For everyone that wants to know why

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,390
24,168
113
They don't play defense in the NBA, look at these guys. Half of them look like they're about to pass out while standing there. These guys are gassed.
 

kired

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2008
7,005
2,322
113
It really is incredible how well they can shoot. Watch the shoot around before a game --- they don't miss.
 

Optimus Prime 4

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
8,560
0
0
After that I doubt we will hear much Lebron sucks talk

That was about as clutch as he possibly could have been. And he played great defense. He'll, even Bosh played Timmy hard.

great game, great series, really good playoffs overall.
 

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
That was about as clutch as he possibly could have been. And he played great defense. He'll, even Bosh played Timmy hard.

great game, great series, really good playoffs overall.

The Finals were good but overall I thought this was one of the worst playoffs in years. Injuries ruined what could have been some really good series. No Rondo. No Rose. No Deng. No Westbrook. No Granger. No Kobe.

Think how good the Knicks/Celtics could have been. Or the Heat/Bulls.
 

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,633
2,203
113
I thought the play offs were great

Clippers/Grizzlies, Thunder/Grizzlies, heat/Pacers, warriors/Spurs, and the NBA finals were all fun series to watch
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,932
5,785
113
The Finals were good but overall I thought this was one of the worst playoffs in years. Injuries ruined what could have been some really good series. No Rondo. No Rose. No Deng. No Westbrook. No Granger. No Kobe.

Think how good the Knicks/Celtics could have been. Or the Heat/Bulls.

The playoffs could have been much different, but im not sure they would have been much better(as in close and thrilling).
- No Rondo?...eh oh well, that team wasnt going deep even with him.
- No Rose or Deng?...this is where I agree with you as these guys could have really made the series more competitive. Maybe its that they still lose just as quickly, only there are less blowouts?...but the games would have been more competitive.
- No Westbrook?...I just dont think losing him made the playoffs bad. The Thunder lost games by 6, 6, 6, and 4. Those games were all very close, with one even going OT. It was a very competitive series, even if it ended 4-1 in favor of Memphis.
- No Granger?...because of no Granger, we got to see a breakout by George on the biggest stage. As Hibbert said, its the Pacers, they arent on TV, so the breakout was huge. And we saw Hibbert basically double his season scoring avg. If Granger played, the team dynamic would have been completely different. You really didnt think the Heat-Pacers series was a good series? I thought it was a great series. It matched the greatest player in the world against an ubertalented up and comer. The series had an OT game and went to game 7.
- No Kobe...yeah, that was a terrible series, but it was also a first round 2 vs 7 series. I dont expect 1vs8 and 2vs 7 series to be great, its an exception to the norm when they are. LA was horribly overmatched even with him, hence their hilariously bad season.



The only series that was bad and could have been great because of injuries was the Heat - Bulls.