Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
EA Sports' updated player contract creates complications for College Football 27
On3:
The $40 million myth: No college football roster has hit the mark (yet)
NIL:
NIL Go clears $79.8 million in debut report
On3:
Best Bets: Ari Wasserman’s Week 2 College Football Locks
Nebraska:
Matt Rhule firmly pushes back on the thought of ditching FCS scheduling
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ESPN analyst take on Big 12 adds...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeleer" data-source="post: 129570975" data-attributes="member: 1484359"><p>I'm happy Rutgers found a good resting spot. I've always liked your fans as well. However, if the model goes the way it will, I think the SEC (with Missouri) and the B10 (Rutgers and Maryland) are going to have some buyers remorse. Unless Rutgers reaches a level they have only attained a couple of years in their entire history, they are not going to be driving the ratings needle if based on their performance on the field alone...which frankly is how it's supposed to be.</p><p></p><p>WVU has suffered lately as well. But we have a stronger sports brand, which will see us through this (with or without Dana). When the model changes, we will be able to get enough paying eyeballs to justify our share of the B12 money.</p><p></p><p>Harsh words aside...I will always be pulling for you guys and hope you can thrive there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeleer, post: 129570975, member: 1484359"] I'm happy Rutgers found a good resting spot. I've always liked your fans as well. However, if the model goes the way it will, I think the SEC (with Missouri) and the B10 (Rutgers and Maryland) are going to have some buyers remorse. Unless Rutgers reaches a level they have only attained a couple of years in their entire history, they are not going to be driving the ratings needle if based on their performance on the field alone...which frankly is how it's supposed to be. WVU has suffered lately as well. But we have a stronger sports brand, which will see us through this (with or without Dana). When the model changes, we will be able to get enough paying eyeballs to justify our share of the B12 money. Harsh words aside...I will always be pulling for you guys and hope you can thrive there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
ESPN analyst take on Big 12 adds...
Top
Bottom