DawgatAuburn said:You can't even have a rational discussion about it because your nose is so deeply anally implanted. The people who have been calling for a change (which do not include me, I might add) have done so for several years and not just after losses. It's the accumulation of 14 years of pretty good results that seem to have peaked. Some people think we can do better. It has nothing to do with "one game," which seems to be your transparent attempt to make people feel like they are jumping to an irrational conclusion when they have had 14 years to make up their minds.
Dawgbreeze said:Only our fans want to run off good coaches when they lose a game to an inferior team. Welcome to college basketball.
I have never said we should be Kentucky. Or Duke. Or Kansas or North Carolina. That's just you trying to deflect attention from the facts. The fact is there's plenty of room between us and Kentucky for us to move up in the world, but we've not been able to do it.Dawgbreeze wrote:
You dawg think we should be Kentucky. We never will be but we have done pretty good under Stans. I also know as a former player that sometimes it just is impossible to play with energy. That is the team I saw today other than Bost. It burned us and we will not be the only home ranked team to lose today. It happens but some of you sure look like you want to fan the flames when we lose. If we don't throw a bad pass or Steele hits his shot in regulation it is academic, but it is pretty obvious when Moultrie has a sub par game, we are in trouble. Most on here always jump to the conclusion it is coaching, I will say it is 99% on the players to make plays. We didn't today, they did. I guess your fans with the 14 year observation think the 3rd winningest coach in the SEC should be fired. Now, that is irrational thinking.
DawgatAuburn said:I have never said we should be Kentucky. Or Duke. Or Kansas or North Carolina. That's just you trying to deflect attention from the facts. The fact is there's plenty of room between us and Kentucky for us to move up in the world, but we've not been able to do it.Dawgbreeze wrote:
You dawg think we should be Kentucky. We never will be but we have done pretty good under Stans. I also know as a former player that sometimes it just is impossible to play with energy. That is the team I saw today other than Bost. It burned us and we will not be the only home ranked team to lose today. It happens but some of you sure look like you want to fan the flames when we lose. If we don't throw a bad pass or Steele hits his shot in regulation it is academic, but it is pretty obvious when Moultrie has a sub par game, we are in trouble. Most on here always jump to the conclusion it is coaching, I will say it is 99% on the players to make plays. We didn't today, they did. I guess your fans with the 14 year observation think the 3rd winningest coach in the SEC should be fired. Now, that is irrational thinking.
I totally disagree that it is 99% players. Again, that's just you trying to deflect your hero's shortcomings. Players a large part of it, but without a plan to put them in position to make plays, a staff to prepare for each opponent (because they're not all the same, which we seem to forget), a head coach to motivate the team when they aren't at their best, and an ability to manage the game from the bench (when to sub, when to call time outs, etc), then you get mediocrity.
Stans is not my hero. Are you actually trying to convince me that only coaches can motivate players? And then you think we didn't substitute okay today? There were no problems in the substitution patters. As far as calling a timeout, the last possesion we could have, and if we had, you and your doomsdayers would have criticized Stans for doing it if Georgia had had time to either change defenses or get set. We shot 46% compared to Ga's 40% so to criticize our offense is absurd. any idiot knows why we lost, the offensive rebounds and we looked gassed. I have no other reason to argue with you because after watching Florida, Creighton, Ohio State, and us all get beat today at home, I will remind you nobody is trying to fire the other teams' coaches but our ignorant fanbase is never satisfied that it could be anybody but our coaches fault. A sad excuse for MSU fans.
You really struggle with reading. Every statement I make is not an absolute or an extreme, yet that's how your thin skin interprets it. Like when I say we can do better, I mean we can be better than we are now without being on the level of Kentucky, which is how you try to spin it. I'll try to type slower so you can keep up.Dawgbreeze said:Stans is not my hero. Are you actually trying to convince me that only coaches can motivate players? And then you think we didn't substitute okay today? There were no problems in the substitution patters. As far as calling a timeout, the last possesion we could have, and if we had, you and your doomsdayers would have criticized Stans for doing it if Georgia had had time to either change defenses or get set. We shot 46% compared to Ga's 40% so to criticize our offense is absurd. any idiot knows why we lost, the offensive rebounds and we looked gassed. I have no other reason to argue with you because after watching Florida, Creighton, Ohio State, and us all get beat today at home, I will remind you nobody is trying to fire the other teams' coaches but our ignorant fanbase is never satisfied that it could be anybody but our coaches fault. A sad excuse for MSU fans.