What more do you need?

I take no pleasure in seeing Patrick Towles struggle. He seems to love Kentucky and wants the team to do well. He has been given a difficult task and has struggled with it.

I'm also glad to see several staunch Patrick Towles defenders/cheerleaders finally saying "no mas" and agree it's time to give someone else a shot. What I don't see from them though, is apologies for absolutely attacking ANYONE who said something even SLIGHTLY negative about Towles up to this point. Not every Towles defender acted this way, but most did.

I've seen several posters make criticisms that I thought were fair and then watched 3 or 4 Towles defenders rip the poster apart and behave like children rather than have a well-reasoned dialogue. I've also seen some Towles haters make up or exaggerate shortcomings and not be able to recognize the good things that Towles has done. The Towles defenders were either unable or unwilling to distinguish the reasonable fans from the not so reasonable ones.

Kentucky fans should be able to say critical things about their favorite football team without having the self-appointed program defenders introduce the "you're not a real fan if you say something critical" or the "he's blameless" arguments because neither one is true. If someone is taking the time to post on this board, they are either trolls with no lives or big Kentucky (or SEC football) fans. They should be able to be critical and not be attacked.

Excellent post.
 

sgt4269

Freshman
Apr 4, 2006
373
93
0
The root of the problem isn't so much the QB as it is the o line. Barker won't be any better if other teams D can easily get to him in mere seconds. Look how pat performs when he has time...
Some of this can be attributed to poor play calling as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Drewmagnum

Sophomore
Sep 5, 2002
824
166
43
I'm not talking about one pass. People thought the UF pass, the AU pass, the EKU passes all had to be incredible plays, but they really were not. And many more. Much of this is the PT hate blindness

I'm not going to sugar coat these. These guys must catch catchable balls. One or two is understandable, one or two a game..not.

Baker's first 3 drops resulted in 3 TDs immediately after in huge games.

We have dropped easy catches and not stepped up to make great ones.

In fact I can name only 2 off the top of my head - Bakers one hander on the sideline and Bidets diving TD.


We need the change at QB but wr's must get better, Barkers first pass hit him in the chest for pete's sake!

I agree. Barker hit Baker perfectly on a back shoulder throw. Seems to me Baker has regressed a bit this season. I have noticed Baker drawing single coverage quite a bit also. Maybe the biggest problem with our receivers is they just don't get open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Real Deal 2

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
10,773
11,887
113
I just think if had the same system for four years and better players around him he would be better and hide many flaws (not saying he they would get better).

We have seen multiple QBs taken high than turn out to be just big arms because their flaws in college were hidden due to better players, system, etc. We have seen dozens upon dozens and that is where PT would be in my opinion.
This is a stretch, the Dawson and Brown offense are virtually the same, I mean this is a big stretch on your part, you act like this was a big switch that PT has had to endure, going from I formation or 2 TE offense or option offense. Air Raid is all the same for most part, this does not hold up at all in your arguments. The switch to Dawson was very pedestrian, they all have the same automatic calls when 7 guys are in the box or they all have the same auto calls with 6 in a box etc.. Maybe Dawson relies on deeper routes or does not throw the screen as much. This is strictly a PT problem compounded by factors as drops, bad OL play, Dawson not really knowing what the hell is going at times and not being on same page. I give PT that, he has been affected by terrible play to go around. He has not played well at all but this is not about that. It is about this program needing a jolt and a lift, it is about Stoops saving this team and not letting this thing get away from him, not sure he can recover if he does not make bowl. IT is time for a change to shake up, again not sure Barker is better but we have to shake up.

I think Stoops tried to go with PT because he knows this is the end of the era, once you make the change than you lose PT and he knows it. He hated to switch and this is why he waited so long. He knows this is it when this switch comes about. Stoops is caring for his guy and going the extra mile.
IMO
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
It is about this program needing a jolt and a lift, it is about Stoops saving this team and not letting this thing get away from him, not sure he can recover if he does not make bowl. IT is time for a change to shake up, again not sure Barker is better but we have to shake up.

I think Stoops tried to go with PT because he knows this is the end of the era, once you make the change than you lose PT and he knows it. He hated to switch and this is why he waited so long. He knows this is it when this switch comes about. Stoops is caring for his guy and going the extra mile.

I think youre exactly right. Thats also why several fans, me included, hate to see Towles not be able to live up to his incredible potential. Pretty gut wrenching to see the kid himself suggest in an interview its time to look at someone else. But says alot about what his character, which everyone agrees is terrific.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
yes many strong armed QBs have been taken in round one and were not great QBs, you know this.

Can you name one who struggled as badly in college as Towles has thus far? I sure can't think of any.

You're playing a false equivalency game here. Sure, there have been plenty of big armed busts cut in the Ryan Leaf mold taken in Round 1 over the years. But the difference is at the COLLEGE level those guys kicked ***, they didn't get exposed until they faced pro competition. College defenses were no problem for them.

Conversely, Towles does not even seem to be able to handle the complexity of these college defenses. His decision-making appears too slow, and his passing far too inaccurate and inconsistent, for even high college level ball. He's already been exposed before ever facing that next level. He's been a whole different level of bad than the guys you're trying to compare him too.

Seems like your whole argument here is based on the fact that Towles is big and strong with a real powerful arm. Well, you know, that's all nice, but it alone ain't nearly enough to make a QB a top draft pick. Busts like Leaf didn't get drafted high solely because they were big and strong-armed, it was also because they kicked *** on the field and were stars at the college level.
 
Last edited:

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Both posts are exactly correct. Towles has all the physical tools anyone could ever hope for in a QB. But he lacks most of the mental tools necessary to succeed. His incredible physical tools has been enough temptation for this staff to invest their futures and the programs futures into trying to develop the cognitive aspects of his game. Its just not happened.



Exactly. When posters repeat "well hed be great if he had elite everything surrounding him" they should realize theyre actually making an argument against a player. A good player doesnt need the perfect situation to be effective.


Excellent post.


This what you guys are not grasping.

I am agreeing with you on his negatives, his faults.

My only point is they are magnified by the different schemes each year, poor oline and drops.

With 4 years in same system, his liabilities would not have been so pronounced and these experts who love him so much today would really love him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Schwump

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
This is a stretch, the Dawson and Brown offense are virtually the same, I mean this is a big stretch on your part, you act like this was a big switch that PT has had to endure, going from I formation or 2 TE offense or option offense. Air Raid is all the same for most part, this does not hold up at all in your arguments. The switch to Dawson was very pedestrian, they all have the same automatic calls when 7 guys are in the box or they all have the same auto calls with 6 in a box etc.. Maybe Dawson relies on deeper routes or does not throw the screen as much. This is strictly a PT problem compounded by factors as drops, bad OL play, Dawson not really knowing what the hell is going at times and not being on same page. I give PT that, he has been affected by terrible play to go around. He has not played well at all but this is not about that. It is about this program needing a jolt and a lift, it is about Stoops saving this team and not letting this thing get away from him, not sure he can recover if he does not make bowl. IT is time for a change to shake up, again not sure Barker is better but we have to shake up.

I think Stoops tried to go with PT because he knows this is the end of the era, once you make the change than you lose PT and he knows it. He hated to switch and this is why he waited so long. He knows this is it when this switch comes about. Stoops is caring for his guy and going the extra mile.
IMO



Still a switch Real Deal, and like you said Dawson requires more time in the pocket than NB did, thus more pressure, thus PT's inability to handle pressure.

I am not saying the kid is great, I'm just saying he has great tools and that a better program would mask those much better than we have.

Not a stretch in my opinion.

You guys saying he would suck even at UGA is the stretch in my mind.

Here is has very poor blocking against 4 man fronts, multiple drops, poor running game.

UGA great blocking, better wr's, excellent running game, 8 guys in the box, not in the defensive backfield waiting to snag a pick or preventing wr's from getting open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GJNorman

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Can you name one who struggled as badly in college as Towles has thus far? I sure can't think of any.

You're playing a false equivalency game here. Sure, there have been plenty of big armed busts cut in the Ryan Leaf mold taken in Round 1 over the years. But the difference is at the COLLEGE level those guys kicked ***, they didn't get exposed until they faced pro competition. College defenses were no problem for them.

Conversely, Towles does not even seem to be able to handle the complexity of these college defenses. His decision-making appears too slow, and his passing far too inaccurate and inconsistent, for even high college level ball. He's already been exposed before ever facing that next level. He's been a whole different level of bad than the guys you're trying to compare him too.

Seems like your whole argument here is based on the fact that Towles is big and strong with a real powerful arm. Well, you know, that's all nice, but it alone ain't nearly enough to make a QB a top draft pick. Busts like Leaf didn't get drafted high solely because they were big and strong-armed, it was also because they kicked *** on the field and were stars at the college level.


Really? I said if PT was on another team ala UGA he wouldnt struggle as much, how do you miss that?
 
Last edited:

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,814
0
Really? I said if PT was on another team ala UGA he wouldnt struggle as much.

No, what you actually said was that if he was on a team like UGA he'd be a "first rounder this year." Others contested that belief as absurd, and you've responded with no cogent or convincing argument to back it up.

So now I'll go back to my prior question you dodged: Can you name me a first rounder who struggled as badly in college as Patrick has thus far? You seemed to be suggesting that there have been other first rounders like him, well ...can you give examples?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmaso44

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
@UK till Death
@bigblueinsanity
@Real Deal 2
@UK90


First off, i like you guys and have for years.

But my gosh you people are being hard headed.


We all agree on PT's faults. Ok?

Now, stop bathing yourselves in your lust for being right about how bad a player is and try to see another opinion.


My only statement is that in my opinion the guy could/would mask a bunch of his issues being on a team like UGA.

If these experts believe he is a top 3 Junior QB now, they would really love him at UGA.


ANY QB WOULD DO BETTER UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES:

Same system and coaches for 4 years. (Yes even better than 2 OC's with similar systems)

A great oline. For a QB like PT the less pressure the better.

A great running game, brings more defenders in the box and thus less covering wr's.

Better wr's to catch balls right at them and some inaccurate passes as well.


NOW ADD IN PT'S PHYSICAL CAPABILITIES WITH THESE CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE SCOUTS LOVE HIM EVEN MORE.

Would he still have a hard time with pre-reads? Maybe, not a definite if he had solid coaching in ONE system for 4 years.

Would his accuracy be as bad? Maybe, I am not foolish enough to say he is an accurate passer, but I am not blind enough to see that the constant pressure has caused him to hurry passes which in turn have been poorly thrown.

Would he handle pressure better? Most likely not, his pocket presence and feel are just not there, however he would have much less pressure with a better oline, so that would be masked a bit.

Would he be a better leader? Doubt it, he just does not seem to be confident enough, or vocal enough. But a UGA would have several capable leaders.


Thus my simple take was if he was at a UGA all these magnified flaws we see now would be hidden much more at a UGA and these crazy scouts who love him now would swoon over him even more.

Not a reach, not a stretch, just an opinion.

If you think the kid would suck under any circumstance, that in my opinion is much more unbelievable.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
No, what you actually said was that if he was on a team like UGA he'd be a "first rounder this year." Others contested that belief as absurd, and you've responded with no cogent or convincing argument to back it up.

So now I'll go back to my prior question you dodged: Can you name me a first rounder who struggled as badly in college as Patrick has thus far? You seemed to be suggesting that there have been other first rounders like him, well ...can you give examples?


No you again cannot comprehend my statement.

Geez man, try harder.

Had he been on UGA, my opinion is he wouldnt have struggled as much as he does here.

Can this not get through your head?

You think he would suck under any circumstance, I disagree.

If you want to discuss this then try to stay on topic.

Do not veer from my analogy that his faults would be masked much better and that if they love him now they would really love him at a UGA...


Why is this so hard?
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
This what you guys are not grasping.

I am agreeing with you on his negatives, his faults.

My only point is they are magnified by the different schemes each year, poor oline and drops.

With 4 years in same system, his liabilities would not have been so pronounced and these experts who love him so much today would really love him.
@UK till Death
@bigblueinsanity
@Real Deal 2
@UK90


First off, i like you guys and have for years.

But my gosh you people are being hard headed.


We all agree on PT's faults. Ok?

Now, stop taking your lust for being right about how bad a player is and try to see another opinion.


My only statement is that in my opinion the guy would/could mask a bunch of his issues being on a team like UGA.

If these experts believe he is a top 3 Junior QB now, they would really love him at UGA.


ANY QB WOULD DO BETTER UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES:

Same system and coaches for 4 years. (Yes even better than 2 OC's with similar systems)

A great oline. For a QB like PT the less pressure the better.

A great running game, brings more defenders in the box and thus less covering wr's.

Better wr's to catch balls right at them and some inaccurate passes as well.


NOW ADD IN PT'S PHYSICAL CAPABILITIES WITH THESE CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE SCOUTS LOVE HIM EVEN MORE.

Would he still have a hard time with pre-reads? Maybe, not a definite he has solid coaching in ONE system for 4 years.

Would his accuracy be as bad? Maybe, I am not foolish enough to say he is an accurate passer, but I am not blind enough to see that the constant pressure has caused him to hurry passes which in turn have been poorly thrown.

Would he handle pressure better? Most likely not, his pocket presence and feel are just not their, however he would have much less pressure with a better oline, so that would be masked a bit.

Would he be a better leader? Doubt it, he just does not seem to be confident enough, or vocal enough.


Thus my simple take was if he was at a UGA all these magnified flaws we see now would be hidden much more at a UGA and these crazy scouts who love him now would swoon over him even more.

Not a reach, not a stretch, just an opinion.

If you think the kid would suck under any circumstance, that in my opinion is much more unbelievable.

You seem like a good guy. I dont take anything personal on here and understand we all just want a good program.

All those things play a part in his struggles. Physically, hes the most gifted player to ever play QB at UK. Mentally he just has so many shortcomings about how to play the position, and hes showing no signs of being closer to figuring it out.

The great majority of the time, he has a very hard time making the correct presnap read. Then he very rarely goes through his progressions (although he showed signs a few games ago, yet thats disappeared again). Usually he just panics and eats a sack, or takes off running. At least now, after 2 years, he steps up rather than rolls out. Hes also throwing the ball away at times. Thats something I guess.

When his first read is open, hes like magic. He gives us a little taste of what he should be. But sadly just becoming more and more rare.

The struggling OL effects this to a regard, because he doesnt have extended time. Although, when he does, he still looks lost and usually eats the ball.

The OC struggles playcalling, mainly because the staff doesnt trust their QB AND the QB no longer poses a threat to opposing defenses. So that helps shut down the run game.

If Barker doesnt take the job next year, we need to just run a read option. Towles running ability is underutilized this year. Thats something he could use to at least stress the defense. Right now D coordinators arent concerned about our QB hurting them at all.
 

Real Deal 2

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
10,773
11,887
113
I think we all agree that PT is gifted in things you look for, this is not easy for any of us at all. In a perfect world, PT would take the mantle and run with it, Give Drew some snaps next year and let him have 2 years to play or maybe one of the committed guys take the job in 2 years. That is what we are all hoping for. Bottom line is PT is playing behind a bad OL, not a great WR corps., Dawson is his 3rd OC in 4 years. I get it. The bottom line is the kid is a shell of himself, he has lost confidence, he is gun shy, he is not going through his reads, UT game looked like they knew what was coming. They were disguising late and he could not pick up. Very disturbing from 4th year guy.
He has not gotten better, he has reverted.

I heard him say he was not pulling trigger quick enough, that is very alarming, in college compared to pro's, everyone is open, in the pro's you have to throw them open. You have small window. IF PT is having trouble pulling trigger or indecisive in throwing to guys that he feels are covered, well good luck in NFL. All of this goes back to many factors that brain poe has brought up. I get it and buy it, bad OL, Dawson, drops, no running game.

This is about a shake up. This is about maybe extending his tenure. I think the Vandy game is make or break for Mark, he has to win this game and get bowl eligible. Next year does not set up well. Our best players are in this class and the incoming class coming in. Not a good recipe, he has to show he is moving this program forward.

All teams must be accountable. The team has left the station on Patrick, they are not going to play for him, sorry but I have heard and I can watch the game. PT could not hold Dobbs from UT's playbook. They looked in person like night and day different. He does not make players better, doesn't inspire others and quite frankly the guys don't trust him and are tired of watching the mistakes without any ramifications. Time to shake up, this is do or die for him. I mean this is getting to a runaway train.
IMO
 

Cats78

Senior
Dec 28, 2005
8,695
998
0
Towles=hartline. Towles is not the answer. You gotta see what barker can do. He can't be any worse than what we have witnessed the last few weeks with towles running the show.

Hartline? He was better than Towles. Hartline actually had a decent winning % I believe as a starter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmaso44

dnabbott25

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2003
9,332
1,550
0
His accuracy is bad. He throws balls behind, high, low, etc. And even on TIMING ROUTES yesterday, he threw the ball WAAAAAAAAAY too soon. On the one interception it was a timing route, he threw the ball BEFORE the receiver was even close to the spot or turned around, and it was picked off. Not to mention the ball was also thrown 3 yards to the left. Say whatever you want to defend him but HERE IS THE TRUTH. Pat is Pats problem. Defensive Coordinators are using speed rushers against him because they know he has ZERO pocket presence. The book on Pat is this, he gets scared, and instead of stepping up in the pocket and reading, he panicks and looks away from his receivers and runs. So basically, until Pat stays in the pocket and completes passes, defenses will CONTIUNE to speed rush him, and drop 7 into coverage. And guess what???? Our O-Line cant block speed rushers, they just cant, and the get caught holding while trying to. And this is the circle of life for us but it all starts with Patricks decisions. He can actually HELP his O-Line and receivers but he doesn't because he is simply overrated. He has had his chance. We have tons of talent, and even better recruits on their way. We cant let the whole program go down because of Patrick. Im sorry, but this experiment is over. Let Reece or Drew play the last 3 games, use Patrick sparingly.
 

oldsports_

Heisman
Dec 18, 2010
22,806
38,914
113
Stoops has put himself in a very bad position concerning the QB situation. 3 games left, 2 we must win. No win is a guaranteed, no matter what you think at this point. Stoops has waited way too long to play Barker, not start him, but just playing the kid. Way too much is on the line, and changing now, Stoops is all in with Towles. No way in hell does Barker get the start against one of the SEC's best defensive teams. Too bad we don't have Charlotte next, but we don't.
If Barker starts, and does horrible, this forum would blow up with all the "told ya so's". If Towles starts, and is his usual self of late, expect 500 more Towles threads. What gives?
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Good lord, it's not about statement "comprehension" when the words of the statement were crystal clear. Here were your actual words:



What is there to mis-comprehend in that statement? That is the only statement I disputed, and last night you appeared to be standing by it. But today you now seem to be pretending you didn't actually say that and the rest of us are all just unable to comprehend you.

Look, if you'd like to retract the prior statement with something along the lines of "oops, I didn't really mean first rounder, I just meant he wouldn't be struggling as badly...", that is fine by me, and I'd acknowledge the latter position is a far more reasonable one. But do not pretend like you did not say words that you clearly did say.



We are still way off base here.

I did say at UGA he could/would be a first rounder due to the fact his "struggles" would be lessened due to my points main multiple times.

You said show me a QB with his struggles going 1st round, these guys were all great in college...? After I said his "struggles" would be masked much more at UGA making him appear much better and thus more appealing to these "experts" who love him now.

I never said he wouldn't still have those struggles. Players deficiencies are hidden every year due to system and the players around them.


If your take is he would struggle just as much with a better oline, better running game, better wr's, and less pass defenders, then we just disagree.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
His accuracy is bad. He throws balls behind, high, low, etc. And even on TIMING ROUTES yesterday, he threw the ball WAAAAAAAAAY too soon. On the one interception it was a timing route, he threw the ball BEFORE the receiver was even close to the spot or turned around, and it was picked off. Not to mention the ball was also thrown 3 yards to the left. Say whatever you want to defend him but HERE IS THE TRUTH. Pat is Pats problem. Defensive Coordinators are using speed rushers against him because they know he has ZERO pocket presence. The book on Pat is this, he gets scared, and instead of stepping up in the pocket and reading, he panicks and looks away from his receivers and runs. So basically, until Pat stays in the pocket and completes passes, defenses will CONTIUNE to speed rush him, and drop 7 into coverage. And guess what???? Our O-Line cant block speed rushers, they just cant, and the get caught holding while trying to. And this is the circle of life for us but it all starts with Patricks decisions. He can actually HELP his O-Line and receivers but he doesn't because he is simply overrated. He has had his chance. We have tons of talent, and even better recruits on their way. We cant let the whole program go down because of Patrick. Im sorry, but this experiment is over. Let Reece or Drew play the last 3 games, use Patrick sparingly.



There is no one defending him, just a lack of reading comprehension here Ty.

This entire discussion was a what if scenario.

What if he had chosen a UGA with the same system for 4 years, a better line, better run game, better wr's, less pass defenders.

Would these factors make him look better?

Would these factors mask his real deficiencies much more at UGA than UK?

Would the experts who think he is number 3 JR QB right now really push him up even higher?

My answers to each of these is yes.

With more time and confidence he most likely would be more accurate, most kids would.

With less defenders lower his INTs, yes since many come from other areas to pick off the passes with 8 men in coverage.

Would he be better in the pocket - not sure.

Would he have a better feel - probably not.

Would he do better under pressure - probably not.

Would these factors occur much less frequently at a UGA than UK right now, definitely.

Thus those experts would see less of his deficiencies and like him even more.

Thats it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dnabbott25

RACdad

All-American
Mar 8, 2005
8,985
8,555
113
Towles cant throw over the middle. 99% percent of the time his throw is high or behind the receiver. I would love for himto be the guy but at this point I don't think he is any good. Barker must get a shot
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Towles cant throw over the middle. 99% percent of the time his throw is high or behind the receiver. I would love for himto be the guy but at this point I don't think he is any good. Barker must get a shot

Over the middle and slants both are major issues, timing and touch just not there
 

CatDaddy4daWin

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2013
6,147
1,580
0
I've been a huge supporter of Towles because I liked the kid, he loves Kentucky and think we all wanted him to succeed. But at some point you gotta try the next guy, just like Stoops has done with the corners. You just can't defend continuing to start him when you look at what he is currently giving us. 1TD to 8 INTs against FBS schools tells you everything you need to know about how he has struggled this year.

It is time to give Barker a shot and see if he can win us two more games. We have got to win 2 more games or it is going to be a really, really ugly offseason. I mean U-G-L-Y Maybe not fair, but fans expectations are raised and based on their first 5 games, should be. There's no excuse for how we've played recently. We have a couple injuries but not an abnormal amount that would explain our play.

Hope Barker comes in and wins out and puts the QB controversy to rest. Because if not Barker, who? Towles will still have a chance in the spring and fall to get back his job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

bratboy

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2014
1,552
2,319
0
WE all could continue this discussion from now on. PT is a KY boy that we would love to see tear it up here at UK and then be able to watch on Sundays in the NFL. He just isn't getting it done. Lets give Barker an opportunity to see what he can bring, may be better or may be worse but he deserves his chance!
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
Interesting discussion. It does give me pause though. Before the season started, Dawson said he could fix every QB problem except accuracy. To paraphrase him, if you arent an accurate passer there is nothing he can do to change it. We all know, and Dawson had to as well, PT isn't an accurate passer. Yet he plays even when he is really playing poorly. That makes me really wonder about DB's shortcomings. There must be some glaring ones. He deserves a real game opportunity, but I don't think I'm going to be expecting much. Time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

catfanlou

Senior
Jul 6, 2005
3,453
929
41
We really don't have anything to lose by switching to Barker the last three games. Then he and Patrick can battle it out in the spring.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
We really don't have anything to lose by switching to Barker the last three games. Then he and Patrick can battle it out in the spring.
That isn't completely true. For all we know PT is our best chance to win and we can easily get to a bowl game if we beat Vandy. Acting like the season is already over so, who cares, put in DB may be a terrible mistake. We just don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

dnabbott25

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2003
9,332
1,550
0
There is no one defending him, just a lack of reading comprehension here Ty.

This entire discussion was a what if scenario.

What if he had chosen a UGA with the same system for 4 years, a better line, better run game, better wr's, less pass defenders.

Would these factors make him look better?

Would these factors mask his real deficiencies much more at UGA than UK?

Would the experts who think he is number 3 JR QB right now really push him up even higher?

My answers to each of these is yes.

With more time and confidence he most likely would be more accurate, most kids would.

With less defenders lower his INTs, yes since many come from other areas to pick off the passes with 8 men in coverage.

Would he be better in the pocket - not sure.

Would he have a better feel - probably not.

Would he do better under pressure - probably not.

Would these factors occur much less frequently at a UGA than UK right now, definitely.

Thus those experts would see less of his deficiencies and like him even more.

Thats it.


Well said, and I agree. BUT, Pat is at UK, and that's what he is being evaluated on. The current situation. And I still say, even if he was at UGA or anywhere else, he would still have to make better decisions, and pocket presence. I just hope he turns it around. He needs to have balls of steel, and man up, and step up when the rush comes, NOT step out. And the damn receivers need to help him, and catch some balls. GET BLAKE BONE SOME THROWS !!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

dnabbott25

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2003
9,332
1,550
0
We've all been hard on Pat, the line, and the receivers. Guess what, that's our job, at least that's our job on this board. We are the same guys who will praise them when they turn it around, and make no mistake, I AM ROOTING FOR PAT AND THE LINE AND THE RECEIVERS. Go cats, go big blue. (give us 3 wins and a bowl, and all of this goes away) in the end, that's all we'll remember.
 

KendallCat

Heisman
Sep 14, 2002
40,938
11,693
93
@UK till Death
@bigblueinsanity
@Real Deal 2
@UK90


First off, i like you guys and have for years.

But my gosh you people are being hard headed.


We all agree on PT's faults. Ok?

Now, stop bathing yourselves in your lust for being right about how bad a player is and try to see another opinion.


My only statement is that in my opinion the guy could/would mask a bunch of his issues being on a team like UGA.

If these experts believe he is a top 3 Junior QB now, they would really love him at UGA.


ANY QB WOULD DO BETTER UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES:

Same system and coaches for 4 years. (Yes even better than 2 OC's with similar systems)

A great oline. For a QB like PT the less pressure the better.

A great running game, brings more defenders in the box and thus less covering wr's.

Better wr's to catch balls right at them and some inaccurate passes as well.


NOW ADD IN PT'S PHYSICAL CAPABILITIES WITH THESE CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE SCOUTS LOVE HIM EVEN MORE.

Would he still have a hard time with pre-reads? Maybe, not a definite if he had solid coaching in ONE system for 4 years.

Would his accuracy be as bad? Maybe, I am not foolish enough to say he is an accurate passer, but I am not blind enough to see that the constant pressure has caused him to hurry passes which in turn have been poorly thrown.

Would he handle pressure better? Most likely not, his pocket presence and feel are just not there, however he would have much less pressure with a better oline, so that would be masked a bit.

Would he be a better leader? Doubt it, he just does not seem to be confident enough, or vocal enough. But a UGA would have several capable leaders.


Thus my simple take was if he was at a UGA all these magnified flaws we see now would be hidden much more at a UGA and these crazy scouts who love him now would swoon over him even more.

Not a reach, not a stretch, just an opinion.

If you think the kid would suck under any circumstance, that in my opinion is much more unbelievable.

First off most of the people on this hope you work in a missile silo or some job that does not require you to work much during the day because your employer is not getting their money's worth from you. It is pretty much a given that if someone says something derogatory about PT you come flying in to save him every chance. Hope you are related to him, and if not maybe a bromance or good friend.

I think Real Deal made some great points which I agree with and would have typed earlier, but in doing so it would mean a nonstop back and forth with you posting every 3rd post defending Towles. Go back and look through this thread and count how many times you post on here defending him. If not a relative you need to be one.

Bottom line is prototypical size and arm does not mean squat if you don't have mechanics, footwork, and pocket presence. Who cares if you have a big arm but no footwork - that is like shooting a cannon out of a canoe. QB's job is to get the ball out on time and in rhythm. If he is getting a strong pass rush he needs to sit down with his coordinator and discuss how he is going to scheme against it - short quick passes, 3 step drops, max protect, formations and motion to determine if it is man or zone, do they have enough blockers for pass rushers, do they use "0" protection, do they frustrated the defense by having them rush 7-8 plays in a row with no chance to get the QB because the ball is out by their 3rd step - pretty frustrating and wears a dline out. His size can help but Aaron Rodgers is not large nor Drew Brees, but they are accurate with the ball. Take that any day over a Jamarcus Russell or Jeff George.

Top trait of a QB is his ability to lead, motivate, inspire confidence in his fellow offense players. PT does none of this with his actions or body language, and as a player it is the worst thing to have to play with. The QB steers the team, decides who gets the ball, and leads everyone. He has failed his teammates in this respect - that is why there is a problem with the team.