Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
Field of 68
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
MegaBoard
Hot
All-America Team
Rivals300
Field of 68
Message Boards
Where Michigan, QB Bryce Underwood stand following Sherrone Moore firing
Skeptics cast doubt on College Sports Commission's participation agreement
College Football Playoff predictions: J.D. PicKell reveals his picks for entire bracket
Michigan Head Coach Hot Board: Top candidates to replace Sherrone Moore
College Football Playoff: Predicting who will win the national title?
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mountaineer Steve" data-source="post: 129489153" data-attributes="member: 1495432"><p>Buck, what the heck are you talking about? I said nothing about the BIG12 having a 75% chance of a rematch I was talking about the PAC12. Last year the PAC12 and I think the BIG, made a change that forces a 9 game in conference schedule By math that means with 12 teams and a 9 in conference games there is a 75% chance of a rematch and yet I did not hear anyone screaming OMG rematch, rematch</p><p></p><p>This proved to be the case In just the 1st year of implementation as the PAC CCG featured a rematch of Stanford and USC. As I indicated while not a guarantee of a rematch it certainly is a high percentage, and you don't see anyone claiming the sky is falling and they are at a disadvantage. And please don't say, well the PAC did not get in so it was a disadvantage. No the PAC did not get in because their best team Stanford had 2 losses. Had UNC beaten Clemson, a two lose Stanford team would have gotten in over a 1 loss UNC team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mountaineer Steve, post: 129489153, member: 1495432"] Buck, what the heck are you talking about? I said nothing about the BIG12 having a 75% chance of a rematch I was talking about the PAC12. Last year the PAC12 and I think the BIG, made a change that forces a 9 game in conference schedule By math that means with 12 teams and a 9 in conference games there is a 75% chance of a rematch and yet I did not hear anyone screaming OMG rematch, rematch This proved to be the case In just the 1st year of implementation as the PAC CCG featured a rematch of Stanford and USC. As I indicated while not a guarantee of a rematch it certainly is a high percentage, and you don't see anyone claiming the sky is falling and they are at a disadvantage. And please don't say, well the PAC did not get in so it was a disadvantage. No the PAC did not get in because their best team Stanford had 2 losses. Had UNC beaten Clemson, a two lose Stanford team would have gotten in over a 1 loss UNC team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom