Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Tracking college football’s highest-paid wide receivers
On3:
Nearly 50 years after Herschel Walker's debut, the Georgia-Tennessee rivalry still endures
On3:
QB Ryan Staub emerges at Colorado and what that says about Deion Sanders
On3:
Facing a must-win gauntlet, Florida's Billy Napier doubles down
On3:
ESPN ranks Big Ten Football teams from first to last ahead of Week 3
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="michaelwalkerbr" data-source="post: 129514896" data-attributes="member: 1601483"><p>One more thing. A GOR between the members of a conference and any broadcast entity would do nothing to solidify the strength of the conference. The same networks own the broadcast rights to nearly all of the power 5 conferences. If the GOR was between the schools and broadcasters, why would they care who moved where? To have any meaning at all, individual schools have to 'sell' their tier I and II rights to the conference in exchange for a percentage of conference broadcast income as a member. </p><p></p><p>That not only ties the school to the conference, it allows the conference to then privately enter into monetary deals with broadcasters that it deems most profitable. They are essentially telling each school, you get your share of whatever profits we can generate as long as you remain in this conference. If you leave, you get no share while we retain your broadcast revenue as agreed in the GOR. Otherwise a GOR is meaningless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="michaelwalkerbr, post: 129514896, member: 1601483"] One more thing. A GOR between the members of a conference and any broadcast entity would do nothing to solidify the strength of the conference. The same networks own the broadcast rights to nearly all of the power 5 conferences. If the GOR was between the schools and broadcasters, why would they care who moved where? To have any meaning at all, individual schools have to 'sell' their tier I and II rights to the conference in exchange for a percentage of conference broadcast income as a member. That not only ties the school to the conference, it allows the conference to then privately enter into monetary deals with broadcasters that it deems most profitable. They are essentially telling each school, you get your share of whatever profits we can generate as long as you remain in this conference. If you leave, you get no share while we retain your broadcast revenue as agreed in the GOR. Otherwise a GOR is meaningless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom