Full Approval Today !!

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
Dude... you act like you are some reservoir of rare insight and knowledge in a world of intellectual darkness, yet you repeatedly demonstrate lack of knowledge of even basic details of what you're talking about. There is no "new" BioNTech shot that was approved separate from the original EUA shot. They're the same shot.
Exactly. I wonder if he's confused since they gave it a marketing name now.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
That paper is from a conspiracy theory factory. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/principia-scientific-international/ Why won't you find information from at least a reasonably reputable source. Here I'll give you two. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/y...covid-19-vaccines-contain-aborted-fetal-cells and here is the Vatican saying it is not immoral: https://www.catholicnews.com/vatica...ent-covid-19-vaccines-are-morally-acceptable/
BTW-loook at the time stamps and how long it took me to find reasonably reliable information.
Right and the mRNA vaccines have never had anything to do with fetal cell lines. J&J did but there is no fetal material in the vaccine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcheluk

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0

Shlomo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2005
2,772
3,706
0
Do you understand the difference between using fetal cell lines during testing and actually having fetal material in a vaccine? Apparently you do not. At any rate, mRNA vaccines have zero, nada, zilch to do with fetal cell lines. It's a totally different technology. Believe it, since it is irrefutable fact.
Irrefutable? How so? Stick with your mainstream media. They have been lying to you for years. Wake up or don't. I don't care.

 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
I give up. We will have to agree to disagree.
Nope, we don't just disagree, you ignore data from any source credible enough to provide it. Let me guess, they're all in on it, right? Vanderbilt, one of the best medical schools in the world just explained to you that mRNA doesn't use fetal cells. Exactly what don't you understand?
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,032
4,253
113
Well, I'm Christian so I won't comment on the other part but you're pretty accurate on the bot farm.
Not meant as an insult to Christians. Nothing wrong with being a Christian unless one uses it as justification for not believing in science. I come from a family of evangelicals and 100% of them have gotten vaccinated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBlueFanGA

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,032
4,253
113
Irrefutable? How so? Stick with your mainstream media. They have been lying to you for years. Wake up or don't. I don't care.

Jesus man. Do you have any desire to vet your sources? TruNews is on the Anti-defamation league watch list. https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...iles-end-times-anti-semitism-and-anti-zionism. They are so bad that financial companies refuse to process their financial transactions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TruNews There is no way in hell you are making it into heaven if you don't start taking some responsibility for where you get your information. Jesus does not like for his followers to follow Anti-Semites.
 

Shlomo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2005
2,772
3,706
0
Nope, we don't just disagree, you ignore data from any source credible enough to provide it. Let me guess, they're all in on it, right? Vanderbilt, one of the best medical schools in the world just explained to you that mRNA doesn't use fetal cells. Exactly what don't you understand?
Nope. There is a wealth of information out there against it. I never said the vaccines contained aborted fetuses. They were used in the development of the vaccine. We can go back and forth all day long and I am not going to waste my time. If you want to take the shot go for it. That is your right. Time will tell who is right and who is wrong. Good luck to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drawing_dead

Shlomo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2005
2,772
3,706
0
Jesus man. Do you have any desire to vet your sources? TruNews is on the Anti-defamation league watch list. https://www.adl.org/resources/backg...iles-end-times-anti-semitism-and-anti-zionism. They are so bad that financial companies refuse to process their financial transactions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TruNews There is no way in hell you are making it into heaven if you don't start taking some responsibility for where you get your information. Jesus does not like for his followers to follow Anti-Semites.
Whatever man. Let me guess you got your information from the ADL right? Of course you did. That is a whole other subject.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drawing_dead

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
Nope. There is a wealth of information out there against it. I never said the vaccines contained aborted fetuses. They were used in the development of the vaccine. We can go back and forth all day long and I am not going to waste my time. If you want to take the shot go for it. That is your right. Time will tell who is right and who is wrong. Good luck to you.
You're being intentionally obtuse because you prefer to believe your own nonsense and you use any source that supports your nonsense all the while ignoring real data from actual experts. Go away, you're a waste of time.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,032
4,253
113
Whatever man. Let me guess you got your information from the ADL right? Take your shot.
I'm not from the ADL, but it took me 5 seconds on Google to find the information on every single one of your sources that categorically refutes them as a potential source of truthful information. We can't have a debate when your sources are hate mongers. Why would a Christian even go to those websites? They're hateful. You owe yourself to do better.
 

Shlomo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2005
2,772
3,706
0
You're being intentionally obtuse because you prefer to believe your own nonsense and you use any source that supports your nonsense all the while ignoring real data from actual experts. Go away, you're a waste of time
Actual experts like Dr. Kervorkian er uh Fauci? We will see in the due time who is right. Good luck to you and your family and I really do mean that.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,032
4,253
113
Whatever man. Let me guess you got your information from the ADL right? Of course you did. That is a whole other subject.
I might add that I do at least respect that you would post your sources. At least there seems to be some sliver of hope that you've just been duped and would be open to change. Take those websites to your preacher and ask them if it's sensible and godly to continue to get your ethos from places like that.
 

Shlomo

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2005
2,772
3,706
0
I might add that I do at least respect that you would post your sources. At least there seems to be some sliver of hope that you've just been duped and would be open to change. Take those websites to your preacher and ask them if it's sensible and godly to continue to get your ethos from places like that.
You should watch Pastor Wiles sometime and form your own opinion instead of just following the ADL. Good luck to you and your family as well. Time will tell who is right or wrong.
 

satcheluk

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2009
3,032
4,253
113
You should watch Pastor Wiles sometime and form your own opinion instead of just following the ADL. Good luck to you and your family as well. Time will tell who is right or w

You should watch Pastor Wiles sometime and form your own opinion instead of just following the ADL. Good luck to you and your family as well. Time will tell who is right or wrong.
He is a dangerous loon and you are too by supporting him. Do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1679862995

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,041
18,841
0
I'm not from the ADL, but it took me 5 seconds on Google to find the information on every single one of your sources that categorically refutes them as a potential source of truthful information. We can't have a debate when your sources are hate mongers.

I’m a professionally trained former news editor/photographer/reporter with more than 15 years of experience. (Left the industry years ago because of the starvation pay, garbage hours, etc.) Some of the BS that passes for a source these days is maddening, terrifying and comical at the same time.

One of my duties as an editor used to be source validation to ensure our reports were accurate, attributed correctly and contained true, credible information. Libel lawsuits are expensive. Media companies are notorious cheap bastards

If one of my reporters filed a story citing some of the sources I’ve seen in this thread, I might’ve fired them or at least questioned their news gathering abilities.

Signs of a poor source:
Poorly written copy with spelling, grammar and/or punctuation errors
Inflammatory headlines with loaded language
Articles with no byline attribution
Sources quoted not attributed with full names or detailed credentials
URLs ending in .co
Loaded language in copy that shows bias (the communist left; the fascist right)