What about the OJ's and Casey Anthony's of the world that are guilty as hell but proven innocent somehow?
Which is horrible but it doesn't create a "boy who cried wolf situation on top of it all, like guilty until proven innocent does.
What about the OJ's and Casey Anthony's of the world that are guilty as hell but proven innocent somehow?
We aren’t NC State.Whats amazing- this board will discover the rapist before any investigators. The resources of BBN extend everywhere.
How do you know they're the victim and the government officials are guilty? What if the government officials are innocent that makes them the victim. Let's wait for some evidence first. Oh wait, it's been 20 years and there is none. She said vs he said.Shut the f*** up. Honestly, just keep your trap shut if you're going to make fun of sexual assault victims.
Yeah, your post screams winner. Cry to someone who cares. Its dirty political grandstanding, and its my belief people who blindly support it are more of a cancer as opposed to people like me who arent afraid to call a spade a spade. Have a good one bud.
The sure sign someone is a winner at life is they brag about being a winner. Rule #1. [laughing]I don’t blindly support anything. And I’d be willing to bet my life is better than yours. It’s obvious you’re a loser. You can’t see anything you don’t like and challenge your own beliefs or blame it on liberals. Your failure at life is on you not liberals.
The sure sign someone is a winner at life is they brag about being a winner. Rule #1. [laughing]
We're playing a game right now FYI Nancy.I would say less so than a guy who goes on a UK message board and turns a rape thread into a political statement.
Neither do very few false claims amongst countless real ones. It's the illogical people who are incapable of differing between the two who do that.Which is horrible but it doesn't create a "boy who cried wolf situation on top of it all, like guilty until proven innocent does.
Moron? You just told on yourself. He's a Supreme Court Justice.....[jumpingsmile]Have I mentioned that moron at all in anything I've stated? Nope. Not sure why you're focusing on him.
You seem to have trouble staying on point. So he should have to resign based on accusations but you also say both cases deserved to be heard.Lol, where did I say I beleived one way or the other? That was you saying it was proven lies, not me. I said it wasn't proven at all, which is entirely true. Not only was it not proven, it was never on trial to be proven.
Well, considering there are the lewinski tapes that show he was a sexual pervert, and multiple women have accused him and have credible strories, i would say yea, i beleive them. I don't like Hillary either! So what now?
Fairfax needs to go! Both cases deserve to be heard and decided, but 2 accusations in less than a week and it's time to resign. Also, the Governor and AG need to go as well!
When was the trial again?
Burden of proof doesn't detail whether something is actually true or false. Just whether it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused in this case will likely never go on trial because a statute of limitations is likely passed, but that doesn't change what did or didn't happen. Nor will it change public perception.
Facts are very few women actually faslely accuse someone of sexual assault. I know men like to think they do, but the public embarrassment and shame most women have to experience publicly from such admissions are enough to deter most anyone from reporting it period. Far, far more often women don't report sexual assaults becuse of the embarrassment and shame.
I have ZERO affiliation with any political party, idiot. Strike two for you.
I'm not getting political either but the reality for most people is guilty until proven innocent, especially those who lack wealth and power.I'm not going to get political so all I say is, innocent til proven guilty. This modern idea of guilty til proven innocent destroys innocent lives and worse creates Boy Who Called Wolf for actual assault.
For the record, I am male.You do know that after a first sexual assault womens chances of being assaulted again are substantially higher, right?
Just curious, are you male or female?
Being corroborated doesn't make it untrue. Everyone who jas interviewed her has said she appears credible. Also, her witnesses said they couldn't remember the specific night in detail, but that they did admit to attending several parties like the one mentioned. She also knew a lot of details about the guys around that time frame, like when and where they worked, who they socialized with, parties they attended. Seems credible.
Regardless, you did say it was proven false, but that isn't accurate at all. It was never on trial to be decided. Statute of limitations was expired. That was just a senate hearing to decide whether to confrim a justice. 47 people agreed with her side pf events. Well over the amount needed to convict in a court of law.
I don’t blindly support anything. And I’d be willing to bet my life is better than yours. It’s obvious you’re a loser. You can’t see anything you don’t like and challenge your own beliefs or blame it on liberals. Your failure at life is on you not liberals.
Women really don't lie very often about being forcibly raped.
Until very recently it was also very commom for college women to not report rapes by male students. This woman says she went to the Dean and was brushed off. That was also pretty common until recently. In 1999 it's absolutely likely she was raped and nothing was done. She doesn't have much to gain now by coming forward with these accusations if they are false. She felt she could corroborate the behavior of Justin Fairfax and felt a responsibility to do that. He was about to skate with one sexual assault charge and she did not think that was right.
And yes I do have personal experience in this area. All Im gonna say.
This.Wow
Some of you guys truly have no clue about sexual assault and what the mindset of the victim is. No clue whatsoever. And I hope you never do. But don’t make assumptions and don’t put these victims in a box. Like those who grieve over the death of a loved one, victims of SA react in different ways. Try having a little compassion and understanding instead of shaming them because you don’t think they responded the way you believe they should have.
I will say that if this woman is lying I hope to God she’s arrested for false accusation and her life is made a living hell. There are too many people, not just women, who are victims of rape and who are scared enough to come forward. People who make false accusations make it harder for true victims to be believed
Women really don't lie very often about being forcibly raped.
Until very recently it was also very commom for college women to not report rapes by male students. This woman says she went to the Dean and was brushed off. That was also pretty common until recently. In 1999 it's absolutely likely she was raped and nothing was done. She doesn't have much to gain now by coming forward with these accusations if they are false. She felt she could corroborate the behavior of Justin Fairfax and felt a responsibility to do that. He was about to skate with one sexual assault charge and she did not think that was right.
And yes I do have personal experience in this area. All Im gonna say.
I agree women don’t lie about forcible rape not all that often anyway. It’s groping and grey area stuff where there is lying and putting all forms of assault on level with one another. *** grabbing for instance on level with rape. Those things are not equal but there are a lot people who have muddied the waters screaming assault due to a a drunken grope. I’m sorry but those women aren’t even in the same ballpark as a rape victim.
I want to know who the player is personally even if allegedly. I mean it’s duke and all. There’s gottta be a unc grad ready to bring that program to its knees.
I don't know. Worked out ok for Izzo.Not even K and the NCAA can out run “ME TOO”. If this gets out that the University did anything to cover this up. K is done.
How so?You seem to have trouble staying on point. So he should have to resign based on accusations but you also say both cases deserved to be heard.
Make up your mind. It was proven to be lies, you just don't to accept that they were. Nobody would come forward and support her story. No proof anything happened. No evidence. Exactly how was it not proven to be untrue.
You seen to believe both are guilty until proven innocent, that's not how it works.
Not true at all. She had 47 senators believe her story, it only takes 1 judge or a few jurors.No sir. There is NO CHANCE Kavanaugh would ever be convicted in a court of law. Quit trying to muddy that Sht up. She is a liar, an activist, and a fraud. It’s easy to see if you’re not politically motivated.
This thread is junk. From multiple sides but mainly the Goodman brigade. You guys cause more division than you’ll ever know.
New flash.
Women are emotional beings. They are manipulative just like men if not more. Women will lie about rape and to pretend they don’t does a disservice to real victims. And those of you who push false scandals in hopes of political points, you’re nearly on level with the rapist, just know it.
Check out the many liars during the Holdsclaw case. Now maybe he did use his power to sexually assault, but there is ironclad proof of several of those women lying through their teeth and some of those were STILL believed because of activist pressure.
Some of you need to stop pretending you’re actually in the pursuit of justice. You’re in the pursuit of something else entirely.
SO as a male, how much do you feel you know about sexual assault and rape? Particularly against females?For the record, I am male.
Your stats on assault are like those of car wrecks, it's stated someone in a wreck has higher chances of being in another one.
No person has the right to touch a female ever without her consent.
You must be living in a very liberal world not to see some red flags here.
Just curious, does anyone else see a connection in all this and maybe she is from Virginia and now blaming a Duke basketball player?
In no way am I a Duke fan, but even us UK fans must admit what happened to their lacrosse team was just wrong.
My point was that too many people are coming out with accusations against others, whether it being an assault or racism but do not produce any factual facts to support their claims.
I witnessed a man who was a football coach get accused by a female of something that was a lie. She wanted to be part of the football managers team. He said no due to the fact he needed someone in the locker room. She got mad and accused this coach of wrong doing.
His wife had a breakdown; he was tried and sentenced in the media; lost his job and damn near his family.
Months later the girl told the truth; she made it all up to get even with him.
Since then, you have to show me something in the form of proof or I don't believe you. Period.
Not true at all. She had 47 senators believe her story, it only takes 1 judge or a few jurors.
A liar, an activist and a fraud? Really, how so? Where is your proof?
Really? What it my political motivation then? For that matter, what is my political ideology?
With the picture of his little junk that made the internet rounds a while back it would only be a misdemeanor instead of a felony.Had to be Jay Williams.:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
That's strictly your opinion, not fact. However, even if it were true, could a judge or jury not be motivated by the same?Those 47 senators didn't believe he at all. Purely politically motivated.
Her story was clearly not believable.
Allegedly, she and her best friend went to a party with boys who were not in their social circle. Conveniently Ford has no idea where it was or when it was. Her friend denied any knowledge of it.
Now at the party, she was allegedly groped and felt like she might be killed according to her testimony. When she was able to get out of the room and the boys and ran out of the house. At that point again she can't remember how she got home.
So where was her friend? She didn't run out with her and ask her what happened? Or she didn't even notice she'd left and later never never asked why she left. Remember they weren't with kids in their own circle.
This was obviously all made up. And again none of the 47 ACTUALLY believed her based on ANY evidence. This would never have been brought to a real court.
But why would a sensible woman report it, but report it to the Dean instead of the police?Women really don't lie very often about being forcibly raped.
Until very recently it was also very commom for college women to not report rapes by male students. This woman says she went to the Dean and was brushed off. That was also pretty common until recently. In 1999 it's absolutely likely she was raped and nothing was done. She doesn't have much to gain now by coming forward with these accusations if they are false. She felt she could corroborate the behavior of Justin Fairfax and felt a responsibility to do that. He was about to skate with one sexual assault charge and she did not think that was right.
And yes I do have personal experience in this area. All Im gonna say.
That's strictly your opinion, not fact. However, even if it were true, could a judge or jury not be motivated by the same?
You may want to go back and read the facts and statements regarding the case. Leland Keyeser said she did not remeber the specific night or party in question, but that she attended many social gatherings and had no reason to doubt the Blassey-Fords claim and in fact beleived her. Why would she remember the party of nothing of conseqeunce occured for her that night.
Mark Judge was named as another attacker and Patryk Smith were named as another party attendee. Ford also knew where and when Judge worked. Judge and BK were best friends. That's pretty credible that she knew and had contact with the men invovled.
She knew a general time frame, but not specific date or address. This is typical of victims of trauma or in a state of shock. Not to mention over 30 years old. She knew a general location. Do you remember every location and exact date of things that happened to you 30 years ago?
She was more concerned with being attaked or raped and said she thought they may accidentally kill her. She provided very detailed info on the attack.
Why would her friend know or react ? She wasn't the one attacked!
Sure they were. There were a couple of new people, but they were among mutual friends.
Again, that is simply your opinion, not fact.
How many times have you been sexually assaulted. And, how did you deal with it and respond?