Epstein - Maxwell to Testify August 11th - Bill Clinton Subpoenaed - John Kerry Implicated

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
So let’s get this straight Tinkerbell.

Trump has been under fire since he came down the escalator in 2015, but your party had proof he slept with underage girls for 10 years and didn’t use it against him.

That dog don’t hunt.
Dude, Pam the bad witch said the list was on her desk, until it wasn't. And now, no one is more furious about it than Magas who are raging about a suspected cover-up, so don't try to make this about Biden.



 

Allornothing

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
9,451
6,092
113
Dude, Pam the bad witch said the list was on her desk, until it wasn't. And now, no one is more furious about it than Magas who are raging about a suspected cover-up, so don't try to make this about Biden.

Are you on crack? At what point in my post did I mention Biden? My point was simply that you libtards expect us to believe that the list is now not being released because Trump's name is on it. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. That the previous DOJ had that information before the current one, and they didn't release it. After all the crap they've thrown at Trump (Russia Gate, Impeachments, trying to kill him, to name a few) you think they had Trump's name on this list and didn't release it?
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,534
14,634
113
Dude, Pam the bad witch said the list was on her desk, until it wasn't. And now, no one is more furious about it than Magas who are raging about a suspected cover-up, so don't try to make this about Biden.




At this point it’s not about either party. They both had ample time to put up or shut up. Appears they both shut up.

now we the people must demand answers. Both parties deserve answers.

Pam Bondi needs to be fired yesterday.

And the last question no one is answering is who did Ghislaine traffic those girls to?

1751903376208.png
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,653
15,898
113
dum dum, who's on the list then? Why didn't they release it?
 

tigres88

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2022
659
2,774
93
Here's the deal- MAGA and the conspiracy theorists driving the cult are the one's who have been chasing the "Epstein List" for years. MAGA leadership has known this, and its a really easy carrot to dangle to drive membership to said cult. Whether there was ever a list or not, this has been a galvanizing tool to keep the cult together/drive them deeper into it.

I still don't think there has ever been a real list for that reason (and am on record with that). But this whole charade, with many of those who used the list to galvanize MAGA together, of there now not being a list at all, is suspect af.

Just an absolutely incompetent administration from top to bottom.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,534
14,634
113
dum dum, who's on the list then? Why didn't they release it?
Well we know Bill Clinton is on the list. Most likely Bill Gates. And probably a host of others which may, or may not, include Donald Trump.

We all deserve to know whether our politicians are compromised.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016

hopefultiger13

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2008
10,456
16,500
113
Again, I don't see what the big deal is... This list has (supposedly) been around for years and both parties have had the chance to release it. Neither have. I seem to recall folks on both sides have said they've seen it. But now it doesn't exist. That would bother most people, but we are talking about Dems and Republicans. They don't give a **** one way or the other. Is anyone REALLY surprised?

As for the Bondi part, saying that she had the list on her desk and then that the list doesn't exist would SEEM to indicate lying as both those things can't be true. Again, what's the big deal? I mean it's not the 1st time the Trump administration has just absolutely lied about stuff. Remember when our new Secretary of Defense said that he wasn't using a chat group and that the reporter was lying. Then the reporter released the transcript. Then they started talking about how this information wasn't classified and that the info didn't endanger anyone.

It's OK to lie. Why should someone be fired for doing that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
It's frustrating when a thread gets derailed by people who can't follow the bouncing ball, but just for the sake of clarity:

The Biden admin didn't even talk about the list, which means they "could" have been covering it up for their own reasons OR there never was a list at all.

My post didn't make the claim that there was a list, ONLY that it was suspicious because Pam the bad witch said there was a list but strangely they now claim there is no list, no nothing, right after Elon claimed Trump was on it.

This isn't about what I think or what Biden did or didn't do, it's about what's being said NOW. Get it?

You post way too much for someone who never understands wth is going on outside of what you learned from the tweets from Russian bots that Growls floods the board with. So my advice to you is to read more and post less.
 

Allornothing

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
9,451
6,092
113
Look I D 10 T, this is what you said:

Dude, Pam the bad witch said the list was on her desk, until it wasn't. And now, no one is more furious about it than Magas who are raging about a suspected cover-up, so don't try to make this about Biden.

I just pointed out to your dumb *** that I never said anything about BIDEN in my post.
 

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
Look I D 10 T, this is what you said:

Dude, Pam the bad witch said the list was on her desk, until it wasn't. And now, no one is more furious about it than Magas who are raging about a suspected cover-up, so don't try to make this about Biden.

I just pointed out to your dumb *** that I never said anything about BIDEN in my post.
but your party had proof he slept with underage girls for 10 years and didn’t use it against him.

That dog don’t hunt.
Who in my party would have known there was a list outside of the Biden administration? My post that you originally responded to also didn't claim there was a list, only that the new statement from the DOJ was suspicious, which means your response didn't apply - you just had a dumb, irrelevant talking point you had to share because it's the one you remember most from Insurrection Barbie.
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,534
14,634
113
It seems as if a full minute is missing from the tapes released. Grok confirmed that it was indeed missing.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,534
14,634
113
Again, I don't see what the big deal is... This list has (supposedly) been around for years and both parties have had the chance to release it. Neither have. I seem to recall folks on both sides have said they've seen it. But now it doesn't exist. That would bother most people, but we are talking about Dems and Republicans. They don't give a **** one way or the other. Is anyone REALLY surprised?

As for the Bondi part, saying that she had the list on her desk and then that the list doesn't exist would SEEM to indicate lying as both those things can't be true. Again, what's the big deal? I mean it's not the 1st time the Trump administration has just absolutely lied about stuff. Remember when our new Secretary of Defense said that he wasn't using a chat group and that the reporter was lying. Then the reporter released the transcript. Then they started talking about how this information wasn't classified and that the info didn't endanger anyone.

It's OK to lie. Why should someone be fired for doing that?
 

tboonpickens

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2001
16,236
25,569
113
Again, I don't see what the big deal is... This list has (supposedly) been around for years and both parties have had the chance to release it. Neither have. I seem to recall folks on both sides have said they've seen it. But now it doesn't exist. That would bother most people, but we are talking about Dems and Republicans. They don't give a **** one way or the other. Is anyone REALLY surprised?

As for the Bondi part, saying that she had the list on her desk and then that the list doesn't exist would SEEM to indicate lying as both those things can't be true. Again, what's the big deal? I mean it's not the 1st time the Trump administration has just absolutely lied about stuff. Remember when our new Secretary of Defense said that he wasn't using a chat group and that the reporter was lying. Then the reporter released the transcript. Then they started talking about how this information wasn't classified and that the info didn't endanger anyone.

It's OK to lie. Why should someone be fired for doing that?
the big deal is that the MAGA cult has made Epstein a central figure in their mythos and alleged fight against the DeEp StATe. democrats don't give a **** about Epstein other than the rather obvious connection between Epstein, Maxwell, and the MAGA savior who has made enough unsavory comments on tape to make it plainly obvious why he'd be hanging with Epstein.

for MAGA it's just another in a long line of ******** missives that define their anti-truth, anti-logic, anti-science, anti-data agenda.
 

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
the big deal is that the MAGA cult has made Epstein a central figure in their mythos and alleged fight against the DeEp StATe. democrats don't give a **** about Epstein other than the rather obvious connection between Epstein, Maxwell, and the MAGA savior who has made enough unsavory comments on tape to make it plainly obvious why he'd be hanging with Epstein.

for MAGA it's just another in a long line of ******** missives that define their anti-truth, anti-logic, anti-science, anti-data agenda.
Well said!
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,534
14,634
113
the big deal is that the MAGA cult has made Epstein a central figure in their mythos and alleged fight against the DeEp StATe. democrats don't give a **** about Epstein other than the rather obvious connection between Epstein, Maxwell, and the MAGA savior who has made enough unsavory comments on tape to make it plainly obvious why he'd be hanging with Epstein.

for MAGA it's just another in a long line of ******** missives that define their anti-truth, anti-logic, anti-science, anti-data agenda.
Who did Ghislaine traffic those women to? Bill Clinton and who else?
 

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
36,271
26,859
113
This story is not over. Mark it down. Israeli Mossad is part of the story imo. Maxwells father was a high up spook in Mossad. I am not assuming the DOJ is closing the book on the Epstein saga. The timing is probably not at the right point to show the goods. There is still rampant corruption in the DOJ though...agree with that. We just had Comeys daughter conveniently be the prosecutor for the Diddy trial where he gets found innocent of the more damaging charges. I will continue to believe in Trump and wait to see what happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

DW4_2016

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2010
8,421
8,591
113
I don't know the answer to either question headgiver. However, you act like you do.


seems like you think there's a chance your hero is on the list
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dungeon09

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
This story is not over. Mark it down. Israeli Mossad is part of the story imo. Maxwells father was a high up spook in Mossad. I am not assuming the DOJ is closing the book on the Epstein saga. The timing is probably not at the right point to show the goods. There is still rampant corruption in the DOJ though...agree with that. We just had Comeys daughter conveniently be the prosecutor for the Diddy trial where he gets found innocent of the more damaging charges. I will continue to believe in Trump and wait to see what happens.
🤣 Dude, WTF are you smoking? She LOST on the two most serious charges - RICO and sex trafficking. Next conspiracy?
 

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
You are honestly insane. Here is the results. How about shut your pie hole and just learn from my posts. Assuming you are referring to Diddy here.


If she is the prosecutor, it's bad that she lost Count 1 and Count 2....how the hell do you frame that as "conveniently be the prosecutor for the Diddy trial where he gets found innocent of the more damaging charges."

That means she wasn't successful..... Get it?
 

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,653
15,898
113
I don't know the answer to either question headgiver. However, you act like you do.
But you use conjecture and assumptions for your total outlook in life. Why not go ahead further and just assume this current administration, which had deep connections with epstein. Was on the list?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
36,271
26,859
113
If she is the prosecutor, it's bad that she lost Count 1 and Count 2....how the hell do you frame that as "conveniently be the prosecutor for the Diddy trial where he gets found innocent of the more damaging charges."

That means she wasn't successful..... Get it?
She lost on the most serious charges that carried longer sentence potential.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
36,271
26,859
113
Looks like its confirmed they closed the investigation short of new info??? I still think we have not heard the last of it. Would be extremely disappointed if that turns out to be the case.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016

dpic73

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2005
22,221
17,115
113
She lost on the most serious charges that carried longer sentence potential.
Correct, so why are you bringing her into this conversation at all unless you're trying to say she intentionally lost on those two counts?

Why would she do that? You know she's not the jury, right?