Even more proof of the corrupt media: The Paris Accords

[WVPATX]

Has anyone seen any major media outlet question man made global warming or question the value of the Accords? I haven't. In fact, they are acting not as fair purveyors of both sides of the debate. They have taken sides and it has been apparent on every major media outlet I have watched, except Fox. Chris Wallace did a good job of going after both sides. Chuck Todd was doing his level best to convince Americans of his point of view and he had 3 libs and 1 conservative on his panel. So it was 4-1. That is fair and balanced? LOL.

They are not supposed to take sides.

 

[Keyser76]

Science doesn't have sides in the sane world.

 

[moe]

Fox still has a news channel? I thought all of the former male employees were either dead, fired or being brought up on sexual harassment charges not to mention the former female employees who fled for their professional lives or just to avoid being groped.

 

[WVPATX]

Science doesn't have sides in the sane world.

The science is not proven. The 97% figure is completely bogus. The Accord was fatally flawed. Yet nothing from the main stream media to tell Americans both sides.

 

[WVPATX]

Fox still has a news channel? I thought all of the former male employees were either dead, fired or being brought up on sexual harassment charges not to mention the former female employees who fled for their professional lives or just to avoid being groped.

At least Fox deals with its problems. A CNN host called Trump a piece of ****. Crickets from CNN. If a network did this to Obama, the host would be fired immediately. No integrity at CNN. Not a news network. Same with Bill Maher. Used the N word. Still working at HBO. Libs can says anything and the media supports them. Conservatives are crucified, destroyed and fired with the full support of the media. Double standard, big time.

 

[moe]

Conservatives are crucified, destroyed and fired with the full support of the media.

When did this happen? (not related to sexual harassment charges)

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Has anyone seen any major media outlet question man made global warming or question the value of the Accords? I haven't. In fact, they are acting not as fair purveyors of both sides of the debate. They have taken sides and it has been apparent on every major media outlet I have watched, except Fox. Chris Wallace did a good job of going after both sides. Chuck Todd was doing his level best to convince Americans of his point of view and he had 3 libs and 1 conservative on his panel. So it was 4-1. That is fair and balanced? LOL.

They are not supposed to take sides.

Forget debating the science of it. Just report the scientific affects of what it would achieve against the economic impacts. It's pretty simple. Debate the economics of it. I've seen little to know disclosure of the economic impact locally, what we'd be required to do, etc. it's been a pile on of Trump's decision. There is and was a logical decision to pull out and I haven't seen any discussion it.

 

[WVPATX]

Forget debating the science of it. Just report the scientific affects of what it would achieve against the economic impacts. It's pretty simple. Debate the economics of it. I've seen little to know disclosure of the economic impact locally, what we'd be required to do, etc. it's been a pile on of Trump's decision. There is and was a logical decision to pull out and I haven't seen any discussion it.

Agreed, no discussion of it and that was my point. No debate, only presenting one side.

To me, this Accord was an economic Accord with the transfer of huge sums of money to developing countries planned and run by an "International Body." Since it did not solve the problem, it was a great way of getting money out of developed countries and into undeveloped or developing countries.