From Veazey's blog earlier in the week...

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,250
18,405
113
<font size="2" face="georgia,palatino">Interesting take on RB Anthony Dixon. In the context that backup Robert Elliott is out, Croom said this on Dixon: We've been alternating him in and out," Croom said. "He's got to go every snap now. ...</font> <font size="2" face="georgia,palatino">That's the approach we're going to take the rest of the way," Croom said. "He's got to carry the load now. (Christian) Ducre will come in when he's tired, and/or (Wade) Bonner."</font><font size="2" face="georgia,palatino">Interesting, because Dixon is a guy that is a preseason all-SEC back and a guy that Croom said left 500 yards on the field last year. And he said the loss of Elliott, a redshirt freshman who didn't play in the first game, has an impact on how much he'll play Dixon.
</font>
I just don't get Croom's insistence of not playing Ducre. I think he said that Dixon will only come out when Dixon says he is ready to come out. I like Dixon but to **** on Ducre is mind boggling.
 

Bdog9090

Redshirt
Aug 11, 2008
977
4
18
Croom tried to get more snaps for backups Christian Ducre and the speedy Robert Elliott during the team's disappointing 1-4 start. But Elliott's now gone with a season-ending knee injury and <span style="font-weight: bold;">Ducre has disappointed coaches with missed assignments.</span>
 

jmbeck

Redshirt
Sep 7, 2005
1,198
0
0
This summer, I felt that Dixon and Ducre would be the one-two punch that other schools enjoyed (Williams-Brown, McFadden-Jones) for us this year, obviously to a lesser degree than. But, I still felt like it was our strength.

Now, it's become "it's all on Dixon. We may play Bonner ahead of Ducre."

I don't know if it's because Croom didn't recruit Ducre, or what it is. But, you and the majority of us see a back that can move two people if they're not set when he hits them. He hits the hole faster and harder than Dixon, because Dixon still looks for that shifty route instead of where the play is (supposedly) developing.

Croom isn't a coach, he's a father. He wants to keep his "family" intact. Unfortunately, Ducre is the poor neighbor's son that MSU took in, that Croom treats the same as the illegitimate !%@*@ that his ***** (MSU) had when he married her.
 

muddawgs33

Redshirt
Aug 28, 2007
822
0
0
dawgstudent wrote: _________________________________________________
<font face="georgia,palatino" size="2">Interesting take on RB Anthony Dixon. In the context that backup Robert Elliott is out, Croom said this on Dixon: We've been alternating him in and out," Croom said. "He's got to go every snap now. ...</font> <font face="georgia,palatino" size="2">That's the approach we're going to take the rest of the way," Croom said. "He's got to carry the load now. (Christian) Ducre will come in when he's tired, and/or (Wade) Bonner."</font><font face="georgia,palatino" size="2">Interesting, because Dixon is a guy that is a preseason all-SEC back and a guy that Croom said left 500 yards on the field last year. And he said the loss of Elliott, a redshirt freshman who didn't play in the first game, has an impact on how much he'll play Dixon.
</font>
I just don't get Croom's insistence of not playing Ducre. I think he said that Dixon will only come out when Dixon says he is ready to come out. I like Dixon but to **** on Ducre is mind boggling.
1 game that stands out to me was the GT game. Dixon ran what a 75 or 80 yarder and then Croom keeps him in the game to let dixon run a pitch to the left? I'm sitting there thinking the whole time where the hell is Ducre or even Elliot. Either one of those guys are in and we score a TD on that play. Dixon was gassed and still got 5 yards on that play. Of course, this is also a coaching staff that had to be told what plays to run in the Liberty Bowl by Carroll, so that we could score to win the game. WE ARE!!! M-STATE!!!
 

thunderclap

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
3,089
0
0
Ducre consistently runs harder than Dixon. Doesn't that make sense to you to limit his playing time? Come on, get in the Croom state-of-mind.
 

DamnitDog

Redshirt
Aug 7, 2008
1,123
0
0
I just don't get Croom's insistence of not playing Ducre. - I like Dixon but to **** on Ducre is mind boggling.

Ducre's pass blocking skills are just NOT pretty enough for Croom (sarcasm).
 

jmbeck

Redshirt
Sep 7, 2005
1,198
0
0
I could be wrong...

Point being, I doubt Croom got to talk to his momma and promise her a fine young man and all that with the Ducre family.

Edit: Damnit, I can't believe I screwed up the simple concept of replying to a post. Apologies to all for my blatant stupidity.
 

1msudawg

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2006
575
0
0
thunderclap said:
Ducre consistently runs harder than Dixon. Doesn't that make sense to you to limit his playing time? Come on, get in the Croom state-of-mind.
if something works stop doing it?
 

Stansfield

Redshirt
Apr 3, 2007
1,158
0
0
Ducre probably ate the last rib that Croom was eyeballing at some dinner and Croom hasn't liked him since. We all know it is all about Croom's pride. What I don't understand about Croom is that he is always talking about integrity and character. He seems to be very prideful however, and pride is not a trait of someone who is full of character and integrity. He needs to get off his pedestal and start thinking less about himself and more about Mississippi State.
 

DowntownDawg

Redshirt
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
...maybe they are trying to send a message. Kind of doubt it, though, since we've heard this talk before.