Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129503358" data-attributes="member: 1428007">Again, you are wrong.&nbsp; If the BIG 12 forms a network, the schools will all make $4 million to $6 million MORE than they do NOW.&nbsp; The $2 million or $4 million doesn't &quot;go away&quot;, The product that is making the $2 to $4 million is rolled into the BIG 12 network and on top of that $2 to $4 million the BIG 12 schools make an additional $4 to $6 million--again according to the University of Oklahoma's president.&nbsp; There is not any counting of any revenue twice. Boren didn't say that instead of making $2 or $4 million as they do now, they would make $4 or $6 million as you seem desperate to imply.&nbsp; He stated very clearly that the schools would make $4 to $6 million MORE than they make NOW.As far as the projection above, the numbers are accurate.&nbsp; If the conference gets $1.00 per subscriber in-market with two new teams, and $.20 per subscriber out of market with a total pay subscriber penetration of 55% of paying people--then YES, each BIG 12 school will get revenues (before expenses) from that network of well over $8 million per school.&nbsp; Anyone can do the math, it is correct.&nbsp; The unknown for us is only how much would the expenses be, and do the experts predict a 55% penetration into pay subscribers, and what do they think could be gotten money-wise for that in and out of market.&nbsp; $1.00 and $.20 are reasonable projections based on what others are recieving and 55% penetration&nbsp; including all in and out of market subscribers is reasonable as well.&nbsp; Its less than what the B10 or SEC get now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129503358, member: 1428007"] Again, you are wrong. If the BIG 12 forms a network, the schools will all make $4 million to $6 million MORE than they do NOW. The $2 million or $4 million doesn't "go away", The product that is making the $2 to $4 million is rolled into the BIG 12 network and on top of that $2 to $4 million the BIG 12 schools make an additional $4 to $6 million--again according to the University of Oklahoma's president. There is not any counting of any revenue twice. Boren didn't say that instead of making $2 or $4 million as they do now, they would make $4 or $6 million as you seem desperate to imply. He stated very clearly that the schools would make $4 to $6 million MORE than they make NOW. As far as the projection above, the numbers are accurate. If the conference gets $1.00 per subscriber in-market with two new teams, and $.20 per subscriber out of market with a total pay subscriber penetration of 55% of paying people--then YES, each BIG 12 school will get revenues (before expenses) from that network of well over $8 million per school. Anyone can do the math, it is correct. The unknown for us is only how much would the expenses be, and do the experts predict a 55% penetration into pay subscribers, and what do they think could be gotten money-wise for that in and out of market. $1.00 and $.20 are reasonable projections based on what others are recieving and 55% penetration including all in and out of market subscribers is reasonable as well. Its less than what the B10 or SEC get now. [/QUOTE]

Name