Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Scores
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
CFB Schedule
AP Poll
HSFB Rankings
NIL Valuations
Team Recruiting Rankings
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
College football insider: How Ole Miss retained Trinidad Chambliss and Kewan Lacy, plus KaMario Taylor's SEC test & more
How LSU OC Charlie Weis Jr. became the man Lane Kiffin trusts with his offense
Jon Sumrall landed at Florida, but sliding doors nearly sent him elsewhere
Stephen A. Smith backs off promise to attend Lane Kiffin's Week 3 return to Oxford
Several commitments, a 4-star flip target and more touted prospects visiting TCU on Saturday
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129536155" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>Well, I've tried to answer this multiple times. The biggest thing is, ESPN got read the riot act from Disney last year about expenses. So ESPN isn't going to greenlight anything until they are about as sure as possible that it won't lose money.</p><p></p><p>To that point, it will ultimately come down to carriage. Of the four networks launched so far (BTN, SECN, PacN, LHN) only the SECN was profitable right off the bat. The other three took at least a couple of years to turn a profit. That's because it took them some time to get enough carriage to be profitable. I posted the link in another thread where Georgia Tech's president said that ESPN wanted to assure carriage before launching the network. That could mean the ACC simply can't get enough carriage. Or, it could mean that ESPN simply wants to negotiate carriage deals first, before actually forming the network, and therefore not have to go through the "growing pains" for the first few years. That's not an unreasonable course of action.</p><p></p><p>One other issue could be the syndication contracts. There are several years left on them, so ESPN might prefer to wait until they expire or become reduced.</p><p></p><p>That said, it still may not be that the ACC gets a network. It may turn out that it won't get enough subscribers. My only issue is that you assume that since it doesn't have one now, that this means there won't be enough subscribers. That's not a reasonable assumption, given the issues I listed above, and that 2017 had always been the target date from the beginning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129536155, member: 1459051"] Well, I've tried to answer this multiple times. The biggest thing is, ESPN got read the riot act from Disney last year about expenses. So ESPN isn't going to greenlight anything until they are about as sure as possible that it won't lose money. To that point, it will ultimately come down to carriage. Of the four networks launched so far (BTN, SECN, PacN, LHN) only the SECN was profitable right off the bat. The other three took at least a couple of years to turn a profit. That's because it took them some time to get enough carriage to be profitable. I posted the link in another thread where Georgia Tech's president said that ESPN wanted to assure carriage before launching the network. That could mean the ACC simply can't get enough carriage. Or, it could mean that ESPN simply wants to negotiate carriage deals first, before actually forming the network, and therefore not have to go through the "growing pains" for the first few years. That's not an unreasonable course of action. One other issue could be the syndication contracts. There are several years left on them, so ESPN might prefer to wait until they expire or become reduced. That said, it still may not be that the ACC gets a network. It may turn out that it won't get enough subscribers. My only issue is that you assume that since it doesn't have one now, that this means there won't be enough subscribers. That's not a reasonable assumption, given the issues I listed above, and that 2017 had always been the target date from the beginning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3 Football
College football insider: How Ole Miss retained Trinidad Chambliss and Kewan Lacy, plus KaMario Taylor's SEC test & more
02
On3 Football
How LSU OC Charlie Weis Jr. became the man Lane Kiffin trusts with his offense
03
On3 Football
Jon Sumrall landed at Florida, but sliding doors nearly sent him elsewhere
04
On3 Football
Stephen A. Smith backs off promise to attend Lane Kiffin's Week 3 return to Oxford
05
Rivals Football Recruiting
Several commitments, a 4-star flip target and more touted prospects visiting TCU on Saturday
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom