sometimes, yes.
I've always been higher on Lee than most, think UCLPower was in that boat with me. He plays with high IQ and energy almost always. I love his little volleyball style block, it usually keeps the ball in play rather than tossing it out of bounds.Can't get over how well Lee is playing. So much confidence. Catches everything. Calling for lobs. Rebounding with authority. Love it.
He doesn't have the ceiling of Willie at his best but he shows up on a more consistent basis.Lee is like a mini WCS. Dude is everywhere...
Lee is like a mini WCS. Dude is everywhere...
He doesn't have the ceiling of Willie at his best but he shows up on a more consistent basis.[/QUOTE
Higher floor. Lower ceiling.
They only use one commercial for all spots and it's probably made to works on girls (the weaker gender) because they're more likely to have chips on their shoulder and think they're being singled out when they're not.Except I can't think of many teenage girls watching a UK game on the last Saturday before school starts back. I love UK basketball, but I can't imagine it really holding the interest for that demographic. Maybe it's targeted at the teenage boys - "Hey, they have pretty girls there. That's it, I'm picking UK!"
:joy:[thumb2]They only use one commercial for all spots and it's probably made to works on girls (the weaker gender) because they're more likely to have chips on their shoulder and think they're being singled out when they're not.
How is Louisville 10 spots ahead of Kentucky in the Sagarin Ratings? Do losses count more than wins?
Except I can't think of many teenage girls watching a UK game on the last Saturday before school starts back. I love UK basketball, but I can't imagine it really holding the interest for that demographic. Maybe it's targeted at the teenage boys - "Hey, they have pretty girls there. That's it, I'm picking UK!"
It is weird though. I recently researched the effect of sports and enrollment.This used to be called "The Flutie Effect" because of Boston College's growth after Flutie's year.
There is merit to this argument when looking at enrollment numbers from pre-success and post-success at athletic programs. When Georgetown University had an unprecedented string of success from 1983-1986, its enrollment grew 45 percent. After the perfect season and Fiesta Bowl victory by Boise State football in 2006, enrollment skyrocketed by 138 percent.
Northern Iowa’s success in the 2010 NCAA basketball tournament showed a massive increase in donations by boosters. According to one study, every team that made the 2009 NCAA basketball tournament saw an increase of applications and enrollment by at least one percent.
Miami football, Gonzaga basketball, Northern Iowa, George Mason also had big boosts too.
What about UK?
I don't doubt that sports has an impact on enrollment. I went to Murray State. I first heard of Murray due to it's basketball program. For schools like Murray, Northern Iowa, Wichita State, etc., they get recognition and exposure they haven't had before, so people are curious and will explore them, which ups the enrollment. Also, for boosters, everyone wants to be associated with a winner, so when the program is winning, the money should roll in.
I'm just saying the commercial is odd to me as while I know we all love UK basketball, I would say that 16-18 year old girls are the ones least likely to watch the game on tv, so I'm not sure why they would make a commercial appealing to them. If they had put a guy in that role, then I'd more likely buy it. But then again, UK's campaigns have always perplexed me. Most other universities focus on their academic accomplishments. UK doesn't seem to highlight them nearly as much.
It's more evident in schools who didn't have the previous type of success.
Not always...University of Alabama enrollment before Saban in 2006 was just under 24,000. This year it is 37,100. Also about 50% of students are out of state. Read an article a couple of years ago that said the estimated financial benefit of Saban to the university was in the $600-$700 million range. That was about 2 years ago. A bargain for the $8 million per they pay him.
A look at UK for a little over the past decade.
2003-2004: 26,260; 27-5
2004-2005: 26,545; 28-6
2005-2006: 26,439; 22-13
2006-2007: 27,209; 22-12
2007-2008: 26,648; 18-13
2008-2009: 26,913; 22-14
2009-2010: 27,171; 35-3
2010-2011: 28,037; 29-9*
2011-2012: 28,094; 38-2*
2012-2013: 28,928; 21-12
2013-2014: 29,410; 29-11*
2014-2015: 30,062; 38-1*
-I assume they'll switch bowl season up next year. They really dropped the ball with scheduling this year. Rose Bowl, ggp.