Epstein - Maxwell to Testify August 11th - Bill Clinton Subpoenaed - John Kerry Implicated

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
35,541
852
113
Truth.



I don’t know what’s going on with the Epstein Files but this is what I do know.

In 6 months..

Thousands of sex traffickers are in prison because of Trump.

Thousands of sex traffickers have been deported because of Trump.

Thousands of children have been SAVED because of Trump.

And by the end of his term it will be in the millions. Please stop pretending he’s protecting these monsters.
 

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
Truth.



I don’t know what’s going on with the Epstein Files but this is what I do know.

In 6 months..

Thousands of sex traffickers are in prison because of Trump.

Thousands of sex traffickers have been deported because of Trump.

Thousands of children have been SAVED because of Trump.

And by the end of his term it will be in the millions. Please stop pretending he’s protecting these monsters.

 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,296
906
113
First day his approval went down in over two weeks. No doubt due the way he handled the Epstein question yesterday.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
35,541
852
113
Just a reminder and reality check since you libs are all of a sudden concerned about the subject.



And here it is:

The Biden-Harris Sex Trafficking Administration:

Border Czar Tom Homan: They allowed a DEAD PERSON to take 1,600 children.

WHISTLEBLOWERS:
• In one case, 11 young girls were released to a single male.

• In another case, 1 dead man sponsored over 1,600 children.

Homan warned that if they opened up the CBP1 App, it would create a massive human trafficking network… and that’s exactly what it did.

—— “how many sick pedophiles would be willing to sponsor anybody to come live in the United States? And after they get here, they own them.”

Death penalty!!
 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,296
906
113
Public pressure works. Doesn't hurt that Trumps approval rating took a big hit after his Epstein comments a couple days ago. People don't like a two tiered justice system. The elites need to face accountability.

 

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
Public pressure works. Doesn't hurt that Trumps approval rating took a big hit after his Epstein comments a couple days ago. People don't like a two tiered justice system. The elites need to face accountability.


The polls haven't had a chance to catch up to the Epstein comments yet but they did drop after the BBB passed - expect them to drop even further soon.

"Gallup polling shows that Trump's approval ratings at the six-month mark in both of his terms are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations, at 38% and 40% for each term respectively. The average since John F. Kennedy in 1961 is 52%, according to the polling firm."

 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
Ya … quoting Swalwell probably ain’t the best. At the very least he should’ve been expelled from Congress.
That's a purely partisan take

 

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,296
906
113
The polls haven't had a chance to catch up to the Epstein comments yet but they did drop after the BBB passed - expect them to drop even further soon.

"Gallup polling shows that Trump's approval ratings at the six-month mark in both of his terms are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations, at 38% and 40% for each term respectively. The average since John F. Kennedy in 1961 is 52%, according to the polling firm."

Polls or no polls, the OBBB is the law of the land.

It's my opinion his numbers declined on the Epstein comments. People do not like a two tiered justice system.
 

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
Polls or no polls, the OBBB is the law of the land.

It's my opinion his numbers declined on the Epstein comments. People do not like a two tiered justice system.
There have only been a few high quality polls come out since the 4th but ok.
 

ANEW

Member
Jul 7, 2023
1,219
86
48
There is lot more going on than the epstein files, and while disappointing if more info is not released, I don't think "the epstein files" was a singular reason for anyone's vote for trump. It wasn't for me, anyway.
 

PAWrocka

Member
Nov 3, 2008
20,683
45
38
That's a purely partisan take

:/

we are just going to have to agree that your purely wrong.

we can agree that the system/institution of Congress allows their members to operate under different rules regardless of party affiliation. That we could agree on ….

if a member of the military, with similar clearances had been honeypotted like Eric did…. He would’ve been dishonorably discharged at least … would’ve most likely served time in Leavenworth

it’s INCREDIBLY partisan to even think “he did nothing wrong”
 

ANEW

Member
Jul 7, 2023
1,219
86
48
if a member of the military, with similar clearances had been honeypotted like Eric did…. He would’ve been dishonorably discharged at least … would’ve most likely served time in Leavenworth

it’s INCREDIBLY partisan to even think “he did nothing wrong”
I would disagree. Do we know if swalwell disclosed his relationship with a foreign national? Did he know she was not a us citizen? Military with a Top Secret level clearance are supposed to report planned foreign travel (beyond just submiting for vacation time) and relationships with known foreign nationals up the security management chain. The info is annotated and If anything is problematic then you get told what the problem is and what you need to do. Not sure what rules congress critters have.

Swallwell is a dirtbag, but I don't think that there was any evidence that he was passing along intel to his chinese spy activity partner. I also didn't hear that he broke any reporting rules. From what i know the FBI dug into fang fang and then had a sitdown with swalwell and he broke things off.

I remeber getting raked over the coals on a clearance re-investigation because my family and I were renting a house from some Iranians who had been living in the US for a long time and whose family used to be irainian air force under the Shah and then afterwards for a while. They bailed out when the regime said they could go as a reward for helping the regime during the war with iraq. They had to abandon their family property but the emigrated to the US. Or that's the story i was told. I told the investigator "**** dude, I didn't check their passports and i don't socialize with them outside of an annual cristmas party. I just rent the house from them so how the hell would i know that one or more of them had dual citizenship. I don't talk work **** with them, for god's sake. I don't even talk to my wife about classified stuff." He was like, well yeah ,ok. You're good.
 
Last edited:
Aug 20, 2008
10,434
83
48
Truth.



I don’t know what’s going on with the Epstein Files but this is what I do know.

In 6 months..

Thousands of sex traffickers are in prison because of Trump.

Thousands of sex traffickers have been deported because of Trump.

Thousands of children have been SAVED because of Trump.

And by the end of his term it will be in the millions. Please stop pretending he’s protecting these monsters.

Well, it seems to me that as usual, you posted some BS tweet w/o a bit of evidence. As of 7/21/2025, Trump will have been in office for 6 months. Official Law enforcement numbers generally don't come out for the current year until well into the next year. You have any numbers to back up this tweet? Of course we have to balance that with the fact that this is a tweet by AG... who is that again? Do you know? Pro Tip, I bet you don't.

BUT we CAN go back to his 1st term... Here's some comparisons from Tracereports.org. They claim to be nonpartisan and are frequently cited by news organizations, government agencies, law firms, and researchers, suggesting a general perception of reliability and objectivity.


For what it's worth, I can't find anything newer than 2020 so I can't compare Biden's numbers. Maybe he forgot to send them.

But maybe instead of labeling it "Truth", maybe try something a little closer to the actual truth "Random Tweet by random person saying stuff that I wish was true so I'm treating it as fact". That would be a bit more accurate.
 
Last edited:

PAWrocka

Member
Nov 3, 2008
20,683
45
38
I would disagree. Do we know if swalwell disclosed his relationship with a foreign national? Did he know she was not a us citizen? Military with a Top Secret level clearance are supposed to report planned foreign travel (beyond just submiting for vacation time) and relationships with known foreign nationals up the security management chain. The info is annotated and If anything is problematic then you get told what the problem is and what you need to do. Not sure what rules congress critters have.

Swallwell is a dirtbag, but I don't think that there was any evidence that he was passing along intel to his chinese spy activity partner. I also didn't hear that he broke any reporting rules. From what i know the FBI dug into fang fang and then had a sitdown with swalwell and he broke things off.

I remeber getting raked over the coals on a clearance re-investigation because my family and I were renting a house from some Iranians who had been living in the US for a long time and whose family used to be irainian air force under the Shah and then afterwards for a while before they bailed out when the regime said they could go and emigrated to the US. I told the investigator "**** dude, I didn't check their passports and i don't socialize with them outside of an annual cristmas party. I just rent the house from them so how the hell would i know that one or more of them had dual citizenship. I don't talk work **** with them, for god's sake. I don't even talk to my wife about classified stuff." He was like, well yeah ,ok. You're good.
I disagree with your … disagreement haha, but appreciate the feedback.

There is an ocean of difference between what Swalwell “did” and the personal scenario you laid out.
 

dpic73

Active member
Jul 27, 2005
21,752
460
83
:/

we are just going to have to agree that your purely wrong.

we can agree that the system/institution of Congress allows their members to operate under different rules regardless of party affiliation. That we could agree on ….

if a member of the military, with similar clearances had been honeypotted like Eric did…. He would’ve been dishonorably discharged at least … would’ve most likely served time in Leavenworth

it’s INCREDIBLY partisan to even think “he did nothing wrong”
You're right, we will agree to disagree because there's no way you can know I'm purely wrong since they found no wrongdoing, no illegal campaign contributions, no evidence that he passed along classified information and he immediately cut off contact when he was informed about her. And lol at the system because there is no other Democrat sans Schiff that they would like to expel more than him, so if there was something to nail him for, they would have found it.

So with only that to go on, there's no way for you to know more than me but insisting that you do makes your conclusion INCREDIBLY partisan.
 

ANEW

Member
Jul 7, 2023
1,219
86
48
I disagree with your … disagreement haha, but appreciate the feedback.

There is an ocean of difference between what Swalwell “did” and the personal scenario you laid out.
Sure there is a difference, but it's an example how association does not mean "guilt" . Serious question: What rules/policies/laws did swalwell break? When Swalwell was sat down by the FBI, he broke it off with Fang Fang, which is what he should have done. There is no evidence that he gave any secrets to Fang Fang or that he knew that she was a spy before the FBI told him.

Edit: I'm sure he was targeted because he is the idot that he is but that doesn't mean that he actually gave up any info that he wasn't supposed to. Maybe he did, but no info that he did.
 

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
35,541
852
113
Well, it seems to me that as usual, you posted some BS tweet w/o a bit of evidence. As of 7/21/2025, Trump will have been in office for 6 months. Official Law enforcement numbers generally don't come out for the current year until well into the next year. You have any numbers to back up this tweet? Of course we have to balance that with the fact that this is a tweet by AG... who is that again? Do you know? Pro Tip, I bet you don't.

BUT we CAN go back to his 1st term... Here's some comparisons from Tracereports.org. They claim to be nonpartisan and are frequently cited by news organizations, government agencies, law firms, and researchers, suggesting a general perception of reliability and objectivity.


For what it's worth, I can't find anything newer than 2020 so I can't compare Biden's numbers. Maybe he forgot to send them.

But maybe instead of labeling it "Truth", maybe try something a little closer to the actual truth "Random Tweet by random person saying stuff that I wish was true so I'm treating it as fact". That would be a bit more accurate.
This mumbo jumbo you just posted doesn't prove ****. Follow Dan Bongino and Kash Patel on X as they post about all the sting operation arrests after they occur. They are doing what I said so suck it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hopefultiger13

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
35,541
852
113
It's not over til its over.



It’s starting to look like the internet and influencer crowd overreacted and jumped to conclusions, based on a leaked unofficial memo draft, from known Deep State asset, Axios.

Then this emotion-laced hysteria was amplified by bad actors and useful stooges. The public were whipped into a frenzy, influencers were turning on Trump, Bondi, Kash, Bongino, etc., all over an unofficial leak, from a nefarious source.

Now we have official statements via the FOIA federal court filings from Judicial Watch, that the DOJ/FBI confirmed the Epstein situation is NOT resolved, and search efforts for information are STILL ONGOING.

Meaning that 99% of the internet overreacted, the sky is not falling, Trump and his appointees are not compromised, and that the investigations are still underway.

Much of the information about Epstein, and other Deep State criminality, is not where it’s supposed to be. Trump loyalists are still looking for it. The swamp built in failsafes to protect themselves.

The show goes on.
 

TigerGrowls

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2001
35,541
852
113


Holy **** 👀

Judicial Watch filed FOIA request about the Epstein files, and FBI/DOJ confirm that they are STILL reviewing information and that “search efforts are ongoing”.

Sounds to me like the FBI/DOJ just admitted some of the files are still missing/destroyed, as many have suggested, including myself.

Reminder, that despite all the hysteria over the last few days, absolutely nothing has been officially stated by the Trump admin. The leaked memo from Axios was a very informal draft, not finalized, no header, no date, no signature, and there has been no official statement from the FBI/DOJ on the Epstein matter. No authority ever officially said the Epstein case was closed. It was just an Axios article, with an alleged leaked draft of a memo, followed by an Internet frenzy. Nothing was official.

But the FBI/DOJ just officially admitted in court, that their search efforts for Epstein information are STILL ONGOING, meaning that this is not over, and that the Deep State have likely either hidden or destroyed the most incriminating information about the Epstein operation, and presumably other topics as well.

Meaning the reason Bondi, Kash, Bongino, etc., cannot be forthcoming at the moment, is because it’s still an active investigation. Kash on Rogan basically spoon-fed it to us that he doesn’t have the goods and that they are somewhere else.

And I bet you that the announcement of the Brennan/Comey investigations likely has something to do with all this, because if anyone hid information before Trump showed up in 2017, the men in charge were Brennan/Comey/Clapper.

In conclusion, nothing is official, Deep State actors are covering up information, but the search is still on, while the Trump loyalists clean house, and a shadow war is raging.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2002
19,296
906
113
And who ran the weapons to Iran Tiger?
It was Ronald Reagan and his shadow military that did it. They sold weapons to Iran so they could fund destabilizing governments in South America without Congress approval. DISGUSTING.
Surely you think the same about fast and furious in the obama admin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

firegiver

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2007
71,509
1,570
113
Surely you think the same about fast and furious in the obama admin.
I think the FBI and the Obama administration absolutely ****** that up. But it wasn't as completely corrupt and nefarious as the Iran Contra scandle. The ATF which is an organization both the left and right should want abolished, was selling guns to known gun runners to attempt to track their network. But that looks pretty stupid when in the end you are found to supply weapons to criminals. They played the good ole, we are the government and can commit crimes with you to entrap you in those crimes, card.
 
Aug 20, 2008
10,434
83
48
It's not over til its over.



It’s starting to look like the internet and influencer crowd overreacted and jumped to conclusions, based on a leaked unofficial memo draft, from known Deep State asset, Axios.

Then this emotion-laced hysteria was amplified by bad actors and useful stooges. The public were whipped into a frenzy, influencers were turning on Trump, Bondi, Kash, Bongino, etc., all over an unofficial leak, from a nefarious source.

Now we have official statements via the FOIA federal court filings from Judicial Watch, that the DOJ/FBI confirmed the Epstein situation is NOT resolved, and search efforts for information are STILL ONGOING.

Meaning that 99% of the internet overreacted, the sky is not falling, Trump and his appointees are not compromised, and that the investigations are still underway.

Much of the information about Epstein, and other Deep State criminality, is not where it’s supposed to be. Trump loyalists are still looking for it. The swamp built in failsafes to protect themselves.

The show goes on.

I don't have any idea what's going on here. BUT Bondi said the Epstein list was on her desk for review. Then she said that there wasn't a list and that Epstein didn't get murdered in jail. Which is exactly what the FBI and company determined in 2019. One of those things isn't true.

I've heard a LOT of Trump officials saying that there was a massive Epstein coverup. Now they say there wasn't. IMHO, one of those things is true and the other is not. If there was a coverup, then why are they saying that there wasn't. If there was no coverup, then why were they saying there was.

Again, I have no idea what's true and what isn't. One thing is clear though. That there's some folks in government positions that are lying about it or were lying about it.