I'll explain to you Barney style as to why I brought up all of my points. The Mayo incident, although it was in college, is a shady incident which is what you asked for. I delivered. And although it is a too common practice, you don't know every single player that is receiving any kind of financial benefits while they're in college, and any accusation of any other player with out substantial proof is just that... an accusation. Just because you know it goes on, saying that it happens across the board doesn't make it less shady now does it? Especially when it's supposedly breaking the rules of the NCAA which everyone on this board will quickly point out once Cam Newton comes up. That's a double standard if I've ever seen one. The fact that you're even arguing against this point is showing your bias.<div>
</div><div>As far as what I personally think of Randolph, to be honest the guy seems like a good dude from what I can see of him on tv. But just because he's real active in community service doesn't mean ****. Ron Artest is probably one of the more active members in community service in the NBA and everyone will be quick to point out how crazy he is. Even though Randolph doesn't act like Artest on the court, the point of the matter is just because you don't see it doesn't mean things have changed. As far as how I feel about him though, I really hope he has gotten over that hump, but people who back him up and criticize people who have had no legal issues to speak of is baffling to me.</div><div>
</div><div>And the only reason I bring up Allen and defend Westbrook is because right now I'm specifically choosing to see things through navy and gold glasses just like everyone here is choosing to look through a pair of blue and yellow. Everyone here is saying that Westbrook is punk for... whatever reason... that apparently I don't see nearly as much. Well.. to me the closest player on the Grizzlies would be Allen. Fair enough?</div>