Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129504602" data-attributes="member: 1428007">Its bad enough you dont know what you are talking about.&nbsp; You also cant admit it.Boren said each BIG 12 school is losing $4 to $6 million per year.&nbsp; He never said that if the BIG 12 added a network then subtract from what schools make now and then add $4 to $6 million back to that lower amount.&nbsp; You concocted that out of nothing.&nbsp; Basic comprehension - &quot;schools are losing&nbsp; by not having&quot; is like stating &quot; if they had, schools would gain. &quot;Further, one cannot take what one league made- not knowing any numbers used to get to that outcome-and then state that 1 +1 doesnt equal two because the other league didnt get 2.&nbsp; That is ignorance at its finest.&nbsp; My numbers add up exactly as shown.&nbsp; You claim otherwise based on jibberish that is unrelated. Clearly the actual numbers Big 10 schools got was based on completely different numbers and distribution than my model shows for the BIG 12.&nbsp; That doesnt change the accuracy if the BIG 12 met my projections.&nbsp; Add it up yourself and use the numbers i provided to show a mistake- dont use something completely unrelated in any way.&nbsp; You cannot because my numbers are accurate - again if they met my projections using the stats shown.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129504602, member: 1428007"] Its bad enough you dont know what you are talking about. You also cant admit it. Boren said each BIG 12 school is losing $4 to $6 million per year. He never said that if the BIG 12 added a network then subtract from what schools make now and then add $4 to $6 million back to that lower amount. You concocted that out of nothing. Basic comprehension - "schools are losing by not having" is like stating " if they had, schools would gain. " Further, one cannot take what one league made- not knowing any numbers used to get to that outcome-and then state that 1 +1 doesnt equal two because the other league didnt get 2. That is ignorance at its finest. My numbers add up exactly as shown. You claim otherwise based on jibberish that is unrelated. Clearly the actual numbers Big 10 schools got was based on completely different numbers and distribution than my model shows for the BIG 12. That doesnt change the accuracy if the BIG 12 met my projections. Add it up yourself and use the numbers i provided to show a mistake- dont use something completely unrelated in any way. You cannot because my numbers are accurate - again if they met my projections using the stats shown. [/QUOTE]

Name

Lane Kiffin is not the underdog at Ole Miss, no matter what he tells his LSU players

College football Polymarket predictions: Staples' best trades of Week 3

What Michael Alford's firing means for Mike Norvell, Florida State

College Football TV Ratings: Texas' win vs. Ohio State averages 14 million viewers, leads Week 2

Jake Butt claims Michigan's defense can 'take them as far as they want to go' following Oklahoma win

Reply to thread

Latest