Gene is banning people over the Stans debates.

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,976
1,741
113
<p class="topicdate">
Posted: Yesterday9:39PM</p><h4>Negativity...</h4>_________________________________________________<div class="messagebody">Ok,
I've read all the negativity that I can stand about Rick Stansbury and
this year's team, especially from those few folks who appear to have
gone from being objective to making it personal against Rick Stansbury
himself. I just banned for three days two of the folks who fall into
that category.If more need to be ban, then so be it.

If you
want to be objective (objective is not being critical of a coach
everytime you write about his team. that is called personal), that's
fine. Make it personal, then I'll make it personal as well and ban you
from this board for a few days.

Gene</div>
 

DerHntr

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2007
15,751
2,545
113
(objective is not being critical of a coach everytime you write about his team. that is called personal),

sounds turrible. i was hoping to see a player land on him during the last home game.

question: if he hadn't had first mover advantage with his board and insteadstarted the same time as this board or BDJ, does anyone actually think he would have been successful?
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,771
6,370
113
**** that`s been a while ago. Damn I wish I could remember what it was about and the date. When did he start that board ?
 

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,606
2,145
113
because I said I preferred Sherrill over Croom. He said it was obvious I was an Ole Miss fan
 

MSUDawg25

Redshirt
Jan 21, 2010
2,088
1
38
Gene's definition of Critical vs Personal is a little off. Just examples.

Critical = Stansbury is a terrible coach,

Personal = Stansbury has a small penis and beats his wife.