You should try exercising critical thought and not just relying on others to form your opinion for you.
Global Climate Changes
- Thread starter Beatle Bum
- Start date
You should try exercising critical thought and not just relying on others to form your opinion for you.
So, if I start to think critically, I can over come trillions of research hours spent by the smartest scientists in the world?
Hopefully everyone can appreciate a climate change alarmist completely fabricating numbers to support his argument that he should just outsource his opinion forming to people who have repeatedly been caught fabricating numbers to support their conclusions.
They're probably well funded scientists, too.
That is why you kept giving us weather updates from Birmingham.
“We are you able …?” When you make fun of others’ IQ or education, you best be perfect.
No...too easy. Did the same in college, and then landed a weather engineering position at NWS.
Big storm in Louisville. Our new normal.
Climate change numbnuts choking on their crow this morning...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/de...fire-confronted-reality-maui-identifies-cause
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/de...fire-confronted-reality-maui-identifies-cause
Much like other pet topics, the demand is way higher than the supply. Many of these fires are loudly cited as climate change but nearly every single one of them get confirmed as human causes; many being arson. The correction of course is quietly made.
Last edited:
More evidence of humans causing climate change
By lighting things on fire with poor and gross mismanagement? That was just we forgot to turn the dial down it sounds like.
Since you keep trying to put a square peg in a round hole, you probably want to sit this one out going forward.
Documented hurricanes hitting Hawaii back into the 1800's. Island drought is not new either. Not exactly sure what you refer to but again, you are completely wrong in your assumption.
The power company started the fire.
Humans run the power company
Henceforth, humans cause the fire and the fire changed the climate.
I love the idea that scientists are greedy bastards who can't be trusted but people who have carbon to haul up and sell are pure as the driven snow.
Meanwhile, back in the 70s oil company scientists confirmed AGW.
You either have a great imagination, very poor reading comprehension, or both, if you think anyone has that idea.
Can someone please post pictures of John Kerry's 14 million dollar 15 Acre OCEAN FRONT property on Martha's Vinyard and his private jet and then tell me he, the Obamas , Bidens and others aren't full of SugarHoneyIceTea!!! It's a damn hoax and all about centralized power.
Global warming IS real. It's pretty clear that it is. What isn't clear is; is it even actually BAD, how much humans have contributed to it, is there any REAL way of handling it in a rational manner.
I'm positive about this though: If you're relying on the government to fix something of that magnitude, then you're doing it wrong. They don't have a great track record. LOL
I'm positive about this though: If you're relying on the government to fix something of that magnitude, then you're doing it wrong. They don't have a great track record. LOL
You think they are the only rich people in the world?
The CEO of Shell and Exxon have really nice Jets and exotic vacation homes.
They provide a service people want
Yup. John Kerry and the Obama’s are not different from the CEOs of Shell and Exxon. Somehow you landed that plane.
I didn’t read all the responses and if this is redundant I apologize, but the Carnegie’s and Vanderbilts, etc and all those people basically built America using slave labor like the countries were competing with NOW and those countries don’t have unions and pensions etc.
It’s literally impossible to compete with them and save the environment at the same time unless they do the same. If you want the US to do it alone, cool but you will push the issue back 10-40 years. Congrats, slow clap. It does nothing unless everyone does.
How many times does anyone need to say this, “Get everyone on board and we’ll all be down for it. If you just want the US to do it alone you will not persuade anyone.”
So are they climate extremist crying that the oceans are about to flood the earth? All the names I mentioned are just power hungry zealots!!! Seen Greta lately.
Mining cobalt produces hazardous tailings and slags that can leach into the environment, and studies have found high exposure in nearby communities, especially among children, to cobalt and other metals.Jun 23, 2023
And there’s the whole child slave labor issue.
But like diamonds, green energy is a vanity project for the global warming “elite”. Sure there are lab grown diamond alternatives, but the real value is knowing a small African child clawed it from a mine with his bleeding fingers.
Exxon knows burning carbon traps heat over the earth, thus causing warming. They have as many politicians in their pockets as they can manage for more government leeway and subsidies. Seen friends of coal lately?
Why are you using carbon generated energy to post here if you’re opposed to it?
Is this what you're referencing
It's real, the problem is they've turned it into a cult. It meets every definition of a religion. Not every weather event is climate change. But govt officials claim this to A. Cover for their incompetence...as we've seen in Hawaii and California wildfires. B. For their investments in big solar and big wind.
Followers are def a religion tho. Notice if you disagree with any policy bc you question its effectiveness, they straight resort to claiming you don't believe science, or if you disagree that a weather event is out of the ordinary, they use anecdotal claims....bc you tested their Dogma. Is Jesus the son of God, is Muhammed a prophet, is Huricane climate change. All the same.
Last edited:
Most people who deny that human activity is warming the planet just dismiss a massive body of scientific evidence as a big hoax.
But there’s a more sophisticated set of climate “skeptics” who make arguments that, at least to the lay ear, sound like they’re grounded in scientific evidence. And because most of us lack the background to evaluate their claims, they can muddy the waters around an issue that’s been settled in the scientific community.
But there’s a more sophisticated set of climate “skeptics” who make arguments that, at least to the lay ear, sound like they’re grounded in scientific evidence. And because most of us lack the background to evaluate their claims, they can muddy the waters around an issue that’s been settled in the scientific community.
"...settled in the scientific community..."
That, as history has repeatedly demonstrated; means almost nothing. If anything, it should raise a red flag.
Science is quite literally BUILT on skepticism. Setting aside the consensus and group think has led to the most impactful discoveries in all of humankind.
That, as history has repeatedly demonstrated; means almost nothing. If anything, it should raise a red flag.
Science is quite literally BUILT on skepticism. Setting aside the consensus and group think has led to the most impactful discoveries in all of humankind.
Her questions and the assumptions upon which they rest were pathetic.