Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129517875" data-attributes="member: 1428007">Its great you believe the &quot;Oklahoma&quot; document is real.&nbsp; That doesn't make it real however.&nbsp; There's no need for hostility.&nbsp; If someone presents something as a factual document, but the source of that document and the availability of that document publicly is questionable, then you may not like it, but proof is required (as is the case here since not only is the contract embedded in the tv contracts which I've provided links for, they are also the documents of a private corporation, the source is claiming to provide a BIG 12 document but somehow can't manage to find one from his own conference?).Referencing a known homer blogger for another conference that has taken one BIG 12 member and would like more, a person that often puts out disparaging and incorrect info about the BIG 12, and claiming him as a good source when for some magical reason he can't produce the Big Ten's grant of rights should be setting off warning lights in anyone.Its rude to claim that the document is real and become indignant when simple tests of the validity can be done-and yes you are making an attempt at getting verification although not from the supposed source which is either the BIG 12 office or the University of Oklahoma. At the same time you are saying if WVU tells you the document is not public, then the Oklahoma document is still real?&nbsp; No.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129517875, member: 1428007"] Its great you believe the "Oklahoma" document is real. That doesn't make it real however. There's no need for hostility. If someone presents something as a factual document, but the source of that document and the availability of that document publicly is questionable, then you may not like it, but proof is required (as is the case here since not only is the contract embedded in the tv contracts which I've provided links for, they are also the documents of a private corporation, the source is claiming to provide a BIG 12 document but somehow can't manage to find one from his own conference?). Referencing a known homer blogger for another conference that has taken one BIG 12 member and would like more, a person that often puts out disparaging and incorrect info about the BIG 12, and claiming him as a good source when for some magical reason he can't produce the Big Ten's grant of rights should be setting off warning lights in anyone. Its rude to claim that the document is real and become indignant when simple tests of the validity can be done-and yes you are making an attempt at getting verification although not from the supposed source which is either the BIG 12 office or the University of Oklahoma. At the same time you are saying if WVU tells you the document is not public, then the Oklahoma document is still real? No. [/QUOTE]

Name

College football insider: How Ole Miss retained Trinidad Chambliss and Kewan Lacy, plus KaMario Taylor's SEC test & more

How LSU OC Charlie Weis Jr. became the man Lane Kiffin trusts with his offense

Jon Sumrall landed at Florida, but sliding doors nearly sent him elsewhere

Stephen A. Smith backs off promise to attend Lane Kiffin's Week 3 return to Oxford

Several commitments, a 4-star flip target and more touted prospects visiting TCU on Saturday

Reply to thread

Latest