Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Schedule
College Football Scores
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
New
Injury Report
TV Schedule
CFB Schedule
HSFB Scores
AP Poll
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
The LSU-Ole Miss grudge match is finally here, and it's 'personal' on both sides
South Carolina and Mississippi State meet in an early SEC game that could define both programs
College Football Predictions: McMurphy's best Week 3 trades
Toledo offensive lineman cannot afford a lawyer and might represent himself in NCAA suit
Stephen A. Smith calls for Lane Kiffin to embrace 'pariah' role outside LSU
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129536155" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>Well, I've tried to answer this multiple times. The biggest thing is, ESPN got read the riot act from Disney last year about expenses. So ESPN isn't going to greenlight anything until they are about as sure as possible that it won't lose money.</p><p></p><p>To that point, it will ultimately come down to carriage. Of the four networks launched so far (BTN, SECN, PacN, LHN) only the SECN was profitable right off the bat. The other three took at least a couple of years to turn a profit. That's because it took them some time to get enough carriage to be profitable. I posted the link in another thread where Georgia Tech's president said that ESPN wanted to assure carriage before launching the network. That could mean the ACC simply can't get enough carriage. Or, it could mean that ESPN simply wants to negotiate carriage deals first, before actually forming the network, and therefore not have to go through the "growing pains" for the first few years. That's not an unreasonable course of action.</p><p></p><p>One other issue could be the syndication contracts. There are several years left on them, so ESPN might prefer to wait until they expire or become reduced.</p><p></p><p>That said, it still may not be that the ACC gets a network. It may turn out that it won't get enough subscribers. My only issue is that you assume that since it doesn't have one now, that this means there won't be enough subscribers. That's not a reasonable assumption, given the issues I listed above, and that 2017 had always been the target date from the beginning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129536155, member: 1459051"] Well, I've tried to answer this multiple times. The biggest thing is, ESPN got read the riot act from Disney last year about expenses. So ESPN isn't going to greenlight anything until they are about as sure as possible that it won't lose money. To that point, it will ultimately come down to carriage. Of the four networks launched so far (BTN, SECN, PacN, LHN) only the SECN was profitable right off the bat. The other three took at least a couple of years to turn a profit. That's because it took them some time to get enough carriage to be profitable. I posted the link in another thread where Georgia Tech's president said that ESPN wanted to assure carriage before launching the network. That could mean the ACC simply can't get enough carriage. Or, it could mean that ESPN simply wants to negotiate carriage deals first, before actually forming the network, and therefore not have to go through the "growing pains" for the first few years. That's not an unreasonable course of action. One other issue could be the syndication contracts. There are several years left on them, so ESPN might prefer to wait until they expire or become reduced. That said, it still may not be that the ACC gets a network. It may turn out that it won't get enough subscribers. My only issue is that you assume that since it doesn't have one now, that this means there won't be enough subscribers. That's not a reasonable assumption, given the issues I listed above, and that 2017 had always been the target date from the beginning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3 Football
The LSU-Ole Miss grudge match is finally here, and it's 'personal' on both sides
02
On3 Football
South Carolina and Mississippi State meet in an early SEC game that could define both programs
03
Sports Predictions
College Football Predictions: McMurphy's best Week 3 trades
04
On3 Football
Toledo offensive lineman cannot afford a lawyer and might represent himself in NCAA suit
05
On3 Football
Stephen A. Smith calls for Lane Kiffin to embrace 'pariah' role outside LSU
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom