Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129484429" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>Its clear that you are desperate to paint a picture for some reason that there is a problem here for the BIG 12.&nbsp; The leaders of the conference are aware of the LHN contract and believe that they will be able to keep UT &quot;whole&quot; while at the same time converting, merging, blending-whatever the method, the LHN into a BIG 12 network.&nbsp; I'm sure the media will fill you in on what details they can once its happened.&nbsp; There's no reason for you to worry or pretend it can't be done.&nbsp; Okahoma's president has first hand direct knowledge of the situation, its really rather silly to pretend he is &quot;guessing&quot; or just making wild claims without supporting evidence.&nbsp; After all, he meets face to face with the leaders of Texas--pretty sure they'll ask him and the other members &quot;how&quot;-and again face to face.&nbsp; The conference has been studying these issues over five years now after all.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129484429, member: 1428007"] Its clear that you are desperate to paint a picture for some reason that there is a problem here for the BIG 12. The leaders of the conference are aware of the LHN contract and believe that they will be able to keep UT "whole" while at the same time converting, merging, blending-whatever the method, the LHN into a BIG 12 network. I'm sure the media will fill you in on what details they can once its happened. There's no reason for you to worry or pretend it can't be done. Okahoma's president has first hand direct knowledge of the situation, its really rather silly to pretend he is "guessing" or just making wild claims without supporting evidence. After all, he meets face to face with the leaders of Texas--pretty sure they'll ask him and the other members "how"-and again face to face. The conference has been studying these issues over five years now after all. [/QUOTE]

Name