Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129504237" data-attributes="member: 1428007">I am certain everyone else that has comprehension skills understood exactly what I stated.No one, not me, not Boren or anyone else has said that if the BIG 12 starts a network they'll have a network AND still have tier 3 rights.  You simply have no comprehension or are playing games.You claimed if the BIG 12 had a network, they would only make $4 to $6 million each.I stated and showed with actual numbers with math anyone can do and see for themselves that if the BIG 12 met certain benchmarks of 55% of existing numbers of all pay tv subscribers, $1.00 in territory and $.20 Out of territory that each school will end up with $8-$9 million in revenues as opposed to the i.e., $2 or $4 million they get now from their tier III rights for television.Further I showed this correlates directly with Oklahoma's president stating that the conference schools are now losing $4 to $6 million apiece by not having a network.  In saying that he is clearly stating take what BIG 12 schools make RIGHT NOW and add $4 to $6 million to that if there were a BIG 12 network. NOT subtract what BIG 12 schools get now from their tier III deals and then add $4 to $6 million to what's left as you want to claim, but is 100% false.If you can't understand that simple information, then you need to seek help elsewhere.  You are wrong but for some reason not capable of admitting your continued errors in your efforts to disparage the BIG 12.</blockquote>

Name

Disable Video Player

Top Bottom

Lane Kiffin is not the underdog at Ole Miss, no matter what he tells his LSU players

College football Polymarket predictions: Staples' best trades of Week 3

What Michael Alford's firing means for Mike Norvell, Florida State

College Football TV Ratings: Most-watched games of Week 2

NOPD no longer sending mounted units to Oxford for Ole Miss-LSU game

Reply to thread

Latest