I'm only a casual NFL watcher but someone explain to me:
1) How the Bengals' DB hit on the Steeler WR in the 3rd quarter was a penalty, when he led with his shoulder and the receiver was not defenseless;
2) Why the Steeler DB's hit on Bernard was legal when he led with his helmet; and
3) MOST OF ALL, WHY JIM NANTZ IS BEING SUCH A STEELER HOMER *****, JUSTIFYING BAD CALLS ON 1 AND 2 ABOVE, AND THEN WHINING ENDLESSLY ABOUT BURFICT'S SACK OF ROETHLISBERGER, WHEN EVERYONE AGREES CONCLUSIVELY THAT IT WAS A LEGAL HIT.
I was rooting for the Bengals anyway, but Nantz's holier-than-thou / *****-*** act has sent me over the edge. Go Bengals - this would be a huge win for them especially the way it has played out tonight.