This all goes back to the media having no concept of evidentiary standards. The NCAA's burden is not beyond a reasonable doubt. They're not trying McGee for a crime in a court of law, they're investigating a member institution for cheating at sports.
Who were the eyewitnesses in the Rose case? Where was the person saying that he took Rose's test? Where was the paper trail? None of those things existed. Memphis got hammered.
In this instance there are multiple eyewitnesses, phone records and a wire transfer. The issue is not "did this happen". I think they've nailed that down. The issue is now "who knew" or more importantly "who should have known". That's why Pitino was telling McGee through his media lapdogs to fall on the sword yesterday.
Who were the eyewitnesses in the Rose case? Where was the person saying that he took Rose's test? Where was the paper trail? None of those things existed. Memphis got hammered.
In this instance there are multiple eyewitnesses, phone records and a wire transfer. The issue is not "did this happen". I think they've nailed that down. The issue is now "who knew" or more importantly "who should have known". That's why Pitino was telling McGee through his media lapdogs to fall on the sword yesterday.