For those who give a Rodent's Hind Quarters: Masoli's Stats

[Indndawg]

Masoli

 

[codeDawg]

[No message]

 

[Indndawg]

Perhaps little Brett will have a career not dissimilar to Masoli.

 

[thunderclap]

Seriously, has anybody ever watched them play and the offense they run. It looks nothing like the offense Nutt runs. Will it change some for him? Yes. Is their OL still filled with holes? Yes. Receivers? Do they get better with Masoli? Some. We'll see what Dave Rader, yes, Dave Rader, can do with him.

 

[Indndawg]

kfjlasfkljlj

 

[coach66]

running the ball on 3rd and 15 more times than not. It seems his passing game consisted mainly of short passes but I'm not sure. When Oregon got you spread out Masoli was pretty effective as were the rest of the running backs.

 

[TheStateUofMS]

Masoli is good....but I thought he would have more than 15TDs...and not trying to beat a dead horse, but SEC defense is a million times harder than the Pac 10's defense. The PAC 10 it's not that uncommon for a QB to throw for over 400 yards.<div>
</div><div>I remember several years back Arizona St was playing another PAC 10 teams and both QBs passed for over 500yds. I'm trying to research it but I can't find it. It was between 2004-2006 I believe.</div>

 

[HamilReb]

ku

 

[hatfieldms]

......

 

[HamilReb]

It was/is just as bad. If not worse.

Not a bad thing.

 

[Todd4State]

You don't think he can do better against an easier schedule?

 

[hatfieldms]

SEC is just a little tougher than the PAC 10 is