"Every SEC team will make more in TV money than Texas and Notre Dame.."

WayboDawg

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,219
1
38
What has happened the past few years really is incredible. It makes me wonder how good will it really get for us.
 

codeDawg

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2007
2,102
0
36
What has happened the past few years really is incredible. It makes me wonder how good will it really get for us.

Wait until the big 5 get approval to make their own rules or we break off into division 4. The world of college football is going to be completely different in 10 years.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,692
314
83
Sometimes you are in the right place at the right time, big time.

The future is very bright.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
The big difference for our programs...

is that it helps level the playing field for us.

When you're sharing a small pot, then everything that the large universities can add makes that much more of a difference.

In other words, if you're sharing $100M in revenue as a league, and you're getting $10M in a 10 team league (round numbers for easy comparison), then a team that can spend $25M more than you can out of their own pockets due to their own revenue streams has a HUGE advantage over you.

If your same league is splitting $1B in revenue, and each team is getting $100M, then that extra $25M that the bigger team can spend doesn't take them that much further than you anymore.

In other words, the bigger the shared pot gets, the better it is for our lesser revenue programs.
 

The Peeper

Heisman
Feb 26, 2008
15,487
10,640
113
So I guess we'll be seeing another venom filled article from our friend in Orlando in the next day or two
 

msudawg12

Senior
Dec 9, 2008
3,889
646
113
is that it helps level the playing field for us.

When you're sharing a small pot, then everything that the large universities can add makes that much more of a difference.

In other words, if you're sharing $100M in revenue as a league, and you're getting $10M in a 10 team league (round numbers for easy comparison), then a team that can spend $25M more than you can out of their own pockets due to their own revenue streams has a HUGE advantage over you.

If your same league is splitting $1B in revenue, and each team is getting $100M, then that extra $25M that the bigger team can spend doesn't take them that much further than you anymore.

In other words, the bigger the shared pot gets, the better it is for our lesser revenue programs.

I Agree in the sense that you'll see a larger jump in the have nots big 3 sports.

what you'll see with the haves (bama, florida, etc) is dumping more money into the non major sports. because theres not really much more they can spend on their big 3 sports. at least after the initial few years with them taking care of some "wish list" type stuff they had planned for later
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,923
4,639
113
Things are going so well I expect a South Western Conference style smack down soon. It's the State fan in me.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Wow what a terrible thread. 4 pages and zero common-sense posts. They talked about how big of idiot Travis was, how his numbers were wrong, etc -- while they were the ones getting it wrong.

Texas makes $21.3 mil on tier 1 and tier 2(plus bowls and NCAATourney revenue). SEC received about $22 mil in the same regard. We'll call the net difference zero.

They make $12 mil from the LHN. That means that the SECNetwork only has to produce north of $12mil per team in order to surpass Texas in terms of TV revenue. Something that you don't have to be a mathematician to see we're going to destroy. Really, REALLY elementary -- yet none of them got it.
 

WayboDawg

Redshirt
Jun 7, 2013
1,219
1
38
If Texas was smart, they would jump ship with Oklahoma to the Pac 12 in order to get some of this big conference money floating around. Then again, the Pac 12 may no longer want Texas. They are about to kick off their own network with the schools they already have, and probably have no desire to invite a bunch of alpha male personalities from Texas into their league and screw everything up.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
If Texas was smart, they would jump ship with Oklahoma to the Pac 12 in order to get some of this big conference money floating around. Then again, the Pac 12 may no longer want Texas. They are about to kick off their own network with the schools they already have, and probably have no desire to invite a bunch of alpha male personalities from Texas into their league and screw everything up.

I'm not a big Clay Travis fan, but he has this right. Texas misplayed their hand. I do think the Pac-12 would take them though, for two reasons. 1) It would give them an opportunity to re-negotiate their TV deal. Right now, their TV network is largely regional, and I'm betting they're wishing they got more than they did. Adding OU and Texas would allow them to take it national, which is A LOT more money, and 2) getting 2 other states into their conference would be a big boost to their TV contract as well.

The tricky part is that I don't know that the state legislatures in Texas and Oklahoma would allow those two to skate without taking Okie State, Texas Tech, and Baylor along for the ride.

I know Baylor was a big hang up the last time the Big 12 tried to make a play for Texas, Texas A&M, Tech, and OU.

The Pac-12 may have to go to 16 teams to make it happen and figure out which way it could work politically. Certainly, the Big 12 is on the shakiest ground of the Big 5 right now, and only because of Texas's TV deal.

The other reason it won't happen is because it would require Texas admitting they were wrong, and it would require them going to a conference where they had to share equally, a conference that treats Washington State the same as USC. They like their tipped scales conference, and they certainly don't want to admit they made a mistake.

The LHN turned out to be a huge bust, and it is in large part because the LHN can only show Big 12 games if the opponent agrees to it (they never do), and therefore the LHN only has access to non-conference games, and as of right now, teams entering into home and homes with Texas are almost universally having it written into the contract that they can't use the LHN for the game in Austin.

Our game in Austin last year will probably go down as the best game (for viewership) that the LHN will ever broadcast, and the only reason they got rights to that game is because the contract was signed before the LHN existed. No future contracts with major OOC schools are going to allow for that.
 

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,850
10,694
113
Looks like our f'n Indian burial ground is sitting in the middle of a Tuscaloosa marine shale play.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Brighthouse and Time Warner just got it done... Leaving DTV as the only huge player, along with FiOS, Charter, and Cablevision among the biggest shoes left to drop...

It's looking good for a clean sweep right now...
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,954
26,399
113
The PAC-12 has already turned Texas down. They won't take Texas unless Texas gives up the Longhorn Network & joins their network.
 

rabiddawg

Redshirt
Aug 19, 2010
2,017
0
0
HaHa. No one gives a damn about the NCAA anymore. Slime publicly castrated them with the DIV talk.