Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College football injury updates entering Week 2: Latest at Alabama, Tennessee & more
On3:
Best Bets: Brett McMurphy's college football picks of Week 2
On3:
The $40 million myth: No college football roster has hit the mark (yet)
On3:
EA Sports' updated player contract creates complications for College Football 27
North Carolina:
Nick Saban defines Charlotte game as a must-win for North Carolina, Bill Belichick: 'No doubt'
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papillion" data-source="post: 129488919" data-attributes="member: 1643924"><p>Who is trying to close these discussions down? Name one person who actually asked everyone to stop discussing this? What I and the other guy are questioning is why Buck has been so intent on arguing this situation ad nausea to the point where he answers every single post, especially the ones who disagree with him. </p><p>A person who has spent this much time doing that is not just a passing fan. He is working for someone who's agenda is to move expansion to fruition.</p><p>I never said I was against expansion, at least I don't think I did. With the right teams then do it. But don't do it just to do it and definitely don't do it just because a bunch of outsiders said so.</p><p>I just don't like someone like Buck who comes here saying he's a WVU fan, and maybe he is but he talks of WVU like they're a metaphor, like in the third person or something. And this is the only subject I see him talking about. And he has a convenient way of reversing things on someone that "you" accuse him of.</p><p>Read Sky's post then read Bucks again and tell me where Sky asked him not to discuss this subject. Do you understand what Sky is saying? Look how Buck answered him by accusing him of having an agenda. If anyone has an agenda it's Buck. My point is just come out and say who you're actually fighting for and be done with it. Regardless what anyone sees, he argues like he has some vested interest in this without admitting it and that's the point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papillion, post: 129488919, member: 1643924"] Who is trying to close these discussions down? Name one person who actually asked everyone to stop discussing this? What I and the other guy are questioning is why Buck has been so intent on arguing this situation ad nausea to the point where he answers every single post, especially the ones who disagree with him. A person who has spent this much time doing that is not just a passing fan. He is working for someone who's agenda is to move expansion to fruition. I never said I was against expansion, at least I don't think I did. With the right teams then do it. But don't do it just to do it and definitely don't do it just because a bunch of outsiders said so. I just don't like someone like Buck who comes here saying he's a WVU fan, and maybe he is but he talks of WVU like they're a metaphor, like in the third person or something. And this is the only subject I see him talking about. And he has a convenient way of reversing things on someone that "you" accuse him of. Read Sky's post then read Bucks again and tell me where Sky asked him not to discuss this subject. Do you understand what Sky is saying? Look how Buck answered him by accusing him of having an agenda. If anyone has an agenda it's Buck. My point is just come out and say who you're actually fighting for and be done with it. Regardless what anyone sees, he argues like he has some vested interest in this without admitting it and that's the point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom