I said Naz is better? I think the problem may be your reading comprehension. I said ESL doesn't have an on field argument, only that you have a lot of kids with offers and you "look" better than teams. But we know the "looks better" argument doesn't work, NV showed that.
Which quote should I pull up from you....
The one you applauded hf for beating nv and then said esl hasn't beat anyone?
How about propping up naz for beating batavia by 14, and continuing to say esl hasn't beat anyone, even though they beat batavia by 14.
What about classifying brother rice, Marist, and bolingbrook as good wins, while at the same time giving esl no credit for beating eville who had a better record and more playoff points than all three of those teams
Or discrediting esl sos even though it's better than two higher class teams playing for state on saturday.
Feel free to address and clarify any of those highly hypocritical points you made so I can see which arbitrary data point you will use next. Mind you, I've provided tangible objective data for you to consider, not who looks best