by saying they has not been really much better than us <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">before 1999</span> is proving that Stansbury is overachieving??????? He didnt become the head coach until 1999 dipshit...
fact: state doesnt do what it did before 99 without stanbury's recruiting....again, you continue to neglect the recruiting aspect here at mississippi state
sleeping giant? Sleeping giant = program sucked until someone figured out how to win there...obviously it wasnt that easy because people weren't doing before Pearl
sleeping giant = 101 million dollar athletic budget, 25,000 seat arena, 70,000 sq.ft. practice facility, ect.
History says that is ********. History says Mississippi, South Carolina, and Auburn will always be worse than us. Georgia too. UPig hasnt been to a Sweet 16 since we have...Our program was almost exactly equal to Fla until they hired Donovan. So, I think based on fact, we are closer to being 4th or 5th than we our the worst
History..with Rick Stanbury non the less..point proven.
2 things-
1. Obviously not- it counted more when they beat us in Gainesville. They made the Tourney- we didnt
2. I dont ever look at us as "little ol' mississippi state"....and it's dumbass fans like you that are holding us back by doing so
1. everyone in thecountry knows we got screwedout of the ncaa tourney......and let mesay it again...we whooped their *** when it counted...does the SEC tourney not count in your retarded view?
2. fans like me are holding mississippi state back...wow...you really are a total dumbass.....i know rick has over achieved throughout his coaching career here at mississipp state (we're not kentucky by the way)............and yes, his over achieving includes recruiting in which you keep over looking