Haarms transferring
- Thread starter MV9000
- Start date
not at all. Haarms had a timeshare (and on the wrond end) with Trevion Wiliams. A change gives him more minutes and a bigger role.
Wow. Didn't see that coming. Must have been our season-ending win at Mackey that threw him over the edge.
Maybe he wants to come to RU for one year and Cliff can stay at the four if he qualifies as a grad transfer. If he has to sit a year than I would doubt he would come to RU. I am sure he wants a place where he can play close to 30 minutes. Williams was getting most of the minutes at the end of the season.
We have 2 big men. Cliff will be a freshman and Myles will be a junior. Why would we want Haarms?
Do we really want to go back playing 2 big guys on the floor again?
We have too many bodies right now for not enough minutes. Unless we are writing off players from last year's rotation I really see no interest in transfers at this time.
Do we really want to go back playing 2 big guys on the floor again?
We have too many bodies right now for not enough minutes. Unless we are writing off players from last year's rotation I really see no interest in transfers at this time.
What is this obsession with taking players inferior to the ones we have?
Don't want him, let Cliff play more minutes.
He's the softest 7'3" I saw play this year.
Michigan is targeting a 5 star CG to come in and start and was also linked to trying and lure Harvard's Bryce Aiken to go there. If Aiken doesn't pick Seton Hall as many expect, he may go to Michigan.
Howard is killing it on the recruiting trail. He’s going to win a championship there soon.
Haarms was basically relegated to a screen-setter and second banana to Trevion Williams.
He will probably go somewhere where he can become the primary "big". But he better make sure there's a good barber on campus... That hair flip, LOL.
He will probably go somewhere where he can become the primary "big". But he better make sure there's a good barber on campus... That hair flip, LOL.
We should only have 2 big guys on the floor at the same time in very limited minutes. Things worked out much better with the spread out offense. Leave the lane open......
If, Cliff can come along much faster and can learn to hit a 15-20 footer consistently(will take some time), then we can play him and Myles together. But, until that can happen, NO we should not play both bigs on the court at the same time.
Best of Luck,
Groz
Last edited:
I heard Arizona State could use a big man
Is it me or does it seem like Seton Hall is in on every transfer this offseason.
[QUOTE="Local Shill, post: 4492691, member: 554"]Seton Hall, Syracuse Iona and Minnesota among the schools that have contacted him.
[/QUOTE]
Harms would be perfect for Seton Hall ... The Land of Soft Bigs. Harms flops around like those roadside sock puppets they use to advertise tire sales.
[/QUOTE]
Harms would be perfect for Seton Hall ... The Land of Soft Bigs. Harms flops around like those roadside sock puppets they use to advertise tire sales.
Why are we picking on a guy who gave 100% when he was on the floor. He is looking after what he perceives as his best interests.
Always hated him, total mouth-off guy and always seemed like a jerk on the court. Jacob’s dunk was the best thing ever
Those teams plus SHU seem like they are just throwing names against a wall and hoping one or two will stick.
Reminds me of a recently departed football coach who gave scholarship offers to every single kid in America who played high school football.