When you need the Giants to kick the obvious field goal at the Cowboys 35 to go up 2 scores with 45 seconds left to put you good for the over, they run it for the first down."
In my FF league for our side pot weekly pick'em I picked against all three of your picks, but I wouldn't put money on the Bears, Denver vs GB nor Miami vs NE.
No, just showing with no money people see it different. With money we try to bet smart. That's all. I think your picks are logical and if I bet that's how I'd pick it but those lines are weird. The weirdest is Pitt +.5 vs a team that is undefeated ATS.
No, YOU pick 2 games per week, not me. If you want to pick more, that's fine -- pick as many as you want, just increases my chances imo...but if I'm deciding which games you are to use...then I'm essentially making the picks.
Bengals haven't lost to the spread yet and that's a trap, IMO. So I'll either bet them and lose or talk myself into leaving it alone and they will win 35-0.
Anth I'm feeling like your judging, and all I can say is it isn't public school betting and the bookie really shouldn't be judged, the people with multiple bets should though!