There are at least 10 G5 coaches right now that wouldn't take our phone call. There's 10 more that would easily be an upgrade and probably 6 more that would be an under the radar upgrade. That puts him 95th out of 130. If not for Croom, who was only hired because Alabama interviewed him, Lebby would be the worst hire in Mississippi State history. Hopefully we realize that at the end of the year and just move on.The question I would like to know where he would be on a list of all FBS schools.
Who’s to say he’s not worse than Croom? Croom at least won two SEC games his first season, with a probation strapped roster.There are at least 10 G5 coaches right now that wouldn't take our phone call. There's 10 more that would easily be an upgrade and probably 6 more that would be an under the radar upgrade. That puts him 95th out of 130. If not for Croom, who was only hired because Alabama interviewed him, Lebby would be the worst hire in Mississippi State history. Hopefully we realize that at the end of the year and just move on.
Croom's defense far exceeded Lebby's.2 win seasons will do that. He also lost points for keeping the DC after being one of the worst defenses in the country.
I don't think Croomed will ever be replaced. I mean I had the Smack Apparel shirt from the Florida win that said "Hey Florida The Stark Reality is You We're Croomed & Marooned 38-31 Later Alligator!" It's permanently engrained in my brain, but definitely another one could be added though.Lebby just needs an inexplicable win for DITTLE LEBBIED to replace Croomed in the MSU Vernacular. **
![]()
Croom's defense far exceeded Lebby's.
Croom wasn’t hired because Alabama interviewed him.
Lebby did inherit a mess but still a team that managed to win 4 games and he halved that in his first season. I was in favor of giving him time to do his thing but, he presided over a team with the worst defense I have ever seen in my 64 years on this earth and refused to make a change. For that reason he should be coaching for his job this season.
Inherited a team that won 5 games and won 40% as many. For all the hell Arnett catches (mostly deserved), Lebby was not an upgrade at best, really a downgrade.Lebby did inherit a mess but still a team that managed to win 4 games and he halved that in his first season. I was in favor of giving him time to do his thing but, he presided over a team with the worst defense I have ever seen in my 64 years on this earth and refused to make a change. For that reason he should be coaching for his job this season.
In my book he went from give him some time to hot seat because of his lack of action on the defensive staff after last year's debacle.2 win seasons will do that. He also lost points for keeping the DC after being one of the worst defenses in the country.
Lebby inherited a much worse team than Arnett did. Arnett brought back a bunch from a 9 win team. Lebby inherited a team that lost a bunch of production and had to deal with Leach/Arnett's complete lack of recruiting, particularly on defense. Almost every single player Lebby lost off that roster he inherited transferred to a worse league. That being said, losing to Toledo is embarrassing and not acceptable. Bringing back Hutzler was also inexcusable.Inherited a team that won 5 games and won 40% as many. For all the hell Arnett catches (mostly deserved), Lebby was not an upgrade at best, really a downgrade.
It wasn't that much worse. Even Arnett would have won 3 games minimum last fall, maybe 4.Lebby inherited a much worse team than Arnett did. Arnett brought back a bunch from a 9 win team. Lebby inherited a team that lost a bunch of production and had to deal with Leach/Arnett's complete lack of recruiting. Almost every single player Lebby lost off that roster transferred to a worse league. That being said, losing to Toledo is embarrassing and not acceptable. Bringing back Hutzler was also inexcusable.
It was a lot worse defensively talent wise, but I agree that Arnett probably would have won 3 games.It wasn't that much worse. Even Arnett would have won 3 games minimum last fall, maybe 4.
If Arnette had promoted JR to OC and said over the next three years, we are getting away from the spread but ran the spread his first season he would have won some games he had 18 starters coming back from a ranked bowl game. He blew it.Inherited a team that won 5 games and won 40% as many. For all the hell Arnett catches (mostly deserved), Lebby was not an upgrade at best, really a downgrade.
Zero talentNo argument from me.
Posted this before, but if we scored the most points we scored in any SEC / P4 game in EVERY SEC game and P5 game last year, we would have still only gone 2-7 in those 9 games.
Also, if we surrendered the fewest amount of points of any SEC / P4 game in EVERY one of those games, we would have gone just 1-8 in those 9 games.
We were unimaginably terrible last year in every possible area. Sign of a coach and staff that is in way over their heads.
Didn’t Arnett inherit a ton of returning starters from a 9 win team?Inherited a team that won 5 games and won 40% as many. For all the hell Arnett catches (mostly deserved), Lebby was not an upgrade at best, really a downgrade.
That was one of the reasons.Croom wasn’t hired because Alabama interviewed him.
Is it too late to have an AD swap with Auburn? **And we have put the dude that hired Lebby in charge of hiring the head baseball coach.
I keep hoping against hope that there is someone with actual baseball knowledge helping our forlorn athletic director with this search. Our athletic dept is truly in a god-awful situation.Is it too late to have an AD swap with Auburn? **
(I trust Cohen on hiring more but maybe the blind squirrel will find that proverbial acorn… **)
Yes he did. Ray Charles would have won 9-10 games with that team. It took real work to go 5-7. I still wonder if Arnett was in Ole Miss employ to nuke the football programDidn’t Arnett inherit a ton of returning starters from a 9 win team?
Yes he did. Ray Charles would have won 9-10 games with that team. It took real work to go 5-7. I still wonder if Arnett was in Ole Miss employ to nuke the football program
arnett was worse than Lenny and worse than Croom. This is why he driving through Wendy’s naked and getting fired.
Seriously? That team was better than 5-7, big it was nowhere near a 9-win team. Not even close.Yes he did. Ray Charles would have won 9-10 games with that team. It took real work to go 5-7. I still wonder if Arnett was in Ole Miss employ to nuke the football program
arnett was worse than Lenny and worse than Croom. This is why he driving through Wendy’s naked and getting fired.
It returned everybody off of a 9 win team and had 8 home games. You’re highSeriously? That team was better than 5-7, big it was nowhere near a 9-win team. Not even close.
BUT… if we’d done both of those things in every SEC/P4 game, we would’ve gone 11-1 with 9 31-30 wins and a 17-41 loss to ToledoNo argument from me.
Posted this before, but if we scored the most points we scored in any SEC / P4 game in EVERY SEC game and P5 game last year, we would have still only gone 2-7 in those 9 games.
Also, if we surrendered the fewest amount of points of any SEC / P4 game in EVERY one of those games, we would have gone just 1-8 in those 9 games.
We were unimaginably terrible last year in every possible area. Sign of a coach and staff that is in way over their heads.