For you recruiting naysayers

Uncle Ruckus

All-American
Apr 1, 2011
14,441
5,392
113
And the ones who said Mullen was winning off of Crooms players and the class they both recruited. The leaders of this team, the redshirt seniors, true seniors and redshirt juniors, those guys are from Mullens first two classes that were suppose to be so terrible and started the whole Mullen can't recruit shtick. That's a big FU to you jabronis.
 

kired

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2008
7,024
2,348
113
The average ranking of our starting OL was 1.8 stars

Per the experts at scout

Clausell - 2 stars
Beckwith - NR, walkon
Day - 2 stars
Malone - 2 stars
Senior - 3 stars


LSU OL average was 3.6 stars. One 5, two 4, one 3, and one 2.
 
Last edited:

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,016
1,874
113
What were their DL and LB, cause that's who our 10 total stars OL destroyed last night.
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
Per the experts at scout

Clausell - 2 stars
Beckwith - NR, walkon
Day - 2 stars
Malone - 2 stars
Senior - 3 stars


LSU OL average was 3.6 stars. One 5, two 4, one 3, and one 2.

Does this mean we're really good at evaluating, Hevesy is one hell of a coach, or a mixture of both?
 

Red87

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2013
104
0
0
And the ones who said Mullen was winning off of Crooms players and the class they both recruited. The leaders of this team, the redshirt seniors, true seniors and redshirt juniors, those guys are from Mullens first two classes that were suppose to be so terrible and started the whole Mullen can't recruit shtick. That's a big FU to you jabronis.
So is the point that by recruiting this way you can successfully beat one of the big boys once every 7-9 years or so? No thanks . I'll take the players that are more ready to contribute now and just go ahead and claim that big win immediately . And if you're going to pull the " we just beat lsu card," awesome ... Come back after you beat them 3 out of six years like us. Or for that matter , more than once in 15 years .
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
So is the point that by recruiting this way you can successfully beat one of the big boys once every 7-9 years or so? No thanks . I'll take the players that are more ready to contribute now and just go ahead and claim that big win immediately . And if you're going to pull the " we just beat lsu card," awesome ... Come back after you beat them 3 out of six years like us. Or for that matter , more than once in 15 years .

Even better you come back when you've beat us 4 out of 5
 

Uncle Ruckus

All-American
Apr 1, 2011
14,441
5,392
113
You mad bro? You one of the ******** Bears? Come back after yall play bama and tell me how those stars did. What about all the crootin championships yall have had over the last 10 years? What has that gotten you? How about 3 head coaches in that time.
 

mount lefroy

Redshirt
Feb 10, 2013
2,501
0
36
Are you under the impression that teams use Internet recruiting sites to evaluate?

Well, besides Freeze I mean.
 

xxxWalkTheDawg

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2005
4,262
0
0
So is the point that by recruiting this way you can successfully beat one of the big boys once every 7-9 years or so? No thanks . I'll take the players that are more ready to contribute now and just go ahead and claim that big win immediately . And if you're going to pull the " we just beat lsu card," awesome ... Come back after you beat them 3 out of six years like us. Or for that matter , more than once in 15 years .

You pulling out that card after MSU has laid the wood to UM's *** 4 out of the past 5 years?? Didn't think this post through too well did you?
 

Red87

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2013
104
0
0
Even better you come back when you've beat us 4 out of 5
The difference between you guys and us is you would rather go 1-11 with a win over Ole Miss then 9-3 with a loss to them. No thanks. You can't win this argument because you know I'm right. I'll take a win over LSU or a similarly comparable team then a win over MSU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. You know why? Because no one gives a **** if a team beats MSU. They only care if you beat the LSU's. Congrats, you guys did it for the second time in twenty years. Awesome. Besides Vandy, MSU has less overall wins then any team in the in the SEC. How many bowl games have you guys won? 11 or 12? That's only about half of our total bowl wins so give it some time and you'll catch up.
 

Red87

Redshirt
Oct 24, 2013
104
0
0
We would never see him again.
And when we beat your *** in Oxford this year I expect you guys to have the same attitude that you did when we stomped you the last time Ol Danny boy came to Oxford: You'll want to fire him because winning against Ole Miss is the end all, be all. Hell, some of you geniuses wanted to fire him after almost losing the lead last night. I have to remember things like this so I can keep some perspective on who I'm dealing with.
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
The difference between you guys and us is you would rather go 1-11 with a win over Ole Miss then 9-3 with a loss to them. No thanks. You can't win this argument because you know I'm right. I'll take a win over LSU or a similarly comparable team then a win over MSU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. You know why? Because no one gives a **** if a team beats MSU. They only care if you beat the LSU's. Congrats, you guys did it for the second time in twenty years. Awesome. Besides Vandy, MSU has less overall wins then any team in the in the SEC. How many bowl games have you guys won? 11 or 12? That's only about half of our total bowl wins so give it some time and you'll catch up.

Funny you mention vandy... They've beat you 5 out of last 8. So over the last 5 years, we have an 80% winning % over you. Vandy has a 63% winning % over you the last 8 years. If the worst sec programs are beating you like this what does it say about you?
 
Last edited:

xxxWalkTheDawg

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2005
4,262
0
0
And when we beat your *** in Oxford this year I expect you guys to have the same attitude that you did when we stomped you the last time Ol Danny boy came to Oxford: You'll want to fire him because winning against Ole Miss is the end all, be all. Hell, some of you geniuses wanted to fire him after almost losing the lead last night. I have to remember things like this so I can keep some perspective on who I'm dealing with.

Boy. Looks like some preppy weakling is really taking good MSU press very hard. Hey... cheer up.. we beat your real rivals! Why you mad small fry? Keep throwing out your little made up UM approved stereotypes and keep tweeting the SEC that they need to suspend our players while you worship at the throne of Kimdashian. It will make you feel better.
 

msstate7

Redshirt
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
Boy. Looks like some preppy weakling is really taking good MSU press very hard. Hey... cheer up.. we beat your real rivals! Why you mad small fry? Keep throwing out your little made up UM approved stereotypes and keep tweeting the SEC that they need to suspend our players while you worship at the throne of Kimdashian. It will make you feel better.

Yep the Kim brothers beat up non football player and nothing should happen to him. Day may or may not have intentially landed on an lsu football player and he should be suspended. Bout right...
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
 

thunderclap

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
3,089
0
0
And when we beat your *** in Oxford this year I expect you guys to have the same attitude that you did when we stomped you the last time Ol Danny boy came to Oxford: You'll want to fire him because winning against Ole Miss is the end all, be all. Hell, some of you geniuses wanted to fire him after almost losing the lead last night. I have to remember things like this so I can keep some perspective on who I'm dealing with.

You and perspective do not belong in the same sentence.

Make the bet then, if you lose to us again, you disappear from the Pack. I would offer the same thing but I don't spend all day obsessing on the message boards of other schools.
 

xxxWalkTheDawg

Redshirt
Oct 21, 2005
4,262
0
0
The difference between you guys and us is you would rather go 1-11 with a win over Ole Miss then 9-3 with a loss to them. No thanks. You can't win this argument because you know I'm right. I'll take a win over LSU or a similarly comparable team then a win over MSU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. You know why? Because no one gives a **** if a team beats MSU. They only care if you beat the LSU's. Congrats, you guys did it for the second time in twenty years. Awesome. Besides Vandy, MSU has less overall wins then any team in the in the SEC. How many bowl games have you guys won? 11 or 12? That's only about half of our total bowl wins so give it some time and you'll catch up.

What freaking argument you trying to make? First you say that you recruit players that are ready to win immediately.... then when it's pointed out that our inferior players have beat your ready to win players consistently the past five years.... you go off on a tangent about the false assumption that MSU would be happy with 1-11 with a win over UM.

Then you bring up poor ole Vandy.... who is beating your *** with regularity. Beating your *** with regularity with your ready to win players.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,693
316
83
It's amazing, Red87 has been a pretty

Good poster for months and loses it over a little too much MSU success.
 

Mack Rebennack

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2007
351
22
18
Umm...You have beat Alabama 3 times since 1977. Nice try Shep.

So is the point that by recruiting this way you can successfully beat one of the big boys once every 7-9 years or so? No thanks . I'll take the players that are more ready to contribute now and just go ahead and claim that big win immediately . And if you're going to pull the " we just beat lsu card," awesome ... Come back after you beat them 3 out of six years like us. Or for that matter , more than once in 15 years .
NMDS
 

Simmer

All-Conference
Jun 21, 2013
1,233
1,093
113
Red is a funny guy.... I guess the OM boards don't let him post so he has to come here.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
21,559
25,138
113
The difference between you guys and us is you would rather go 1-11 with a win over Ole Miss then 9-3 with a loss to them. No thanks. You can't win this argument because you know I'm right. I'll take a win over LSU or a similarly comparable team then a win over MSU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. You know why? Because no one gives a **** if a team beats MSU. They only care if you beat the LSU's. Congrats, you guys did it for the second time in twenty years. Awesome. Besides Vandy, MSU has less overall wins then any team in the in the SEC. How many bowl games have you guys won? 11 or 12? That's only about half of our total bowl wins so give it some time and you'll catch up.

Ah, it's the old, "you guys won 4 out of 5 because you care about the game more than we do" argument. You bunch of **** sound more retarded every time you use that one. Nevermind the fact that you guys rushed the field after the one time you did beat us in the last five years. Look, I know it stings your pride to know that you've been passed by. The sooner you get used to it, the better it's going to be for you.
 
Sep 9, 2012
2,803
0
0
I think we're all still waiting on Red to explain to us how MSU stormed the field after the '07 Egg Bowl.

That one is still a mystery to me.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
21,559
25,138
113
Good poster for months and loses it over a little too much MSU success.

No, he is pretty typical for that bunch. You have lost perspective because you spend too much time on NAFOOM kissing their asses.
 

Digging dog

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2012
3,503
134
63
Like my daddy used to say. "It ain't the dog in the fight, it's the fight in the dog".
 

esplanade91

Redshirt
Dec 9, 2010
5,656
0
0
So is the point that by recruiting this way you can successfully beat one of the big boys once every 7-9 years or so? No thanks . I'll take the players that are more ready to contribute now and just go ahead and claim that big win immediately . And if you're going to pull the " we just beat lsu card," awesome ... Come back after you beat them 3 out of six years like us. Or for that matter , more than once in 15 years .

Funny... I seem to recall you all collectively bitching and moaning about how Nutt left you guys with no talent. Seems like you want to pick whichever narrative fits your bill.
 

archdog

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
1,882
0
0
Funny... I seem to recall you all collectively bitching and moaning about how Nutt left you guys with no talent. Seems like you want to pick whichever narrative fits your bill.

This is the way I see it. Yes we have one of the worst all time records in SEC games. Yes Ole Miss has never played in Atlanta. Neither team's history has anything to do with this season. If you want to discuss your history well every team every week is different. LSU last year was unbeatable at our place and the next week they couldn't complete a pass. Not because your defense was that much better but purely LSU wasn't clicking. So drop the **** about history and ****. Nothing matters except our head to head matchups and you really can only count our last 6 years because of the continuity of our coach. Fact of the matter is you have some great points about our history and our traditional short comings, but the team you will play at Thanksgiving has really nothing to do with that history. So if you want to use that as one of you major points in your superiority, then go right ahead.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,016
1,874
113
The difference between you guys and us is you would rather go 1-11 with a win over Ole Miss then 9-3 with a loss to them.

I honest to God don't know one person who is in this category. Not one. The rest of your post is accurate for us, except replace MSU with Ole Miss. No one cares if y'all lose. We got more mileage off one game last night than our four Egg Bowls in the last five years COMBINED.

Your act really does grow old quickly. Hope you have another user name in the queue.