Fake electors?

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Dont remember reading about that in the Constitution? I would love to read a post explaining how your “rule of law”, “Constitutional preservationist”, party leader was initiating this scam as a lawful, Constitutional, action meant to reflect the will of the people of which he represented. Anyone????
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,236
6,906
113
Dont remember reading about that in the Constitution? I would love to read a post explaining how your “rule of law”, “Constitutional preservationist”, party leader was initiating this scam as a lawful, Constitutional, action meant to reflect the will of the people of which he represented. Anyone????
There are those that still feel the statistics do not add up. How do you lose 3,000 more counties than Obama and still get 10 mill more votes. Why would blacks vote more for Biden than Obama? I don't want to think our election was stolen but nobody can explain away that fact in a competent way. One precinct in Cleveland was 100% for Obama, how can you vote more than 100% for Biden? Why did massive numbers of mail in ballots only have one vote on them and that was for Biden? Nobody else. There should be only in person voting with ID. Absentee's should be allowed only when requested with an ID
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
So
There are those that still feel the statistics do not add up. How do you lose 3,000 more counties than Obama and still get 10 mill more votes. Why would blacks vote more for Biden than Obama? I don't want to think our election was stolen but nobody can explain away that fact in a competent way. One precinct in Cleveland was 100% for Obama, how can you vote more than 100% for Biden? Why did massive numbers of mail in ballots only have one vote on them and that was for Biden? Nobody else. There should be only in person voting with ID. Absentee's should be allowed only when requested with an ID
so we should run a scam, completely devoid of any Constitutional backing to change the results of the election then?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,206
3,282
113
So

so we should run a scam, completely devoid of any Constitutional backing to change the results of the election then?
Is this the sending alternate electors thing that’s already been discussed on here? Or is this something new?
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Dont remember reading about that in the Constitution? I would love to read a post explaining how your “rule of law”, “Constitutional preservationist”, party leader was initiating this scam as a lawful, Constitutional, action meant to reflect the will of the people of which he represented. Anyone????
On one side they speak of constitutionality of elections, and in another they support federal and state mandates by executive leaders that bypass the PEOPLE'S elected legislature who is supposed to govern the people and make the laws. Interesting.
 
Last edited:

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Is this the sending alternate electors thing that’s already been discussed on here? Or is this something new?
I dont know if it was discussed before on here, i dont read every ******* thread. But yes, “alternate” electors, whatever bs label you want to assign to it, that makes it seem like it wasnt a scheme to overturn the election results.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
One one side they speak of constitutionality of elections, and in another they support federal and state mandates by executive leaders that bypass the PEOPLE'S elected legislature who is supposed to govern the people and make the laws. Interesting.
What is interesting? How much bs you people believe just because you read it on the internet. FB isnt real.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,236
6,906
113
So

so we should run a scam, completely devoid of any Constitutional backing to change the results of the election then?
Can you legitimately explain that discrepancy? That's all I'm asking. When one precinct in Cleveland voted 100% for Obama, how can it vote more than 100%?
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
What is interesting? How much bs you people believe just because you read it on the internet. FB isnt real.
#1: I don't have social media and don't get on it

#2: I must have hit a nerve.

EDIT: Who exactly is "you people"? I'm a Democrat, no support for Trump.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Dont remember reading about that in the Constitution? I would love to read a post explaining how your “rule of law”, “Constitutional preservationist”, party leader was initiating this scam as a lawful, Constitutional, action meant to reflect the will of the people of which he represented. Anyone????
Not fake, but alternate. This is not a new tactic, it's been used in the past. Your MSNBC friends have lost their collective minds.
 

WVUALLEN

All-American
Aug 4, 2009
72,702
5,500
113
#1: I don't have social media and don't get on it

#2: I must have hit a nerve.

EDIT: Who exactly is "you people"? I'm a Democrat, no support for Trump.
This site would be considered social media.

Definition of social media
Forums are an element of social media technologies which take on many different forms including blogs, business networks, enterprise social networks, forums, microblogs, photo sharing, products/services review, social bookmarking, social gaming, social networks, video sharing and virtual worlds.

But I get it where you're coming from. You don't use any of the top 5 social media venues, or these type of sports and political forums are the only ones you use.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,206
3,282
113
I dont know if it was discussed before on here, i dont read every ****ing thread. But yes, “alternate” electors, whatever bs label you want to assign to it, that makes it seem like it wasnt a scheme to overturn the election results.
Do some research bud. This was a common thing being pushed by the left in 16 to install Hillary instead of Trump.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Not fake, but alternate. This is not a new tactic, it's been used in the past. Your MSNBC friends have lost their collective minds.
Yeah?
Do some research bud. This was a common thing being pushed by the left in 16 to install Hillary instead of Trump.
In 2016 there were “faithless” electors from multiple states (Wash was one i think) that broke from the EC, and these States have that ability under their Constitution - but the “alternate” electors plan? I dont think that has been a tactic used before.
 

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,033
128,534
113
Yeah?

In 2016 there were “faithless” electors from multiple states (Wash was one i think) that broke from the EC, and these States have that ability under their Constitution - but the “alternate” electors plan? I dont think that has been a tactic used before.
25th Amendment hasn't been used either. Doesn't mean it isn't a valid "tactic" that you guys cried to implement.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,236
6,906
113
Trump’s mouth
That still doesn't explain the results. I agree about Trump's mouth, hated it, but inner city people can't vote that well and certainly won't vote for just one person and nothing down ballot. It defies logic.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
That still doesn't explain the results. I agree about Trump's mouth, hated it, but inner city people can't vote that well and certainly won't vote for just one person and nothing down ballot. It defies logic.
What you are saying is our system is dead, there is a shadow government in place, and so well rooted, that we cant even elect our own President. And this shadow government, with the world’s greatest military, has free reign over the NWO.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,236
6,906
113
What you are saying is our system is dead, there is a shadow government in place, and so well rooted, that we cant even elect our own President. And this shadow government, with the world’s greatest military, has free reign over the NWO.
Not what I'm saying. I'm saying that all the ballots that were harvested that only had one vote on them sure seems fishy. You are saying that the vote was so pure that Biden got 10 millions more votes than a popular black president. It seems fishy because statistics do not lie.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
686
0
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
That still doesn't explain the results. I agree about Trump's mouth, hated it, but inner city people can't vote that well and certainly won't vote for just one person and nothing down ballot. It defies logic.
Matter of fact creepy Joe got fewer African American votes than either Hillary or Obama! Usually any Republican getting in excess of 10% of the monitory vote means the Democrat doesn't win.

Biden got less than 82% of the minority vote, got Trump got close to 20% (and more votes for his re-election than even Obama) yet Biden still got 80 million votes...more than any other candidate in history ever? 🤔

It is totally unexplainable unless you allow for massive fraud and cheating.

Hey you Trumpers....so what if I cheated? I won and you didn't!

OK creepy Joe...but look how many folks now don't even admit they cheated for you 'cause you're such a creepy screw up?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,848
279
83
On one side they speak of constitutionality of elections, and in another they support federal and state mandates by executive leaders that bypass the PEOPLE'S elected legislature who is supposed to govern the people and make the laws. Interesting.
Still confused about how this all works I see. Thanks for the daily entertainment. :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy:
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Geez…. You are really going after people over COVID on here. Am I wrong for wearing a mask? Am I wrong for not wantong to help this spread to people’s loved ones that have a very good chance at dying from this virus? Should I be ashamed of myself for these actions?
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
Geez…. You are really going after people over COVID on here. Am I wrong for wearing a mask? Am I wrong for not wantong to help this spread to people’s loved ones that have a very good chance at dying from this virus? Should I be ashamed of myself for these actions?
You are not wrong for wearing your mask , foolish maybe. You have a choice to wear it , wear it when you are alone in your car if it makes you feel better. Expecting others to wear one is where you are wrong, expecting others to get a pre treatment is wrong.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Geez…. You are really going after people over COVID on here. Am I wrong for wearing a mask? Am I wrong for not wantong to help this spread to people’s loved ones that have a very good chance at dying from this virus? Should I be ashamed of myself for these actions?
#1: You don't seem to be saying anything to Moe for wanting to throw my personal beliefs out the window.

#2: Masks and the vaccine doesn't prevent ANYONE from getting it. That is a proven fact. If you don't believe my word, take the CDC and WHO on it.

#3: If you or your loved ones are scared of catching it and falling in to the 0.02% that could die, then why don't you wear two masks....one for you and one for me? Since you believe they work.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
#1: You don't seem to be saying anything to Moe for wanting to throw my personal beliefs out the window.

#2: Masks and the vaccine doesn't prevent ANYONE from getting it. That is a proven fact. If you don't believe my word, take the CDC and WHO on it.

#3: If you or your loved ones are scared of catching it and falling in to the 0.02% that could die, then why don't you wear two masks....one for you and one for me? Since you believe they work.
#1: what?
#2: please, please, please link me to where you THINK the CDC and WHO say that masks and vaccines do not help prevent spread.
#3: me and my loved ones are healthy, i am not too worried about any of us getting it (esp the Omicron variant), but masking and vaccines is about helping prevent others from getting it - again, please post the FACT that they do not help the spread
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
You are not wrong for wearing your mask , foolish maybe. You have a choice to wear it , wear it when you are alone in your car if it makes you feel better. Expecting others to wear one is where you are wrong, expecting others to get a pre treatment is wrong.
I dont know. I am all for personal freedom, but i think if we are to look at legitimate information on this virus and what vaccines are, most would agree that masking and vaccines are safe and not really a big deal to do. I mean, the vaccine? Ok, i can understand SOME hesitation. But masking? I just dont get why it is such a big deal to people.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,848
279
83
#1: You don't seem to be saying anything to Moe for wanting to throw my personal beliefs out the window.

#2: Masks and the vaccine doesn't prevent ANYONE from getting it. That is a proven fact. If you don't believe my word, take the CDC and WHO on it.

#3: If you or your loved ones are scared of catching it and falling in to the 0.02% that could die, then why don't you wear two masks....one for you and one for me? Since you believe they work.
mean moe :joy:
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
#1: what?
#2: please, please, please link me to where you THINK the CDC and WHO say that masks and vaccines do not help prevent spread.
#3: me and my loved ones are healthy, i am not too worried about any of us getting it (esp the Omicron variant), but masking and vaccines is about helping prevent others from getting it - again, please post the FACT that they do not help the spread
#1: Seems people like you are all for personal freedoms, until you are not.

#2: Masks policies keep changing.......CDC once said "any mask will be good" to now saying "well, only the N95 mask will work".......And they are only 70% effective at best.

#3: the vaccines are not vaccines....they are pretreatment and has very little to do with "stopping the spread", Omicron has proven this.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
I dont know. I am all for personal freedom, but i think if we are to look at legitimate information on this virus and what vaccines are, most would agree that masking and vaccines are safe and not really a big deal to do. I mean, the vaccine? Ok, i can understand SOME hesitation. But masking? I just dont get why it is such a big deal to people.
Big deal because it dont do anything. It's just for show & nothing more.
If you need proof just watch studies from Israel or watch our own different states .
My skepticism of the vaccine started with the word games they have been playing all around this virus, it's not a vaccine it is a pretreatment, it does not stop the spread, look at Israel. Had they been honest with the number of deaths & calling this a pretreatment I might have a different view
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
#1: Seems people like you are all for personal freedoms, until you are not.

#2: Masks policies keep changing.......CDC once said "any mask will be good" to now saying "well, only the N95 mask will work".......And they are only 70% effective at best.

#3: the vaccines are not vaccines....they are pretreatment and has very little to do with "stopping the spread", Omicron has proven this.
#1: yeah, I hate when any personal freedoms are impeded on, but i like to pee outside, so i can understand having to make sacrifices for the good of the nation

#2: variants are changing how the virus is transmitted, and what constitutes being protected.

#3: pretreatment might be a better term to describe it, and i think you are correct. But there are factors that contribute to the inability for a virus to mutate and spread, that come from being vaccinated that I think you are unaware of - i will try to post some literature on it
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
#1: yeah, I hate when any personal freedoms are impeded on, but i like to pee outside, so i can understand having to make sacrifices for the good of the nation

#2: variants are changing how the virus is transmitted, and what constitutes being protected.

#3: pretreatment might be a better term to describe it, and i think you are correct. But there are factors that contribute to the inability for a virus to mutate and spread, that come from being vaccinated that I think you are unaware of - i will try to post some literature on it
#3: Me being unvaccinated has no bearing on whether I pass it to you or anyone else. It only affects MY CHANCES of severe illness, which I'm willing to take as I have my entire adult life. So when the government starts pushing vaccine mandates, yeah, I GET PISSED OFF a bit......as should anyone.........considering these mandates do NOTHING to "protect" someone else.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,848
279
83
It only affects MY CHANCES of severe illness,
It affects (reduces) everyone's chances of severe illness which helps to keep from overrunning our hospitals, but you knew that, right? Don't you think that's important? What other reason do you need? nevermind the preceding 2 questions because it doesn't matter what you think. Obviously keeping our hospitals from being overrun is a good enough reason to ask everyone to get vaccinated.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
It affects (reduces) everyone's chances of severe illness which helps to keep from overrunning our hospitals, but you knew that, right? Don't you think that's important? What other reason do you need? nevermind the preceding 2 questions because it doesn't matter what you think. Obviously keeping our hospitals from being overrun is a good enough reason to ask everyone to get vaccinated.
That’s a false narrative that you bought in to from the beginning. Remember those ships brought in to NY? Yeah. How many were used? Our health care system just went through the largest number of cases during this event. How did the hospitals handle it? Just fine.